the official Dwayne Wade <<<<<< you thread

dmize wrote:Thomas Robinson to Houston for whichever Morris Houston had.

Gotta love the Kings.. take a PF #5 overall, barely play him and then trade him in his rookie year.

LOL

No real big deals yesterday...

Celtics got Jordan Crawford for an injured Barbosa and Jason Collins.Crawfords playing tonight for us.

And JJ Redick got traded to the Bucks.

Celtics wanted Brooks, Teletovic, Humphries and two 1sts for Paul Pierce from the Nets. Why didn't they take the #5 overall last year?!

KG wouldn't waive his no trade clause, or else Ainge probably would've sent him to LAC for Jordan/Bledsoe. CP3 called him and said if he wants to come there, he'll make it happen.

OUR SLEEVED JERSEYS MAKES THEIR DEBUT TONIGHT

I got home 15 minutes ago and I just caught the end of this Golden State game - poor defensive execution by Barnes on that final play, you simply cannot give up a lay up so easily.

What a massive win. Clutch So happy right now.

Jack seemed to be on fuego. Congratulations on the win, Messiah.

Thanks Dom. Maybe those sleeved jersey are a blessing.

dmize wrote:No real big deals yesterday...

Celtics got Jordan Crawford for an injured Barbosa and Jason Collins.Crawfords playing tonight for us.

And JJ Redick got traded to the Bucks.

Celtics wanted Brooks, Teletovic, Humphries and two 1sts for Paul Pierce from the Nets. Why didn't they take the #5 overall last year?!

KG wouldn't waive his no trade clause, or else Ainge probably would've sent him to LAC for Jordan/Bledsoe. CP3 called him and said if he wants to come there, he'll make it happen.

Crawford seems a good pick up, I mean his age alone he gives you a chance he might be something good.

Pierce for that? Man...I know he is old but thats not nearly enough.....good that didnt go throught IMO

Yeah if the Nets weren't contenders then the 1st round picks would be good, but as they are, they might as well be 2nd rounders.

Shoulda dealt him last year for the #5, huge huge mistake not to.

Bill Russell

Now Im all new to NBA and stuff. Can someone recommend me an successful club to support or bandwagon.

Lakers or Boston.

They have won by far the most titles.

But if you want to jump on the bandwagon of someone who is good right now and the next 2-3 years, Miami Heat.

Sounds good Il choose between Boston or Heat, now what about the game times, is it like 3am/4am for my time zone? :/

Yeah, more or less. Some 1 or 2am games too.

Sunday is your best bet, they are always much earlier..though, they can clash with football.

Nameless, if you want to watch entertaining basketball, watch Warriors.

Does anyone else think the Thunder would of been better off moving Westbrook out and keeping Harden? I think they might of been better for it if they had.

The Franchise wrote:Does anyone else think the Thunder would of been better off moving Westbrook out and keeping Harden? I think they might of been better for it if they had.

It's really hard to say imo, I would have loved for the 4 of them to stay, ffs Harden wanted like 4 million more? But then again who is to say Westbrook wouldn't have evolved to a different level if being the main option (some would argue he already is, or that he makes himself the no. 1 option).

The Franchise wrote:Does anyone else think the Thunder would of been better off moving Westbrook out and keeping Harden? I think they might of been better for it if they had.

My friends and I talk about this often.. I think Harden is better than Westbrook, I would have kept him instead.. I think Westbrook has more upside but he may also never reach his potential

You know what you're getting with Harden

That Sac v Miami game last night was crazy, caught the game from the start of the second half.. Glad I did

I dont think Westbrook would of "broke out" like Harden...because Harden was in a much lesser role, so he needed a stage, more room.

Westbrook already has that freedom, he shoots whenever he likes and does whatever he likes.

I too like Swag, think Harden is better than Westbrook.

I dont even know if Westbrook has more upside either, I dont know Westbrook already isnt at his best...

I understand why they didnt keep Harden and didnt even consider Westbrook, I dont blame them...but it might of been a mistake.

I think they could of plugged in a point guard as a complementary player very easily next to Harden, Durant, Sef and Ibaka for the end of games and it would be unguardable..the team would probably flow much better and I bet they would turn the ball over much less. They currently the 2nd highest in the league in terms of turnovers...no chance in hell of beating the Heat turning it over like that.

I mean, plug a point guard who is pass first and can shoot from distance...all he has to be is a decent defender and that could be real scary.

You might be right but we have the benefit of hindsight atm. The Thunder management probably had a sour taste in their mouth after Harden's no show in the finals. Their decision may have been influenced by that just a little. When I first heard they traded Harden I was really surprised, I mean sure he wasn't great in the finals but he was in the play off games prior to that...

Westbrook is a great player but I just don't think he has "it". He's rash, mentally unstable and from a tactical stand point a square peg in a round hole. Like you said a defensively sound pass first PG could theoretically do wonders for the Thunder.

DAT SIG Zealous!!

True, this is all in highsight. I dont blame the Thunder one bit for their decisions...but I dont blame the Rockets for taking Hakeem over Jordan either, both were common sense moves.

CURRY 54 points New career high

And this after he had 38 points in his last game.

I f*cking love him

I wouldn't mind these Harlem Shake videos if they weren't called the Harlem Shake.. Since well, it isn't the Harlem Shake lol

It's like me getting a bunch of people together, recording us doing a bunch of random shit, and then calling the video The Moonwalk