Re: FC Barcelona vs AC Milan Second Leg

by Albiceleste Tue Mar 12, 2013 6:37 pm

Pique to play CF with Masche as the only defender :bow:

by Albiceleste Tue Mar 12, 2013 6:39 pm

FC Barcelona vs AC Milan Second Leg - Page 5 TZkbvC9

RG before turning on chat

by Casciavit Tue Mar 12, 2013 6:41 pm

Due to daylight savings, I've been confused with the time of the match. Does the match start in 5 minutes or in an hour?

by Zealous Tue Mar 12, 2013 6:42 pm

Albiceleste wrote:

RG before turning on chat

by TheRedStag Tue Mar 12, 2013 6:42 pm

An hour and 3 mins

by Great Leader Sprucenuce Tue Mar 12, 2013 6:43 pm

by Casciavit Tue Mar 12, 2013 6:43 pm

TheRedStag wrote:An hour and 3 mins

Ah, okay. Thanks.

by Juveman17 Tue Mar 12, 2013 6:45 pm

Surag wrote:Forza Barca for this game by the way.

Milan getting knocked out means Juve will be getting the larger share of CL TV money.I'm all for it

Greedy bastard :coffee:

by The Franchise Tue Mar 12, 2013 6:47 pm

Zealous wrote:
The Franchise wrote:What material?

What should he say? Yeah come, we might not win and you might know it too...but come anyway.

Anyway, good to hear. Pique sounding like a captain, something that was expected of him some years ago which seemed like it might not actually happen.

It was a good speech and if it were Ramos or Iker saying the same things I would feel a lot of positive feelings towards them.

But the pitch comments can definitely be used if Barca don't win. His comments about Barca's history fall right into the hands of Iker's "Barca are a passing fashion" comments too

Anyway if Barca don't make it expect lots of jokes being made about his comments. Respect to Pique though, a captain's press conference.

I dont see anything out of the ordinary. Iker was just brainwashed by the cult leader, cant blame him really for being mislead into saying something so utterly stupid.

Expect jokes? Only from stupid people who have more time than sense I suppose.

by The Franchise Tue Mar 12, 2013 6:47 pm

Mascherano? We are almost certain to concede a set piece goal. Poor Pique, the only player in the team capable of winning an aerial duel.

by Albiceleste Tue Mar 12, 2013 6:48 pm

Song shouldve played in place for Xavi or Villa imo. Set pieces are going to give me a stroke

by The Franchise Tue Mar 12, 2013 6:49 pm

What?

We need 2 goals, how is putting in a defensive player for an offensive player going to help that?

by Albiceleste Tue Mar 12, 2013 6:52 pm

Iniesta can play LW, he's played there all season. Song can also go forward too. Keeping a cleansheet is a bigger priority than scoring imo

by Zealous Tue Mar 12, 2013 6:53 pm

Albiceleste wrote:Iniesta can play LW, he's played there all season. Song can also go forward too.

True but it's arguably been a reason why you've struggled in some games.

by Kaladin Tue Mar 12, 2013 6:54 pm

fml we're gonna get roflstomped

by Kaladin Tue Mar 12, 2013 6:54 pm

Flamini red card minute 34 incoming

by TheRedStag Tue Mar 12, 2013 6:55 pm

TheRedStag wrote:Is Cesc on the bench?

by Great Leader Sprucenuce Tue Mar 12, 2013 6:55 pm

roflstomped Laughing

who ever invented that word deserves a medal.

by Kaladin Tue Mar 12, 2013 6:55 pm

Great Leader Sprucenuce wrote:roflstomped who ever invented that word deserves a medal.

Copyright by El Shaarawy Wink

by guest7 Tue Mar 12, 2013 6:57 pm

Zealous wrote:
Albiceleste wrote:Iniesta can play LW, he's played there all season. Song can also go forward too.

True but it's arguably been a reason why you've struggled in some games.

Except Cesc has scored or assisted in almost every big game since he arrived, which is alot more than Xavi has done in any big game these past two seasons. Rolling Eyes

Cesc is a scapegoat, they should instead focus on why Xavi can't even make a single through pass for his life. Atleast Cesc is creating... Unfair scapegoating.

by The Franchise Tue Mar 12, 2013 6:58 pm

Iniesta as a winger? You just want us eliminated dont you?

At least 50% of the reason we lost the first game was Iniesta playing on the wing.

Set pieces are a problem, indeed we need to keep a clean sheet but the answer is not destroying our hopes of scoring but not swapping 6'2 Abidal for 4'7 Alba and just not having Mascherano..who isnt good in the air...or anywhere else really for that matter.

by S Tue Mar 12, 2013 6:59 pm

juveman17 wrote:
Surag wrote:Forza Barca for this game by the way.

Milan getting knocked out means Juve will be getting the larger share of CL TV money.I'm all for it

Greedy bastard

by The Franchise Tue Mar 12, 2013 6:59 pm

Se7en wrote:
Zealous wrote:
Albiceleste wrote:Iniesta can play LW, he's played there all season. Song can also go forward too.

True but it's arguably been a reason why you've struggled in some games.

Except Cesc has scored or assisted in almost every big game since he arrived, which is alot more than Xavi has done in any big game these past two seasons.

Cesc is a scapegoat, they should instead focus on why Xavi can't even make a single through pass for his life. Atleast Cesc is creating... Unfair scapegoating.

Lucky for us, goals and assists are completely irrelevant Laughing

by Albiceleste Tue Mar 12, 2013 6:59 pm

Song also won't lose the ball in midfield trying some hocus-pocus cruyff turn shite

by The Franchise Tue Mar 12, 2013 7:01 pm

No instead Song will get beaten trying to tackle after Mascherano loses us possession with a trademark long ball into the old man in the 4th row.

by Great Leader Sprucenuce Tue Mar 12, 2013 7:01 pm

Se7en wrote:
Zealous wrote:
Albiceleste wrote:Iniesta can play LW, he's played there all season. Song can also go forward too.

True but it's arguably been a reason why you've struggled in some games.

Except Cesc has scored or assisted in almost every big game since he arrived, which is alot more than Xavi has done in any big game these past two seasons.

Cesc is a scapegoat, they should instead focus on why Xavi can't even make a single through pass for his life. Atleast Cesc is creating... Unfair scapegoating.

Cesc unbalances the team offensively and defensively, you have to be a moron to not see that.

by Sponsored content