Robinho or Pato?

BiasedMilanFan3 wrote:

ildiavoliforeva wrote:I'd prefer Pato! He's is younger and has greater room for improvement! Robinho's misses on the other hand !

According to that logic, what about Inzaghi?

Inzaghi is 38. If he were a couple of years younger, than he should have been starting! Pato on the other hand is much younger than Inzaghi and Robinho! If he can avoid his injuries and play reguraly, he can definitely improve his game! Robinho though is not improving his finishing as we have seen in the last few seasons, and in games on this level, you simply cannot afford to miss oppertunities like Robinho does (see tottenham, see barca)! Despite the fact that he is more creative and runs more, he lacks one of the basic qualities an attacker must possess!

For a good team, it is important to field the correct players at the correct time.

I would assume the majority of fans would pick the player who fits their image of success more adequately but in the end all i can say is that be wise.

They seem to be unreliable in some cases, robinho never really established him self as the player, many thought he would become, dont let that happen to pato.

take care of your players, and they will take care of buisness.

Welcome to the Milan section Il Capitano!

Forza Rossoneri wrote:Welcome to the Milan section Il Capitano!

thank you for your greetings.

I'm a fan of football, plainly put.

Milan is a team with history and i respect that.It will be interesting to see how they pan out this season. I wish you all great luck.

Safe to say Pato had a shocker, Robinho didn't do much either once called upon.

Tough game today

Did anyone catch the article on goal.com about how we should be selling Pato? Kris Voakes is a joke. Pato>Robinho

Robinho can leave and Tevez can join

Read that myself, another one of goal.com's wonderful articles

I still Think we should throw Pippo in the mix after the game started.

plus what happened to Elsharawy