Barcelona looking toothless

baresi wrote:

harhar11 wrote:

danyjr wrote:
The "B team" that cost Madrid €200+ million

correct me if i'm wrong, but didn' t that team cost Real Madrid more than Barca's?

You are 100% right, and thats why they beat Barca, quality is not for free...

We lose = all that money for nothing
We win = all that money for a win

Da faqqq?

FalcaoPunch wrote:

Harmonica wrote:

FalcaoPunch wrote:
Butthurt

Madrid fans?

There is no reason for me to be butthurt. Or any Madrid fans.

But why are they acting like it, going personal in every post, like you just did?

Yes it is RG Valdes said it was so it must be

Adriano dived, simple as that.

Freeza wrote:TBH I don't see any clear contact

After watching it from this angle, the referee made the right decision imo.

Harmonica wrote:

FalcaoPunch wrote:

Harmonica wrote:Madrid fans?

There is no reason for me to be butthurt. Or any Madrid fans.

But why are they acting like it, going personal in every post, like you just did?

We won? How am I butthurt?
I'm not getting "personal" I'm stating the current situation.

izzy wrote:Yes it is RG Valdes said it was so it must be

yooooo Good to see u back

Se7en wrote:Can we discuss how a B-lineup from Madrid wins Barca's starting xi? hahahahahha CR didn't even start ffs

It wasn't their starting 11.

Freeza wrote:TBH I don't see any clear contact

0:09 you can see there was contact, sure he exagerated but there is definitely contact.

Btw, I just read Ramos interview after the game and he kind off like admits that it's a penalty because he didn't want to give a straight answer to whether or not it was a foul.

FalcaoPunch wrote:

Harmonica wrote:

FalcaoPunch wrote:

There is no reason for me to be butthurt. Or any Madrid fans.

But why are they acting like it, going personal in every post, like you just did?

We won? How am I butthurt?
I'm not getting "personal" I'm stating the current situation.

You are butthurt with the manner it came, as I stated in the first post. You just can't deal it, so you go personal.

Se7en wrote:Can we discuss how a B-lineup from Madrid wins Barca's starting xi? hahahahahha CR didn't even start ffs

...but didn't your starting line-up cost more than ours?

harhar11 wrote:

Freeza wrote:TBH I don't see any clear contact

0:09 you can see there was contact, sure he exagerated but there is definitely contact.

Btw, I just read Ramos interview after the game and he kind off like admits that it's a penalty because he didn't want to give a straight answer to whether or not it was a foul.

Ramos intended to make a fault, no doubt about that, but it wasn't a fault at the end because he did not touch him.

If Adriano did not dive like that he would have had an opportunity. Barcelona relying on last minute dive in the box is not a good sign for them.

harhar11 wrote:

Se7en wrote:Can we discuss how a B-lineup from Madrid wins Barca's starting xi? hahahahahha CR didn't even start ffs

...but didn't your starting line-up cost more than ours?

...and didn't your starting line-up cost more than ours?

harhar11 wrote:

Se7en wrote:Can we discuss how a B-lineup from Madrid wins Barca's starting xi? hahahahahha CR didn't even start ffs

...but didn't your starting line-up cost more than ours?

madrid should have to apologize for being the most profitable in the world.

sorry for spending money, didnt know it was against the rules.


when are barca fans going to take this reply out of the deck?

Ramos didn't say that. He said, I don't know if there was contact or not - I'd have to see the images.

As far as I'm concerned it was a penalty. No wonder it wasn't called though. Given the reputation he has for falling down easily, the way he makes the most of it... It could have worked at Camp Nou but not away from home in the dying minutes.

Typical of Ramos to almost *bleep* it up again though. He finally does something great by scoring that impressive header but he could have ended up ruining all of that.

P.S. Varane was a beast again. He's one of the reasons Missi isn't feeling very well. I've been vouching for this kid for a while now.
P.P.S. Callejon was average/poor in attack but he worked like a horse and deserves more credit.
P.P.P.S. Bravo Morata.
P.P.P.P.S. This might be a turning point for Modric. Finally.

I seriously fail to see your point harhar... what does that have to do with Barca being toothless, do you have to always feed on minnows to show your superiority?

Harmonica wrote:

FalcaoPunch wrote:

Harmonica wrote:But why are they acting like it, going personal in every post, like you just did?

We won? How am I butthurt?
I'm not getting "personal" I'm stating the current situation.

You are butthurt with the manner it came, as I stated in the first post. You just can't deal it, so you go personal.

Aside from saying "butthurt" which is said all the time on this forum, I have yet to see what was so "personal"

harhar11 wrote:

Freeza wrote:TBH I don't see any clear contact

0:09 you can see there was contact, sure he exagerated but there is definitely contact.

Btw, I just read Ramos interview after the game and he kind off like admits that it's a penalty because he didn't want to give a straight answer to whether or not it was a foul.

Another week, another situation that has to be shown multiple times. It a clear foul as they come, even if it isn't a touch, which it is, it's a clear obstruction.

FalcaoPunch wrote:

Harmonica wrote:

FalcaoPunch wrote:

We won? How am I butthurt?
I'm not getting "personal" I'm stating the current situation.

You are butthurt with the manner it came, as I stated in the first post. You just can't deal it, so you go personal.

Aside from saying "butthurt" which is said all the time on this forum, I have yet to see what was so "personal"

Yes and it's a personal remark.

Senor Penguin wrote:As far as I'm concerned it was a penalty. No wonder it wasn't called though. Given the reputation he has for falling down easily, the way he makes the most of it... It could have worked at Camp Nou but not away from home in the dying minutes.

Agreed it was a penalty, but when has Adriano ever "fallen down easily"?

Great sig btw, loved that moment. CR caught in the act.

Butthurt is a personal remark? What next? LOL is a racist term?

Albiceleste wrote:

Senor Penguin wrote:As far as I'm concerned it was a penalty. No wonder it wasn't called though. Given the reputation he has for falling down easily, the way he makes the most of it... It could have worked at Camp Nou but not away from home in the dying minutes.

Agreed it was a penalty, but when has Adriano ever "fallen down easily"?

Great sig btw, loved that moment. CR caught in the act.

wat

Harmonica wrote:

FalcaoPunch wrote:

Harmonica wrote:You are butthurt with the manner it came, as I stated in the first post. You just can't deal it, so you go personal.

Aside from saying "butthurt" which is said all the time on this forum, I have yet to see what was so "personal"

Yes and it's a personal remark.

So sorry. So sensitive.
This just validates your hurtbutt

Se7en wrote:

Albiceleste wrote:

Senor Penguin wrote:As far as I'm concerned it was a penalty. No wonder it wasn't called though. Given the reputation he has for falling down easily, the way he makes the most of it... It could have worked at Camp Nou but not away from home in the dying minutes.

Agreed it was a penalty, but when has Adriano ever "fallen down easily"?

Great sig btw, loved that moment. CR caught in the act.

wat

It was when CR won a foul from a dive

baresi wrote:

harhar11 wrote:

Se7en wrote:Can we discuss how a B-lineup from Madrid wins Barca's starting xi? hahahahahha CR didn't even start ffs

...but didn't your starting line-up cost more than ours?

...and didn't your starting line-up cost more than ours?

...yeah and they used the tactics that all the lesser talented side uses when they play a more talented team a.k.a Catenaccio..

izzy wrote:Ramos didn't say that. He said, I don't know if there was contact or not - I'd have to see the images.

That's what I meant. He knows whether or not there was contact because he was THERE, but he didn't say if there was or if there wasn't, meaning that he didn't want to give a straight answer. So I ask you, if you know that there was not any contacts, why would you say that you need to see the images?

To me it seems a little weird..