Prime Villa vs Suarez

Prime villa for me, and it isnt even that hard. Was pretty much goat in any competition and was so clutch in big games. If u say suarez is more creative and more of a hard worker, i'd understand u, but saying that villa needs to be 'fed'? Lol, what does that even mean? By that logic, suarez is better than cr7 too? I've seen suarez being fed a million times & that doesnt change anything.
Aside creativity (which includes dribbling) and hardwork, villa pretty much trumps suarez in anything else. Its also worth notin that villa is a far superior finisher and wonder what suarez would have done in that strict tiki-taka system (not this modified counter-taka one).

Sorry bout multiple posts pls.

Donuts wrote:but in that argument suarez is not a big game player like villa is..
villa has been more clutch in games.

Suarez not being a big game player is massive myth that's only going about in GL. Guy is the epitome of a big game player if you ask me.

i'm not saying he's not, but when you compare to villa it seems like he is, not really a jab at suarez more praise of villa.

He was the best player in the world as a winger, then he reinvented himself as a forward and became the best player in the world again, is leading La Liga's assist playing in the same era and same league as Messi, yet, somehow, he's an one dimensional scrub poacher

Back on topic I think Villa is a much better forward and goalscorer. Suarez might be slightly better at dribbling and delivering the final ball but I'm starting to think he's a not a good finisher. If we exclude the Dutch "heaven in earth for every striker" league, he's been as lethal and clutch as Villa ever was only last season, in the other Pool seasons and now at Barca he's been extremely wasteful in front of goal.

Surprised at the responses.
As good as prime Villa was,Suarez is a couple of levels above Villa.Suarez is a Messi level player and was the best player in the world last season.Something Villa never was.
IMO it is not even close.Suarez by a country mile.

The only thing Villa has over Suarez is finishing tbh.

alexjanosik wrote:Surprised at the responses.
As good as prime Villa was,Suarez is a couple of levels above Villa.Suarez is a Messi level player and was the best player in the world last season.Something Villa never was.
IMO it is not even close.Suarez by a country mile.

and u only reply the day after Suarez scores a bicycle kick?
Btw, Suarez is a couple of levels above villa?
Can't believe what I'm reading.

alexjanosik wrote:Surprised at the responses.
As good as prime Villa was,Suarez is a couple of levels above Villa.Suarez is a Messi level player and was the best player in the world last season.Something Villa never was.
IMO it is not even close.Suarez by a country mile.

Alex smh

When we say better what do we mean? Villa has done more but Suarez has more ability.

Both are WC but Villa won so much more than Suarez that he's the greatest of thw 2. Suarez's got 5 years to win titles.
Villa is very clutch as is Suarez imo but he has to show it again at Barca.

Suarez has won as much as Villa outside of Barca.

Give him 3 years at Barca and he'll probably win nearly as much as Villa.

For instance, Djimi Traore has won the CL and R9 hasn't. That metric should really not be considered when comparing two players. Winning is dependent, above all, on what sort of teams you played in and what sort of teammates and coaches you had.

villa has world cup and euro cup
la liga in atletico

suarez has
copa america............. and dutch cups?

Villa won a lot of titles but not only that he was very important in those wins. @Don't call me James your argument is wrong

i thought team rather than individual win you a title

if you said give a big influence toward winning a title, i agree on that

guest_07 wrote:i thought team rather than individual win you a title

In which case, this argument that "Villa had to be fed, while Suarez can do it alone" is completely redundant

Yeah but at the end of the day, Arsenal legend >>> a midget with a goatee.