Re: Gareth Bale

by El Chelsea Fuerte Mon Oct 03, 2011 2:31 am

EarlyPrototype wrote:
Debatable for Chelsea, but Bale > Malouda (if he starts)

Debatable? What debatable? You would rather have Bale than Mata? And Anelka is ahead of Malouda in that position and don't tell me you would rather have Bale than Anelka.

EarlyPrototype wrote:
Immaculate_Mole wrote:
EarlyPrototype wrote:IMO

United is the only team where he will be benched.

Debatable for Chelsea, but Bale > Malouda (if he starts)

Hoilette? that is very hypocritical of you since a week ago you said he has not done anything.

He has'nt but you can see the talent is there and consistently performed every game this season so far, i stand by what i said about him he needs to stay at Blackburn before moving to a bigger club......

But he is much better all round winger than Bale and has performed more often than Bale.....

Oh Yh Mata is the LW for Chelsea so no he wouldnt start, he wouldnt start at Liverpool and Arsenall either.....

Downing and Gervinho are both better and actually perform most weeks Gervinho does have a problem with finishing though......

Can we please stop overrating Bale please he hardly ever performs and when he does 1 run past a player that was playing league 1 before this season he is suddenly god.....

Again prove he performs consistently if you can.....

But you cant because he never does.

Well from what I have seen so far from Chelsea Mata doesn't really play LW though he is a better player and I would play them both.

Mata does in fact play LW. But bearing in mind we play a 4-3-3 and with Mata on the other wing, would you rather play him ahead of Sturridge or Anelka?

by EarlyPrototype Mon Oct 03, 2011 8:30 am

Mata is always playing behind Torres and that is where I would play him.

-------------------------Torres----------------------

Bale--------------------Mata-------------Sturridge

Anelka who?

by boss Mon Oct 03, 2011 12:35 pm

Gareth Bale is a pure class imo Wink

by B-Mac Mon Oct 03, 2011 6:01 pm

Just to get a unbiased opinion from someone I took to twitter and asked 2 guys who cover the game for a living and these were there answers Arsenal fans

Gareth Bale - Page 4 A7159c28

by EarlyPrototype Mon Oct 03, 2011 7:23 pm

Why are Walcott and Bale even being compared.

by B-Mac Mon Oct 03, 2011 7:28 pm

EarlyPrototype wrote:Why are Walcott and Bale even being compared.

english_jewel wrote:I would rather have Walcott than Bale.

Lex wrote:What's Bale got that Walcott doesn't

This should be delicious

by Lex Mon Oct 03, 2011 8:03 pm

Gareth Bale and superior defending in the same sentence Gareth Bale - Page 4 Happy0009

There's a reason why he's not a left back anymore...

And in what way does he have better work-rate than Walcott? I don't see it

by B-Mac Mon Oct 03, 2011 8:04 pm

Lex wrote:Gareth Bale and superior defending in the same sentence Yanno, there's a reason why he's not a left back anymore...

And in what way does he have more work-rate than Walcott? I don't see it

yes we know you don't see it, or any arsenal fan for that matter....that's why those are unbiased opinions and yours aren't

by Lex Mon Oct 03, 2011 8:06 pm

Explain to me, then, how Gareth Bale works harder than Theo Walcott. Because he runs around like a headless chicken?

by RealGunner Mon Oct 03, 2011 8:09 pm

Walcott 13 goals and 8 assists last season

Bale 11 goals 3 assists last season

Please do explain why bale is better then walcott ?

by EarlyPrototype Mon Oct 03, 2011 8:17 pm

Bale had Crouch on the end of his passes who cant score to save his life. Bale plays much wider than Walcott too and Bale runs for 90 minutes so he is a more hard working player.

by Raptorgunner Mon Oct 03, 2011 8:17 pm

RealGunner wrote:Walcott 13 goals and 8 assists last season

Bale 11 goals 3 assists last season

Please do explain why bale is better then walcott ?

He is an Arsenal player, never gets the credit he deserves.

by Albiceleste Mon Oct 03, 2011 8:27 pm

Lex wrote:Explain to me, then, how Gareth Bale works harder than Theo Walcott. Because he runs around like a headless chicken?

Because he is a box to box left back :coffee:

by boss Mon Oct 03, 2011 8:35 pm

I wonder why this thread turned into Bale vs Walcott...! well then , both of em are GREAT & i see no reason to compare best friends u know !

by B-Mac Mon Oct 03, 2011 8:39 pm

RealGunner wrote:Walcott 13 goals and 8 assists last season

Bale 11 goals 3 assists last season

Please do explain why bale is better then walcott ?

ooooo stats lol that really makes walcott superior...playing in a stronger side last season to boot

fact is these are all opinions, but the fact that true unbiased opinions rate him, proves that people on here saying he is a quality player are not the idiots you all are making them out to be

and god knows Arsenal fans will never rate a Tottenham player...

Ramsey>Modric is next lol

by guest7 Mon Oct 03, 2011 8:39 pm

What can Bale do that Walcott can't?

by EarlyPrototype Mon Oct 03, 2011 8:42 pm

What can Xavi do that Ozil can't?

What can Kaka do that Pastore can't?

is that the only useless argument here?

Bale can do everything better than Walcott.

Only thing Walcott has better is a tad bit more pace.

by RealGunner Mon Oct 03, 2011 8:43 pm

EarlyPrototype wrote:What can Xavi do that Ozil can't?

What can Kaka do that Pastore can't?

is that the only useless argument here?

Bale can do everything better than Walcott.

Only thing Walcott has better is a tad bit more pace.

Is that why Walcott scores more then bale ? Or assists more then bale ?

by guest7 Mon Oct 03, 2011 8:44 pm

EarlyPrototype wrote:What can Xavi do that Ozil can't?
Control the tempo of the game

What can Kaka do that Pastore can't?
Pace? (pre injury Kaka)

is that the only useless argument here?

Bale can do everything better than Walcott.

Only thing Walcott has better is a tad bit more pace.

I think it's a valid argument, Walcott beats Bale at everything, pace, dribbling, shooting, I can go on all day

by B-Mac Mon Oct 03, 2011 8:45 pm

RealGunner wrote:
EarlyPrototype wrote:What can Xavi do that Ozil can't?

What can Kaka do that Pastore can't?

is that the only useless argument here?

Bale can do everything better than Walcott.

Only thing Walcott has better is a tad bit more pace.

Is that why Walcott scores more then bale ? Or assists more then bale ?

he played in a stronger side last year ffs.....Nasri, Fabregas, Van Persie.....or Crouch...... :facepalm:

keep beating your little stats argument tho

by AttacanteBG Mon Oct 03, 2011 8:45 pm

He can cross and he can shoot.

by Lex Mon Oct 03, 2011 8:48 pm

Oh ok, so anyone who picks Walcott is a biased Arsenal fan (Immaculate_Mole) whilst everyone who picks Bale is an unbiased, well-to-do football fan

by EarlyPrototype Mon Oct 03, 2011 8:48 pm

RealGunner wrote:
EarlyPrototype wrote:What can Xavi do that Ozil can't?

What can Kaka do that Pastore can't?

is that the only useless argument here?

Bale can do everything better than Walcott.

Only thing Walcott has better is a tad bit more pace.

Is that why Walcott scores more then bale ? Or assists more then bale ?

So then Benzema had a better season than Villa last season because he scored more than Villa?

by Lex Mon Oct 03, 2011 8:49 pm

B-Mac MUFC wrote:he played in a stronger side last year ffs.....Nasri, Fabregas, Van Persie.....or Crouch......

Where were VDV, Modric, Defoe, Gallas during all of last season?

by EarlyPrototype Mon Oct 03, 2011 8:50 pm

omarish wrote:
EarlyPrototype wrote:What can Xavi do that Ozil can't?
Control the tempo of the game

What can Kaka do that Pastore can't?
Pace? (pre injury Kaka)

is that the only useless argument here?

Bale can do everything better than Walcott.

Only thing Walcott has better is a tad bit more pace.

I think it's a valid argument, Walcott beats Bale at everything, pace, dribbling, shooting, I can go on all day

It is a shit argument. Every player can cross, every player can shoot. Doesn't mean walcott can't cross or shoot, just that..................Bale is better at everything crosses, shooting, set pieces, passing, work rate etc.. I can go on all day.

by Lex Mon Oct 03, 2011 8:51 pm

EarlyPrototype wrote:So then Benzema had a better season than Villa last season because he scored more than Villa?

More goals, more assists, more consistent performances

But that doesn't mean anything in the grander scheme of things, obviously

by Sponsored content