Re: Liverpool For the title Support Thread

by Blue Mon Mar 31, 2014 3:06 am

Fußball wrote:Is this even a question, fss.

Oil money + Mourinho or more oil money or a traditional European powerhouse? Fss.

smh i can never understand this mentality. Why are european football fans so sympathetic to traditional clubs.

In any American sports you don't find this mentality. Lakers, Boston, Yankees, Cowboys, etc are absolutely hated by neutrals.

sigh elitist mentality Laughing

by Blue Mon Mar 31, 2014 3:10 am

Great Leader Sprucenuce wrote:
Fußball wrote:Is this even a question, fss.

Oil money + Mourinho or more oil money or a traditional European powerhouse? Fss.

If you lived in England you would understand why its a question and why a lot of neutrals don't want Liverpool to win it.

Which is why i'm part of Team Oil Money

Liverpool For the title Support Thread - Page 3 Mynigga-o

by El Chelsea Fuerte Mon Mar 31, 2014 3:26 am

Sorry, but I hope Liverpool do not win the league. From a neutral perspective, however, they should go all out in their remaining games because next season may not be possible for them to win it. But yeah, I prefer City.

by Milan31 Mon Mar 31, 2014 4:06 am

IN!!!

Liverpool For the title Support Thread - Page 3 Suarez-dive

by serieAkings Mon Mar 31, 2014 4:14 am

I'm more in than Suarez' teeth in Ivanovic.
Liverpool For the title Support Thread - Page 3 ItKM4qhR0X8KH

by El Chelsea Fuerte Mon Mar 31, 2014 4:26 am

serieAkings wrote:I'm more in than Suarez' teeth in Ivanovic.

ROFL suarez you nut

by BarcaLearning Mon Mar 31, 2014 4:46 am

Wow, didnt know that many fans liked Liverpool, good to see. Although they've still got not easy games left, vs both Chelsea and Man City, its going to be tight. If they win all thjeir remaining games, how many games winning streak would it be?

I still think Chelsea got the easiest fixtures left, but as everyone, dont want them to win, mainly becos of Mou Razz

by Hapless_Hans Mon Mar 31, 2014 8:24 am

CBarca wrote:Not really sure what it is about Liverpool that has annoyed me so much the last year or so, but I used to really like Liverpool. Not as much anymore.

Still, I like Liverpool more than the likes of Chelsea, Man City, and Man U. Now that Arsenal is out of it, sign me up.

That they got AVB fired, maybe? hmm

by free_cat Mon Mar 31, 2014 8:44 am

The priority is that Chelsea doesn't win the title at any cost. I would gladly take a Manchester City title. But I would love Liverpool to win a league 20 years afterwards and with a much limited budget thant heir opponents. So I'm basically in.

Suarez :bow:

Rodgers

Sturridge

by Red Alert Mon Mar 31, 2014 11:20 am

Valkyrja wrote:
chinomaster182 wrote:Luis Suarez

I just can't get enough

we could have had him for 40m in the summer

No you wouldn't have. Laughing

You could of maybe had him for 50, but not as low as 40, no.

by Nishankly Mon Mar 31, 2014 11:55 am

pls red not this thread let it go.

also gtfo from this thread chelsea fans :facepalm:

by Hapless_Hans Mon Mar 31, 2014 12:26 pm

Red Alert wrote:
Valkyrja wrote:
chinomaster182 wrote:Luis Suarez

I just can't get enough

we could have had him for 40m in the summer

No you wouldn't have.

You could of maybe had him for 50, but not as low as 40, no.

45 and we have a deal? Very Happy

by Abramovich Mon Mar 31, 2014 12:34 pm

by Nishankly Mon Mar 31, 2014 12:48 pm

stay mad

by Helmer Mon Mar 31, 2014 12:52 pm

RA always has his sword up, putting it in wherever he can :bow:

by Abramovich Mon Mar 31, 2014 1:15 pm

Cultural misinterpretations sure are strange.

by lszanto Mon Mar 31, 2014 1:22 pm

Nishank wrote:pls red not this thread let it go.

also gtfo from this thread chelsea fans

go liverpool!

by iftikhar Mon Mar 31, 2014 4:17 pm

45 and we have a deal?

45+Shaqiri+Manduzik+Kroos...ok, you may have a shot.

In case you don't know, his release clause for non-EPL teams is GBP 70 million.

by BeautifulGame Mon Mar 31, 2014 4:58 pm

iftikhar wrote:
45 and we have a deal?

45+Shaqiri+Manduzik+Kroos...ok, you may have a shot.

In case you don't know, his release clause for non-EPL teams is GBP 70 million.

Actually that 70 mil clause that only kicks in if we failed to finish in top 4 this season . Now that CL is confirmed that clause is invalid

by Hapless_Hans Mon Mar 31, 2014 6:14 pm

iftikhar wrote:
45 and we have a deal?

45+Shaqiri+Manduzik+Kroos...ok, you may have a shot.

In case you don't know, his release clause for non-EPL teams is GBP 70 million.

Well, you're driving a hard bargain. We have a secret weapon in this though, and it is called P. Guardiola Wink

by iftikhar Mon Mar 31, 2014 6:19 pm

Hapless_Hans wrote:
iftikhar wrote:
45 and we have a deal?

45+Shaqiri+Manduzik+Kroos...ok, you may have a shot.

In case you don't know, his release clause for non-EPL teams is GBP 70 million.

Well, you're driving a hard bargain. We have a secret weapon in this though, and it is called P. Guardiola

We got two lunatics, Rodgers 'n Henry bounce

by Curtinho Mon Mar 31, 2014 6:24 pm

Yesterday, 50 years ago to the day Liverpool beat Tottenham to go atop the league and win the first of three titles with Shankly.

Liverpool are top of the league today after ~~pillaging~~ beating Tottenham.

Dare to dream? Are you superstitious? I believe.

by Hapless_Hans Mon Mar 31, 2014 6:26 pm

iftikhar wrote:
Hapless_Hans wrote:
iftikhar wrote:

45+Shaqiri+Manduzik+Kroos...ok, you may have a shot.

In case you don't know, his release clause for non-EPL teams is GBP 70 million.

Well, you're driving a hard bargain. We have a secret weapon in this though, and it is called P. Guardiola

We got two lunatics, Rodgers 'n Henry

I wasn't talking about our manager though hmm

by DeletedUser#1 Mon Mar 31, 2014 6:28 pm

Pep Guardiola on Liverpool: "I'm happy Liverpool are coming back, they are awesome. It'll be good for the Champions League next season."

From BBC Sport:

PEP HAS JOINTED THE BANDWAGON :bow:

by Hapless_Hans Mon Mar 31, 2014 6:30 pm

Pep always says what I said a day before, we are close :coffee:

by ExtremistEnigma Mon Mar 31, 2014 6:30 pm

Hapless_Hans wrote:
Red Alert wrote:
Valkyrja wrote:

we could have had him for 40m in the summer

No you wouldn't have.

You could of maybe had him for 50, but not as low as 40, no.

45 and we have a deal?

by Sponsored content