Next Manchester United manager?

Robespierre wrote:1999-2009

I believe it.

Firenze wrote:either you're a complete numpty or just fishing for replies (it's the former with you, always)

we can and will attract the elite of the elite, same as always

he has little budget at Spurs, has reached a ceiling with them

and we finished above them in the table last season, as we did you

Great Leader Sprucenuce wrote:Except it's completely fucking nonsense. Mourinho consistently made his players worse.

Where as everyone in the top 6 is making the players they have better than they were before they managed them.

Guardiola, Klopp, Sarri, Pochettino and Emery, all of them have taken the talent they have to degreeing levels and improved them.

Mourinho has made them worse, that alone is a sackable offence. Anyone who refuses to see this and open their eyes to evidence in front of them can bury their heads in the sand if they want but just know you ain't living in reality.

Oh to answer the question directly, what would Pochettino do with Lukaku ? He probably wouldn't buy him to begin with because you know Mourinho actually bought him, you don't get to buy a player and be absolved of blame when said player doesn't perform.

As for Fellaini, he only plays because Mourinho is a dinosaur and prefers kicking people over actual talent. They have much better options who are totally ignored because Mourinho is incapable of actually coaching attacking football so again Fellaini wouldn't play under Pochettino.

Never knew there were so many people who want to make excuses for a manager who has failed to stop his players regressing much less improving them.

Because you know the no 1 job of a manager which he failed to do so spectacularly.

Firenze wrote:I'd give Ole props for that but 2 glaring questions

1) he's talking in English when presumably the vast majority of his side speak the same native language as him

futbol wrote:

Great Leader Sprucenuce wrote:Except it's completely fucking nonsense. Mourinho consistently made his players worse.

Where as everyone in the top 6 is making the players they have better than they were before they managed them.

Guardiola, Klopp, Sarri, Pochettino and Emery, all of them have taken the talent they have to degreeing levels and improved them.

Mourinho has made them worse, that alone is a sackable offence. Anyone who refuses to see this and open their eyes to evidence in front of them can bury their heads in the sand if they want but just know you ain't living in reality.

Oh to answer the question directly, what would Pochettino do with Lukaku ? He probably wouldn't buy him to begin with because you know Mourinho actually bought him, you don't get to buy a player and be absolved of blame when said player doesn't perform.

As for Fellaini, he only plays because Mourinho is a dinosaur and prefers kicking people over actual talent. They have much better options who are totally ignored because Mourinho is incapable of actually coaching attacking football so again Fellaini wouldn't play under Pochettino.

Never knew there were so many people who want to make excuses for a manager who has failed to stop his players regressing much less improving them.

Because you know the no 1 job of a manager which he failed to do so spectacularly.

Making excuses for Mourinho? Me? I started the Sack Thread before he was officially appointed.

Mourinho's usual 3rd season meltdown doesn't change the fact that United have been mismanaged from board level for years.

First appointing van Gaal - then Mourinho, the complete opposite of van Gaal style-wise. What's the thought process behind this from board level?

Signing bunch of has beens like Schweinsteiger, Ibra, Falcao, Di Maria, Valdes just because of their names.

Signing straight up frauds and donkeys like Fellaini, Schneiderlin, Depay, Rojo etc.

Plus fraudulent leftovers of the SAF era like Young, Jones, Smalling.

Has there been a worse transfer history of any big club ever?

The one true elite talent they signed is an overrated manchild.

Mourinho has also failed but let's not act like this is a squad that should be competing. Getting 2nd last season with these players was the best anyone could have done in a season when City collected 100 points.

Great Leader Sprucenuce wrote:

As i said it's the no 1 mandate for any manager and he failed to do it spectactularly, when a manager fails to do so the rest of the stuff is completely irrelevant.

Hapless_Hans wrote:

Firenze wrote:I'd give Ole props for that but 2 glaring questions

1) he's talking in English when presumably the vast majority of his side speak the same native language as him

LMAO I thought the same

I actually at first thought that maybe the soundtrack was manipulated and they put someone else talking onto the images of Solskjaer training

Unique wrote:

Firenze wrote:either you're a complete numpty or just fishing for replies (it's the former with you, always)

we can and will attract the elite of the elite, same as always

he has little budget at Spurs, has reached a ceiling with them

and we finished above them in the table last season, as we did you

as of right now spurs are better than you. have a very good squad a great team spirit. you have 450mil worth of shit. your keeper is the only player worth keeping. it would take poch 3 years to clear out the dead wood and get manure to where spurs are now and thats if he gets 3 years. also if you can get the elite of the elite then why did you hire 3 scrubs since fergie left. you are not in the big 5 anymore buddy get used to it.

Firenze wrote:

Unique wrote:

Firenze wrote:either you're a complete numpty or just fishing for replies (it's the former with you, always)

we can and will attract the elite of the elite, same as always

he has little budget at Spurs, has reached a ceiling with them

and we finished above them in the table last season, as we did you

as of right now spurs are better than you. have a very good squad a great team spirit. you have 450mil worth of shit. your keeper is the only player worth keeping. it would take poch 3 years to clear out the dead wood and get manure to where spurs are now and thats if he gets 3 years. also if you can get the elite of the elite then why did you hire 3 scrubs since fergie left. you are not in the big 5 anymore buddy get used to it.

450m worth of shit finished above you and spurs last season you complete dolt

we aren't in the top 5 halfway through this season, we can finish top 4 with the right manager, just as we did last year, BUDDEH

Arquitescu wrote:Imagine going from RedOranje to Unique as the defence of GL for Liverpool.

Not the best look.

RO

Unique wrote:

Arquitescu wrote:Imagine going from RedOranje to Unique as the defence of GL for Liverpool.

Not the best look.

RO

i remember that guy. he left the forum like a pussy because a few people had a different opinion to his. yep thats the kind of guy you want to defend something.

Arquitescu wrote:

Unique wrote:

Arquitescu wrote:Imagine going from RedOranje to Unique as the defence of GL for Liverpool.

Not the best look.

RO

i remember that guy. he left the forum like a pussy because a few people had a different opinion to his. yep thats the kind of guy you want to defend something.

RO left because he had commitments to disabled him from posting here.

No one on this forum could take him on whether it came to LFC or in general as we all were shredded to ribbons when it happened, me included.

Huge loss for the LFC section.

Unique wrote:

Arquitescu wrote:

Unique wrote: i remember that guy. he left the forum like a pussy because a few people had a different opinion to his. yep thats the kind of guy you want to defend something.

RO left because he had commitments to disabled him from posting here.

No one on this forum could take him on whether it came to LFC or in general as we all were shredded to ribbons when it happened, me included.

Huge loss for the LFC section.

you mean the guy had the personality of a dead fish. and your right no one could take him on because he was admin and would just dock you 25% if he didnt like what you said.

Arquitescu wrote:That, is just completely false on both counts.

Many others here can attest otherwise.