Re: Why dont Arsenal buy Kaka?

by REWB Wed Mar 20, 2013 3:11 am

that bumb

by Lex Wed Mar 20, 2013 3:19 am

A few years too late. Like Huntelaar, Villa and a medley of other players we COULD have had in their prime, but got discouraged from buying by the additional £1.58 surcharge

by furiouswindbottom Wed Mar 20, 2013 4:51 am

1. He's old.
2. He's not the player he was...and going downhill.
3. He would cost 200k per week.
4. Cazorla and Wilshere are better and younger.
5. If we're gonna spend 200k on a player's wages there are better options.

by Wilson37 Wed Mar 20, 2013 6:52 am

First of all he is 29 years old and he is past his prime.. And some were talking about business mentioning shirt sales... Not many clubs beat our club in making profits every year..
Do you think Kaka is still worth 30million.. And it is foolish to think that we will make out his high transfer cost or his wages from extra shirt sales...
10 million and 100k wages..? Will think about it then...