Why dont Arsenal buy Kaka?

I think a deal can be arranged for Arsenal to get him for 30Mil, Is 30Mil too much for him? I dont think so. I mean he would be your AM, playmaker, and his playing style suits you, and he really still has 2 to 3 good years in him and he would sell you so many shirts, i would be one of those who'd buy the Arsenal Jersey if Kaka joins arsenal for example and i am sure milllions will do the same.

So all in all, its a good bargain which might or might not work (just like everything else). This is business and in business there is always risk and reward but i am pretty sure the odds are that this deal would break even at least if everything goes bad.

So for 30 - 35Mil, Arsene and Arsenal should at least make a move and show interest and Madrid might listen because they know they cant sell Kaka for more than 35 Mil.

Because their transfer record is still below 20M pounds?

BarrileteCosmico wrote:Because their transfer record is still below 20M pounds?

But records are made to be broken, i know what you re saying but this is good business and i know Arsene is great at doing Business. We are talking about KAka here.

I would sure love to see him play for a club like Arsenal. I have an intuitive feeling that he will do miracles with them.

There is no way Wenger would spend big money on KAKA. His wages must be over 200k easy.

First of all the transfer number, next his insane wages and finally that he's pretty much past it and there are tens of better players to go after.

i would love him

but wages , those huge wages are a massive spoiler

Okay. I see a pattern here. No one's interested from the fans.
I thought you guys would be making twice the money he'd cost you to buy.
Wages can be discussed i am sure.

The day Wenger spends 30 is the day he makes a bid for Messi.

>Arsenal
>£30mil

Are you having a laugh?

aleumdance wrote:i would love him

but wages , those huge wages are a massive spoiler

He's not playing football for the wages anymore. A kind of agreement / arrangement can be reached.

huntsman wrote:

aleumdance wrote:i would love him

but wages , those huge wages are a massive spoiler

He's not playing football for the wages anymore. A kind of agreement / arrangement can be reached.

I dont think so, he is at age that he wants a big money and he can do that at PSG or Money City. Why go to Arsenal for lower wages when you can go and rape Money city for 300k a week and never play.

huntsman wrote:

aleumdance wrote:i would love him

but wages , those huge wages are a massive spoiler

He's not playing football for the wages anymore. A kind of agreement / arrangement can be reached.

I know

buy what of his agents?

Agents are like parasites, they love to suck out froma good meat

if City comes for the deal, arsenal should forget kaka

Kaka is what, 29 now? Splashing £30mil on him would be the same as Chelsea splashing £30mil on Shevchenko not long ago - completly and utterly pointless usage of that much money. It was okay for Chelsea to spend that much, because they could. But can we? No, not really. At least, not on an aging star suspectable to injury.

Raptorgunner wrote:

huntsman wrote:

aleumdance wrote:i would love him

but wages , those huge wages are a massive spoiler

He's not playing football for the wages anymore. A kind of agreement / arrangement can be reached.

I dont think so, he is at age that he wants a big money and he can do that at PSG or Money City. Why go to Arsenal for lower wages when you can go and rape Money city for 300k a week and never play.

This is Kaka we're talking about, not Cristiano. Did Arsenal at least make the slightest move? No they didnt. Kaka prefers to play for clubs with History. Remember when he said early this season when the press started talking about him joining Inter; he told them he would never do that kind of thing to Milan and that it's almost like betrayal.

What decline are you talking about? Sure he's not as good as his milan days, but he s still one of the best out there.

GoonerJay29 wrote:Kaka is what, 29 now? Splashing £30mil on him would be the same as Chelsea splashing £30mil on Shevchenko not long ago - completly and utterly pointless usage of that much money. It was okay for Chelsea to spend that much, because they could. But can we? No, not really. At least, not on an aging star suspectable to injury.

That's almost how old Drogba was, when Chelsea bought him. He can easily give you 2 to 3 years in return.

£30mil for just two years? No thanks. There are wiser investments out there.

And again, Chelsea had surplus amounts of cash back then. We don't.

huntsman wrote:

Raptorgunner wrote:

huntsman wrote:

aleumdance wrote:i would love him

but wages , those huge wages are a massive spoiler

He's not playing football for the wages anymore. A kind of agreement / arrangement can be reached.

I dont think so, he is at age that he wants a big money and he can do that at PSG or Money City. Why go to Arsenal for lower wages when you can go and rape Money city for 300k a week and never play.

This is Kaka we're talking about, not Cristiano. Did Arsenal at least make the slightest move? No they didnt. Kaka prefers to play for clubs with History. Remember when he said early this season when the press started talking about him joining Inter; he told them he would never do that kind of thing to Milan and that it's almost like betrayal.

What decline are you talking about? Sure he's not as good as his milan days, but he s still one of the best out there.

We cant afford to pay 30 million, but we would love to get him on a loan.

getting him on loan in fact isnt a bad idea but i dont think Madrid would accept that, because they'd lose his money value. I dont think Kaka would be given on loan.

But then again Arsenal might be calculating it like that:

1) PL is too difficult to win, let's secure a top 4 position and we can do that with or without Kaka
2) Kaka wont be able to help us in the CL this season
3) Press and fans / management will start questioning him about his policies and how he broke them for an aging star at a time where he iisnt needed instead of buying a younger star, and he would be crucified if the deal went wrong like in the event Kaka got a chronic injury or something.

It's not gonna happen, you re right, but its not because of the 30mil or the wages. Its mostly because of the reasons i mentioned above.

there will be a time when arsenal will start throwing more money into the market.

Still if Arsenal can get him on loan that would be pretty cool imo to me at least.

GoonerJay29 wrote:£30mil for just two years? No thanks. There are wiser investments out there.

And again, Chelsea had surplus amounts of cash back then. We don't.

think about the shirt sales

St_Nick09_of_Goal wrote:

GoonerJay29 wrote:£30mil for just two years? No thanks. There are wiser investments out there.

And again, Chelsea had surplus amounts of cash back then. We don't.

think about the shirt sales

Kaka doesn't have even have half the reputation he did once Madrid bought him.

Plus, it's England.

I would love kaka, really i would. But 30m ? Too much

A loan move would be perfect.

Kaka isnt past it either. but it doesnt make much sense to buy him. doesnt make much sense for us to buy gourcuff either, but that's a whole nother story. I hope i have to eat my words on that one.

St_Nick09_of_Goal wrote:

GoonerJay29 wrote:£30mil for just two years? No thanks. There are wiser investments out there.

And again, Chelsea had surplus amounts of cash back then. We don't.

think about the shirt sales

Won't do any good Nick, with ticket price at the Emirate, fans would be busting their nuts for a game, not those shirt.