Summer Transfer Rumours Mk.II

Spanish publication AS reporting that Manchester City & Sevilla have agreed a deal for Jesús Navas; £25m fee touted

Yeah right, you're not going to believe thousands of sources but instead basing your argument on just one source that isn't even reliable and that post doesn't even look authentic lol.

RealGunner wrote:Spanish publication AS reporting that Manchester City & Sevilla have agreed a deal for Jesús Navas; £25m fee touted

Nasri's city days over?

ExtremistEnigma wrote:Yeah right, you're not going to believe thousands of sources but instead basing your argument on just one source that isn't even reliable and that post doesn't even look authentic lol.

Liverpool FC's official site is not authentic

It'll be a sad day when Navas leaves Sevilla, but he deserves a chance at a bigger club. Hopefully it'll be a nice quick sale with a big fee heading Sevilla's way.

Would be good if they could get Gio dos Santos in as a replacement.

GoonerJay29 wrote:Sad day when Navas leaves Sevilla, but he deserves a chance at a bigger club. Hopefully it'll be a nice quick sale with a big fee heading Sevilla's way.

I agree but 25 million pounds is not what I thought Navas would cost lol

Looks like Del Nido still has a talent for pimping his players very well.

Zealous wrote:

ExtremistEnigma wrote:Yeah right, you're not going to believe thousands of sources but instead basing your argument on just one source that isn't even reliable and that post doesn't even look authentic lol.

Liverpool FC's official site is not authentic

But it's not the LFC's official site. Some independent fan site. Unless you can see those images that are supposed to be the proof documents of the balance sheets that the official website posted. For some reason I can't see them, would you be so nice as to share it with us.

Zealous wrote:

ExtremistEnigma wrote:Yeah right, you're not going to believe thousands of sources but instead basing your argument on just one source that isn't even reliable and that post doesn't even look authentic lol.

Liverpool FC's official site is not authentic

Check again.

Let it go Z... a few days ago, the pitchforks were out when Nick dared suggest that Suarez had said he didn't like England in an interview. Now, it's blasphemy that, according to data published by Liverpool officially, a Liverpool blogger extrapolated the actual transfer fee for Alonso.

If i have the time, i'll dig up the annual report for Real Madrid that year. It's public info. They should show the transfer fees paid.

St Etienne released a statement today saying Aubameyang has a release clause but wouldn't reveal how much.

Anyone know more about this?

Let's just agree for a moment that the fansite has posted legitimitate data.

Why is it not found at any other pages? Most of the times, if data is authentic, it is duplicated and available at multiple websites. I can't seem to get any other search result that is supporting this claim.

I'm not saying that site is Liverpool's site ffs. The actual info from Liverpool's site.



Here is a screen shot from another article. 29.7 million pounds for those three players. You can go check the actual accounts which I'm sure would back all this up.

The real transfer fee was never confirmed to the press and Madrid don't do instalments or bonuses. The difference between 24 and 30 isn't that much anyway so you guys need to lighten up.

That's not what they said. ASSE said that Aubameyang is free to look for offers and has the club's blessing to do so... Officially, the are looking for between €12-€15 mil to sell him.

Adit wrote:well more than right money lol but DMeelan also once were doing transfers just like Madrid when they Berlusconi had the money

I suppose you can fault Milan for being stingy alright lol, not for being complete tools on the market like Madrid , who probably think twice if they are going to spend less than 20m on a player lol

The difference is , when Milan used to spend big , very rarely overpaid . Perhaps the 30m for Rui Costa .. and that was because Terim was Berlusconi's new found love and wanted to satisfy him lol

@ As for your monetizing on players Sports , yeah sure , go monetize on Coentrao now lol.

The only players we over paid for since Flo came back were Kaka, Coentrao and Modric and two of those guys were players Mourinho pushed for heavily.

Cristiano has pretty much paid for himself already. The Kaka deal was probably the worst transfer of all time but I don't think you actually mind that one lol

Anyway Madrid obviously has a bad rep (probably deserved rep if I'm honest) but I really do think we've gotten better and we hardly ever low ball other clubs and don't pay in instalments. It's pretty much why other clubs put up with Madrid

Atletico Mineiro's president Alexandre Kalil says there is English interest in attacking midfielder Bernard.

The Brazilian has been linked previously with Chelsea, but Kalil refused to be drawn on the name of the club.

Kalil said: "I have talked directly with the president of an English club, which are the club who are closest to signing him.

"Some time ago a German club came here and talked with me but we didn't talk about a value. Then, they left."

Bernard has one cap for the senior Brazil side.

sportsczy wrote:That's not what they said. ASSE said that Aubameyang is free to look for offers and has the club's blessing to do so... Officially, the are looking for between €12-€15 mil to sell him.

Oh right seems like the person i got it from got the translation wrong, or just straight lied

Just so you know...

Mohammed Ali ‏@mohammedali_93 7h
Saint-Etienne release statement amidst rumours- say they aren't required to sell, and Aubameyang has a release clause

Mohammed Ali ‏@mohammedali_93 7h
Saint-Etienne statement: "All club players have a contract to comply with, any departure requires the approval of the management and coach."

Mohammed Ali ‏@mohammedali_93 7h
Saint-Etienne statement: "Only one player - Pierre Emerick Aubameyang has a release clause - the club will not comment on unfounded rumours"

Let me know if this is BS or not.

He is one of the most reliable guys i know. It's not BS

Tito: "Thiago is Barça's future and we'd like it if he stayed on with the Club "

Zealous wrote:The only players we over paid for since Flo came back were Kaka, Coentrao and Modric and two of those guys were players Mourinho pushed for heavily.

Cristiano has pretty much paid for himself already.

Cristiano paid himself quickly enough yes on and off the field. Not saying what Sports said doesn't work , because it does , but will not always with just every other expensive transfer.

RealGunner wrote:Tito: "Thiago is Barça's future and we'd like it if he stayed on with the Club "

"We'd like him to stay" vs "He will stay"

Get on it Flo ffs

Dante wrote:

Zealous wrote:The only players we over paid for since Flo came back were Kaka, Coentrao and Modric and two of those guys were players Mourinho pushed for heavily.

Cristiano has pretty much paid for himself already.

Cristiano paid himself quickly enough yes on and off the field. Not saying what Sports said doesn't work , because it does , but will not always with just every other expensive transfer.

I agree with you.

Seems relevant....

barcastuff ‏@barcastuff 7h
Thiago has offers from Chelsea, City, Man United and Bayern. He didn't yet decide if he'll stay or leave. Madrid not an option for him. [md]

Zealous wrote:
Anyway Madrid obviously has a bad rep (probably deserved rep if I'm honest) but I really do think we've gotten better and we hardly ever low ball other clubs and don't pay in instalments. It's pretty much why other clubs put up with Madrid

true , i don't mind we lost Kaka and we were miserable after that
As for the installments , i have to agree , it's pathetic really lol. But it can be the only solution sometimes , for both clubs evolved.

30 million euros for navas? loooool

City and their all spanish attack

navas-silva-isco
kun.

Aguero? Wot?