Daniel Sturridge to NUFC

Irish_Catalan_Scouser wrote:Mole=




Gil=

So lifelike that its uncanny

ffs you arent getting him fck off

sturridge is gonna start at the right side in a 4-3-3 and we arent getting hulk or neymar

hell cost 20m so splash that if u have anything

even then he will not leave

english_jewel wrote:ffs you arent getting him fck off

sturridge is gonna start at the right side in a 4-3-3 and we arent getting hulk or neymar

hell cost 20m so splash that if u have anything

even then he will not leave

LOL the title was made to attract attention

I am just reporting the article that was made, and imo if you were to sign even one forward it is possible Sturridge will be shoved out for a bigger name iam not saying he will iam saying that if this were to happen it's likely he would leave as he said himself he would leave if he is unable to get the minutes he deserves at Chelsea.

Also calm down

Andres Iniesta wrote:

Immaculate_Mole wrote:

Swagg_Johnson wrote:But what about Ameobi like? (Dave from Newcastle voice)

He's so good that when he scores our fan's invade the pitch, we need a striker that will score goals but not get us in trouble with the FA

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=biOcrpzcdSU

mole i didn't know you could sing

Immaculate_Mole wrote:

english_jewel wrote:ffs you arent getting him fck off

sturridge is gonna start at the right side in a 4-3-3 and we arent getting hulk or neymar

hell cost 20m so splash that if u have anything

even then he will not leave

LOL the title was made to attract attention

I am just reporting the article that was made, and imo if you were to sign even one forward it is possible Sturridge will be shoved out for a bigger name iam not saying he will iam saying that if this were to happen it's likely he would leave as he said himself he would leave if he is unable to get the minutes he deserves at Chelsea.

Also calm down

still have not lost me temper

@Mole, you invaded?

Here is how it needs to go down:

Lukaku to Chelsea. Sturridge to Newcastle. Aguero to Madrid. Benzema to Arsenal. Bentner to Newcastle.

Win, win, win, win and win.

Newcastle lose as bad as fighting Mohammed Ali, should they get Bendtner.

Won't even fill Carroll's boots.

Sushi Master wrote:Here is how it needs to go down:

Lukaku to Chelsea. Sturridge to Newcastle. Aguero to Madrid. Benzema to Arsenal. Bentner to Newcastle.

Win, win, win, win and win.

Demba Ba >>> Bendtner ( as a target man)

HBA playing behind Sturridge = Explosion of Sex on Grass

Immaculate_Mole wrote:

kick mars wrote:Lol Mole, you watch, we won't let him go. if we do it won't be till aug at the earliest.

There's a difference between you not wanting him to go and what the club will do......

It's almost certain you will buy 2 forwards which mean's Sturridge would be on his way out he said himself that if he's not going to play he will leave.

Beside's iam aware it wont happen immediately, the article says we want him to sign him on loan with a view to a permanent deal.

The thread title was done to create attention

Haha... you wish! We wont buy two forwards firstly, first team players that is. Lukaku aint gonna be a starter anytime soon. We might get one forward, to fill in at LWF. Sturridge will play RWF, RF. Anelka, Kalou and Malouda would probably leave as well.. we cant sell Sturridge under those circumstances :cyclops:

AND I HOPE WE WONT

The most important thing is that Chelsea have zero trust in their youth players. It's all a smoke screen; Chelsea will continue to pay over the odds for players. FACT!

iNFINITY9910 wrote:

Immaculate_Mole wrote:

kick mars wrote:Lol Mole, you watch, we won't let him go. if we do it won't be till aug at the earliest.

There's a difference between you not wanting him to go and what the club will do......

It's almost certain you will buy 2 forwards which mean's Sturridge would be on his way out he said himself that if he's not going to play he will leave.

Beside's iam aware it wont happen immediately, the article says we want him to sign him on loan with a view to a permanent deal.

The thread title was done to create attention

Haha... you wish! We wont buy two forwards firstly

AND I HOPE WE WONT

That's the key lol, you hope there's no indication of Chelsea wanting to keep Sturridge

Welcome to NUFC Daniel

SUPERCARTTS wrote:The most important thing is that Chelsea have zero trust in their youth players. It's all a smoke screen; Chelsea will continue to pay over the odds for players. FACT!

You're clueless. FACT!

english_jewel wrote:

SUPERCARTTS wrote:The most important thing is that Chelsea have zero trust in their youth players. It's all a smoke screen; Chelsea will continue to pay over the odds for players. FACT!

You're clueless. FACT!

HAHAHAHA. You're the same guy that couldn't explain the outcome of what would happen if Abramovich stopped giving "gifts" in the form of multi-million pound signings in the form of players, to Chelsea. If you explain how I'm clueless then I'll give you a cookie..

Ben Arfa, Sturridge, and Ba playing together would be nice to watch.

Double post woops.

Immaculate_Mole wrote:

iNFINITY9910 wrote:

Immaculate_Mole wrote:

kick mars wrote:Lol Mole, you watch, we won't let him go. if we do it won't be till aug at the earliest.

There's a difference between you not wanting him to go and what the club will do......

It's almost certain you will buy 2 forwards which mean's Sturridge would be on his way out he said himself that if he's not going to play he will leave.

Beside's iam aware it wont happen immediately, the article says we want him to sign him on loan with a view to a permanent deal.

The thread title was done to create attention

Haha... you wish! We wont buy two forwards firstly

AND I HOPE WE WONT

That's the key lol, you hope there's no indication of Chelsea wanting to keep Sturridge

Welcome to NUFC Daniel

You! Thats not what I said

SUPERCARTTS wrote:The most important thing is that Chelsea have zero trust in their youth players. It's all a smoke screen; Chelsea will continue to pay over the odds for players. FACT!

John Terry(No need to explain)... Carlton Cole(Can be a great striker on his day, inconsistent though)... Glen Johnson(doing very well at Liverpool)... Frank Lampard(He was quite young when we got him)...

New lads on the way, Josh McEachran, Parick Van Aanholt, Jeffrey Bruma, Gael Kakuta, Ryan Bertrand...

newcastle united who?

The xcx wrote:newcastle united who?

Well, sir, first of all you should probably be saying "Newcastle United, what is that?" as "who" refers to a person - although I guess that on a multinational Internet forum one may mistake Newcastle United as someone's name. I hope I managed to clarify this perhaps confusing matter.

But to answer your honest question, Newcastle United are a football club based in Newcastle upon Tyne in England, which is in the United Kingdom. Please note, that although the word "united" features in both of these names, United Kingdom is not a football club as Newcastle United are not a sovereign state (or a loose union of states).

Newcastle United were founded in 1892 and have won four First Division titles (that was a football league) and six FA Cups. They are perhaps a surprisingly big and vastly supported club with long traditions and have never dropped below English football's second tier, despite the best efforts of their current owner Mike Ashley, who is widely rumoured to be dreaming of one day bringing the Johnstone's Paint trophy to Newcastle.

I hope this has answered Your question to a satisfactory extent.

Consectatio Excellentiae

iNFINITY9910 wrote:

SUPERCARTTS wrote:The most important thing is that Chelsea have zero trust in their youth players. It's all a smoke screen; Chelsea will continue to pay over the odds for players. FACT!

John Terry(No need to explain)... Carlton Cole(Can be a great striker on his day, inconsistent though)... Glen Johnson(doing very well at Liverpool)... Frank Lampard(He was quite young when we got him)...

New lads on the way, Josh McEachran, Parick Van Aanholt, Jeffrey Bruma, Gael Kakuta, Ryan Bertrand...

Down wind me up! Besides John Terry, it's kind of hard to justify the others. Cole made 25 apps in 6 seasons; Johnson made 41 apps in 4 season; Lampard is the only one to justified his position.

Those new lads don't get a sniff. They've been at Chelsea long enough to at least taste Carling Cup action, right? Wrong! They've been loaned out left right and centre. Mancienne got smoked blown up his arse year after year now he's playing for Hamburg Don't let me have to reel of all the "lads" Arnesen brought in for millions of pounds. Complete failure right there!

iNFINITY9910 wrote:

SUPERCARTTS wrote:The most important thing is that Chelsea have zero trust in their youth players. It's all a smoke screen; Chelsea will continue to pay over the odds for players. FACT!

John Terry(No need to explain)... Carlton Cole(Can be a great striker on his day, inconsistent though)... Glen Johnson(doing very well at Liverpool)... Frank Lampard(He was quite young when we got him)...

New lads on the way, Josh McEachran, Parick Van Aanholt, Jeffrey Bruma, Gael Kakuta, Ryan Bertrand...

Terry made into Chelsea team before Roman came in.And Lampard was bought from west ham as an established player for 11mil.As SUPERCARTTS said Chelsea have zero trust in their youth players and wont allow them to develop.

Do Chelsea fans even know who was the last chelsea player to came through Chelsea academy and establish into the first team?Even Terry was bought from west ham as a youth player.

SUPERCARTTS wrote:

iNFINITY9910 wrote:

SUPERCARTTS wrote:The most important thing is that Chelsea have zero trust in their youth players. It's all a smoke screen; Chelsea will continue to pay over the odds for players. FACT!

John Terry(No need to explain)... Carlton Cole(Can be a great striker on his day, inconsistent though)... Glen Johnson(doing very well at Liverpool)... Frank Lampard(He was quite young when we got him)...

New lads on the way, Josh McEachran, Parick Van Aanholt, Jeffrey Bruma, Gael Kakuta, Ryan Bertrand...

Down wind me up! Besides John Terry, it's kind of hard to justify the others. Cole made 25 apps in 6 seasons; Johnson made 41 apps in 4 season; Lampard is the only one to justified his position.

Those new lads don't get a sniff. They've been at Chelsea long enough to at least taste Carling Cup action, right? Wrong! They've been loaned out left right and centre. Mancienne got smoked blown up his arse year after year now he's playing for Hamburg Don't let me have to reel of all the "lads" Arnesen brought in for millions of pounds. Complete failure right there!

look im not going to say in any way shape or form that chelsea have any ability what so ever of inegrating youth players into the first team, although i think we do do a great job of making kids (11 yr olds) into to promising 19yr olds, but thats a story for another day, what i would like to do is point out the relativley unproven players chelsea took on who went on to become greats and/or play for big clubs

1) Eduir gudjohnsen
bought him for 4mil for blackburn and sold him for 15mil to barcelona, in his time at chelsea he played 196 games for 54 goals in 6yrs his second highest goal/game ratio at any club (he went 39 goals in 44 games at Valur Reykjavík in 1995)

2) Soloman Kalou
picked him up for 9mil from Feyenoord where he wanst concidered an important player in the Feyenoord squad (the season before he moved to chelsea Feyenoord loaned him out) since Kalou has gone on to score more goals off the bench then any other chelsea player ever

3) Mikel
before he made his move to chelsea he'd made 6 senior apperances, all of which were for lyn, a norwegian football team. he is now one of the best DMs in the PL and a regular in the chelsea XI

4) Frank Lampard
all though a regular in the hammers XI before his move he was still unproven in europe and hadnt played for a club as big as chelsea

5) John Terry
chelsea youth product

6) Arjen Robben
sold at a 17mil profit robben was picked up still young and unproven at an elite level from PSV, after a few seasons he then moved onto RM and later to munich. One of the bets wingers in the world right now, but really made a name for himself at chelsea

7) Joe Cole
once upon a time he was a quality footballer, moved to chelsea after hammers got relegated and proved alot of the hype that surrounded him, an important member of chelseas premiership winning side under mou and a part of an england world cup squad

now in no way am i saying chelsea have 1% of the youth production power and ability that sides like Ajax, sporting etc have but heres some proof that chelsea doesnt buy all its talent and that it does elevate players from hyped youngsters to world class footballers

EDIT
Peter Cech
moved from rennes as a youngster and established himself at a time where chelsea were going from mid table mediocrity to title contenders in arguable the hardest position to play

Chelsea fans are full of it, mate. Gael Kakuta will go down as another failure.

What made me piss myself was the reports that claimed Sturridge would go back out on loan if they signed Lukaku- how does that even make any fecking sense?!

Sturridge is proven, whereas Lukaku is some beastly kid from Belgium- but yet they're prepared to put trust in an untested kid over a now proven player in Sturridge. Oh shit, just realsed what it was...Lukaku is going to cost near £20m whereas Sturridge was a freebe

BeautifulGame wrote:Terry made into Chelsea team before Roman came in.And Lampard was bought from west ham as an established player for 11mil.As SUPERCARTTS said Chelsea have zero trust in their youth players and wont allow them to develop.

Do Chelsea fans even know who was the last chelsea player to came through Chelsea academy and establish into the first team?Even Terry was bought from west ham as a youth player.

terry moved to chelsea in 1995, thats 16 years ago and hes 30 now
so 30-16=14
lets not pick at straws here he moved when he was 14, although i must say i didnt know that