PL Manager of the Season

Vote.

Trick question?

Tony Pulis.

Palace were dead and buried before he took over. Not only did he guarantee them prem safety, he had them competitive picking up points nearly every week. They also play some decent football.

Palace fans call the club Crystal Pulis for a reason   

either Rodgers or Martinez. Yeah pulis didn't great but we've seen many times a manager come around and safe a club from relegation. it's harder to get them up there.

Rodgers, no doubt.

No love for Poyet?

Pulis

Rodgers

Poyet

Martinez

Personally I voted for Pulis. With his points average (1.51) Palace would have finished 8th, one point above Southampton, over 38 games (he was in charge for 27 games). For a newly promoted team whose biggest transfer in the summer was Gayle for £4.5m that's just amazing.

For my own satisfaction: Moyes

Any of Rodgers/Pulis deserves it, but I hate Pulis so Rodgers for me.

I can't consider Pulis.... for how great he's done, he's only been relevant for 3 months lol.

Poyet is getting far too much credit IMO, Sunderland were 11th in Febrauary and he allowed them to go on an awful run to put them back into relegation troubles.... credit for getting them back out of it but manager of season credentials? puhhhlez

The only real candidates are Pellegrini, Martinez and Rodgers and i like to look at it like this who has overachieved the most? the answer is Rodgers.

Pulis

Pelle and Rodgers seem to be very close but Rodgers still will take it by few points because Liverpool were actually contending for the title after finishing 7th in the last season

1. Rodgers
2. Pelle
3. Martinez/Pulis

Voted Brendan Rodgers.

Pulis for me

Definitely Rodgers. Expected Liverpool to scrape a CL place this season, instead he mounted a title challenge and almost won the league.

Big Poppa Pulis.

moyes for me. He had earned the hearts of the 17 other teams in the league

Pulis.

We see a lot of managers getting results under pressure while bein midtable, Doesnt mean you reward them for being relevant for 2 months. Poyet has as much say as Pulis. Between Rodgers and Pellegrini.

Meh, Man City were favourites by far. Had an infinite budget and already the best squad in the league along with Chelsea. Only, unlike Chelsea they had a wealth of strikers that could actually score. They barely won the league.

Not that impressed with Pelle at all.

By the way, I think Mark Hughes deserved a shout out. I mean, here we are praising Pulis yet it was Hughes who took Pulis' old club to their best ever Premiership finish and points total with a 33-year-old Peter Crouch (7 goals) their first-choice striker and Charlie frigging Adam their top scorer with 8 goals.

pellegrini

achieve in 1st year what mancini had achieved in 3rd year

guest_07 wrote:pellegrini

achieve in 1st year what mancini had achieved in 3rd year

mancini also built the entire squad that pellegrini used this year to win

worst reasoning ever

it has to be Moyes.

B-Mac wrote:

guest_07 wrote:pellegrini

achieve in 1st year what mancini had achieved in 3rd year

mancini also built the entire squad that pellegrini used this year to win

worst reasoning ever

thanks for the info

guest_07 wrote:

B-Mac wrote:

guest_07 wrote:pellegrini

achieve in 1st year what mancini had achieved in 3rd year

mancini also built the entire squad that pellegrini used this year to win

worst reasoning ever

thanks for the info

lol Mancini came in with nothing, and had to build the squad

Pellegrini had a ready made championship contender

you using Mancini's need for 3 years to win the title to justify a manager of the year selection for Pellegrini is hilarious