Shame on Juve opting for a quick fix. What are we causing ?

nyluigi wrote:Let's look at the whole picture:
Marco Motta 25
Paolo De Ceglie 24
Frederik Sorensen 19
Leonardo Bonucci 24
Arturo Vidal 24
Claudio Marchisio 25
Milos Krasic 26
Alessandro Matri 26
Not to mention the pups: Pasquato 22, Ekdal 22, Giandonato 19, Boniperti 19, etc... It's a good base to build for the future.

Good point although Motta doesnt belong here

The difference between Juve and the teams like ManC and RM is that sadly Juve doesn't have huge money on one or two players.
The difference between Juve and the teams like Parlemo and Udinese is that luckily Juve doesn't have to finance the team by selling their best players.
This situation decides Juve's market strategy. Juve doesnot particularly aim young players, or being young is not one of the major consideration for Juve. Besides, a player at age of 27-31 is not old at all.

if we don't fix quickly the club will be turned into Udinese or Lazio 2-3 yrs ago ...we all wanted to be back well ...plus i don't find this players Quick fix

I agree with pasquale, Marotta tends to delay signing quality players and when it becomes too late, he panic signs sh*t players for a sizable amount not worth their sh*tness.... that is our problem...

elmystique wrote:I agree with pasquale, Marotta tends to delay signing quality players and when it becomes too late, he panic signs sh*t players for a sizable amount not worth their sh*tness.... that is our problem...

Aquilani
Krasic
Quagliarella

After August 20th

Martinez- End of June
Pepe- June
Motta- June

Buying old-ish players is often the sign of middle- and low-table clubs; They need quality from somewhere, but good young players tend to move to big clubs. So they buy 28+ players who are good, but won't be a long-term solution nor have much re-sale value.

Juventus, however, have got the money and are a big club.
If getting those very good young players now is too difficult, it probably is the best to buy older ones, try and get back to the top (Champions League places) and then start buying young stars again when it's easier.

Art Morte wrote:Buying old-ish players is often the sign of middle- and low-table clubs; They need quality from somewhere, but good young players tend to move to big clubs. So they buy 28+ players who are good, but won't be a long-term solution nor have much re-sale value.

Juventus, however, have got the money and are a big club.
If getting those very good young players now is too difficult, it probably is the best to buy older ones, try and get back to the top (Champions League places) and then start buying young stars again when it's easier.

I agree.
There are too many holes to fill.
Say Juventus finish third and have a 60M budget next summer, already being in the CL.
They can then spend that 60M on 2 or 3 players of higher quality.