Re: Brazil vs England

by Lex Wed Feb 06, 2013 9:35 pm

Stupidley did ok to be fair. Welbeck was utter trash, though

by Lex Wed Feb 06, 2013 9:36 pm

The Franchise wrote:
Lex wrote:Francs butthurt that Adriano's butt got hurt

Lex you should watch without the commentary, I bet it changes your view. If one of those "Walcott vs Brazil" youtube vids gets uploaded ill bring it here.

Adriano won the ball from him at least 4 times, nothing flashy but of course the commentary wont mention i.

Walcott done him twice in a row, but as I said, one was blocked and nothing came of it.

How many times would Walcott have to smash Adriano for him to be considered skinned? Isn't twice enough? One of those even led to a goal.

by Gil Wed Feb 06, 2013 9:37 pm

B-Mac MUFC wrote:
Gil wrote:Welbeck and Tom Clevvvvzzz are utter shite. Both are a stain on English football.

where's Josh McEachran and Sturridge

Sturridge is miles better than Welbeck. McEachran will join Liverpool next January and dominate the BPL,

by Lex Wed Feb 06, 2013 9:37 pm

Who did Walcott run behind for the blocked shot that allowed Rooney to score?

by The Franchise Wed Feb 06, 2013 9:38 pm

Lex wrote:Who did Walcott run behind for the blocked shot that allowed Rooney to score?

Adriano. The one of the two times he got behind him.

by Gil Wed Feb 06, 2013 9:39 pm

Where's Moaly btw? Waaaaahh waaaahhhh England don't have Messi Ronaldo and Sissoko.

Support your country ffs. :facepalm:

by Lex Wed Feb 06, 2013 9:40 pm

The Franchise wrote:
Lex wrote:Who did Walcott run behind for the blocked shot that allowed Rooney to score?

Adriano. The one of the two times he got behind him.

Then that would make it three times, cos he did it twice again after that

by Mr Nick09 Wed Feb 06, 2013 9:40 pm

England giving hopes to Gil in friendlies only to massively flop when it matters, seen it before Laughing

by Gil Wed Feb 06, 2013 9:41 pm

The Franchise wrote:
Lex wrote:Who did Walcott run behind for the blocked shot that allowed Rooney to score?

Adriano. The one of the two times he got behind him.

He got abused, end of. Stop making excuses. Even 3/4 times in a game is a lot by normal standards.

Deal with it.

by The Franchise Wed Feb 06, 2013 9:41 pm

Lex wrote:
The Franchise wrote:
Lex wrote:Francs butthurt that Adriano's butt got hurt

Lex you should watch without the commentary, I bet it changes your view. If one of those "Walcott vs Brazil" youtube vids gets uploaded ill bring it here.

Adriano won the ball from him at least 4 times, nothing flashy but of course the commentary wont mention i.

Walcott done him twice in a row, but as I said, one was blocked and nothing came of it.

How many times would Walcott have to smash Adriano for him to be considered skinned? Isn't twice enough? One of those even led to a goal.

He got behind him once and did something of note, got behind him again and nothing came of it

He didnt do anything else against Adriano and lost the ball like 4-5 times.

I dont see how that is smashing someone honestly.

They had a nice battle, Walcott edged it because he got a goal out of it. But the way people are going on, its as if he scored a hattrick and Adriano didnt get near him the whole game.

by Gil Wed Feb 06, 2013 9:41 pm

Mr Nick09 wrote:England giving hopes to Gil in friendlies only to massively flop when it matters, seen it before

France.

by Lex Wed Feb 06, 2013 9:42 pm

Francs, pls

by The Franchise Wed Feb 06, 2013 9:42 pm

Gil wrote:
The Franchise wrote:
Lex wrote:Who did Walcott run behind for the blocked shot that allowed Rooney to score?

Adriano. The one of the two times he got behind him.

He got abused, end of. Stop making excuses. Even 3/4 times in a game is a lot by normal standards.

Deal with it.

Meh, nothing to deal with. I dont support Brazil, Adriano could of actually got smashed and then come back to Barca and continue to do well...wouldnt of effected me.

But that doesnt mean I have to agree with blatant hyperbole. He got beat twice and got tackled 4-5 times.

by Mr Nick09 Wed Feb 06, 2013 9:44 pm

Gil wrote:
Mr Nick09 wrote:England giving hopes to Gil in friendlies only to massively flop when it matters, seen it before

France.

im not french rofl

by The Franchise Wed Feb 06, 2013 9:44 pm

Okay, then im done Laughing

I am hoping someone makes a Walcott v Brazil video on youtube and then we can see just how many times Adriano wins it off him. Maybe then you will change your opinion, probably not, but maybe we will see.

by VendettaRed07 Wed Feb 06, 2013 9:45 pm

Friendly or not, This was the first time that England beat Brazil in 23 years, so I've heard atleast.. soo.. well done! Jack adds so much for England. If only they had him in the Euro..

by Arquitecto Wed Feb 06, 2013 9:46 pm

The Franchise wrote:Okay, then im done

I am hoping someone makes a Walcott v Brazil video on youtube and then we can see just how many times Adriano wins it off him. Maybe then you will change your opinion, probably not, but maybe we will see.

Dani pls. Don't be surprised as this is the typical English attitude here when they win a friendly against anyone. Laughing

OT: France? How could anyone criticize France when everyone knows they are cack in friendlies along with having a newly installed Deschamp?

by Great Leader Sprucenuce Wed Feb 06, 2013 9:48 pm

Why does everyone take so much from friendlies? they mean absolutely nothing lol.

Major tournaments are the only thing that matters.

by Lex Wed Feb 06, 2013 9:48 pm

But it wasn't just anyone though, was it. This was the 5 time, 5 time, 5 time, 5 time, 5 TIME world cup winners

by Lex Wed Feb 06, 2013 9:50 pm

If England had lost, everyone would be giving them shit about it, but since they actually won (and won convincingly as well) "it's only a friendly" Laughing

by Albiceleste Wed Feb 06, 2013 9:51 pm

Great Leader Sprucenuce wrote:Why does everyone take so much from friendlies? they mean absolutely nothing lol.

Major tournaments are the only thing that matters.

Mole we are world champs now ffs thanks to friendlies

bow down pls

by B-Mac Wed Feb 06, 2013 9:51 pm

Grit and Steel > Flair and Technique

:bow:

by B-Mac Wed Feb 06, 2013 9:52 pm

Lex wrote:If England had lost, everyone would be giving them shit about it, but since they actually won (and won convincingly as well) "it's only a friendly"

this

by Donuts Wed Feb 06, 2013 9:52 pm

So... Mexico ranked #1 after beating Brazil in a tournament that actually mattered? (olympics) xD

by B-Mac Wed Feb 06, 2013 9:54 pm

Gil wrote:
B-Mac MUFC wrote:
Gil wrote:Welbeck and Tom Clevvvvzzz are utter shite. Both are a stain on English football.

where's Josh McEachran and Sturridge

Sturridge is miles better than Welbeck. McEachran will join Liverpool next January and dominate the BPL,

Liverpool and dominate rofl

....what are you on today Gil?

by Mr Nick09 Wed Feb 06, 2013 9:54 pm

Lex wrote:If England had lost, everyone would be giving them shit about it, but since they actually won (and won convincingly as well) "it's only a friendly"

we give shitz to england because they usually amount to nothing nowhere, cup or friendlies

by Sponsored content