Cavani > Falcao

Unless you're going to average a goal p/g like Messi & Cristiano do, I'm taking the better footballer over the striker with a slightly better goal-record every time.

As great as Falcao is he's not impacting the game unless he's scoring.

There's a reason any sane human being would take strikers like Henry, Drogba, Prime R9 and other players of that ilk over strikers with superior goal records in RVN, Inzaghi, Sheva etc

As Arq alluded to Cavani is more of a footballer than Falcao.

Gil wrote:Unless you're going to average a goal p/g like Messi & Cristiano do, I'm taking the better footballer over the striker with a slightly better goal-record every time.

As great as Falcao is he's not impacting the game unless he's scoring.

There's a reason any sane human being would take strikers like Henry, Drogba, Prime R9 and other players of that ilk over strikers with superior goal records in RVN, Inzaghi, Sheva etc

As Arq alluded to Cavani is more of a footballer than Falcao.

Off the record Gil, I can't agree about Sheva and Inzaghi.

Sheva was more of a Benzema than Higuin as he frequently was involved in link up plays, 1-2 and always had heavy influences on the game.

Inzaghi people seem to misunderstand as Pippo was always used more for his clutch ability to win games in the highest moments of pressure which is why it was so hard marking him out.

A more apt example would be Huntelaar, Butregueno, Owen.

But I agree on the rest as I've seen you prefer your strikers to be more complete and influential which is why you like Torres who has evolved that part of his game since his move to Chelsea.

Falcao is so much better, and not a c*nt either.

Falcao!

Albiceleste wrote:Falcao is so much better, and not a c*nt either.

Falcao isn't so much better, not at all. Cavani is not far behind him.

Doesnt matter if Cavani is more complete than him ,both players' primary role is to score goals and Falcao is superior to him in that aspect and its not like Falcao is a mug with the ball.

Both overrated.