Re: Still not scandal in La Liga? part deux

by Bellabong Sat 22 Oct - 17:51

A thread complaining about bad refs in La Liga :coffee:

Barcelona is involved. *grabs popcorn*

by The Verminator Sat 22 Oct - 17:52

Because he went down. He may not be able to continue running but that doesnt mean you go down

by harhar11 Sat 22 Oct - 17:52

The Verminator wrote:
I can tell how hard it was and ill tell ya what, that was not a soft tackle. He swung pretty hard. It woulda hurt - definetely. WHether he could have continued running that's debatable.

The whole point of my arguement however, was that Iniesta dived. That's all i'm saying

But I don't understand why Iniesta would dive in that situation when he could have stayed up and squared the ball to messi, who would have a open net to score.

Please answer that..

by Harmonica Sat 22 Oct - 17:54

The Verminator wrote:Because he went down. He may not be able to continue running but that doesnt mean you go down

Oh wow. So if your leg got hit, no matter how hard, it's a dive if you go down? That's one hell of a definition of a dive.

by The Verminator Sat 22 Oct - 17:54

You may have spotted Messi free but did Iniesta? That's the question.

by harhar11 Sat 22 Oct - 17:56

The Verminator wrote:You may have spotted Messi free but did Iniesta? That's the question.

He aint blind..

by Zealous Sat 22 Oct - 17:58

This is perfect proof of how video technology would solve absolutely nothing in football.

People are going to see what they want to see 10 times out of 10.

by Harmonica Sat 22 Oct - 18:00

Zealous wrote:This is perfect proof of how video technology would solve absolutely nothing in football.

People are going to see what they want to see 10 times out of 10.

Actually it would solve diving. Just because fans aren't able to admit it, doesn't mean everybody wouldn't accept it in their head.

by The Verminator Sat 22 Oct - 18:01

It was towards the game right? He's trying everyhting he can to win the game, trying to dribble past players, adrenaline rushing to his head, you don't have to be blind to miss an open player in these circumstances

by The Verminator Sat 22 Oct - 18:04

jiopsi wrote:
The Verminator wrote:Because he went down. He may not be able to continue running but that doesnt mean you go down
Oh wow. So if your leg got hit, no matter how hard, it's a dive if you go down? That's one hell of a definition of a dive.

A dive is when you go down when there is no contact, or little contact, or contact that does not make you fall over.

by Harmonica Sat 22 Oct - 18:06

The Verminator wrote:
jiopsi wrote:
The Verminator wrote:Because he went down. He may not be able to continue running but that doesnt mean you go down
Oh wow. So if your leg got hit, no matter how hard, it's a dive if you go down? That's one hell of a definition of a dive.
A dive is when you go down when there is no contact, or little contact, or contact that does not make you fall over.

You know it's also a foul even if you don't fall down right?

by harhar11 Sat 22 Oct - 18:07

The Verminator wrote:It was towards the game right? He's trying everyhting he can to win the game, trying to dribble past players, adrenaline rushing to his head, you don't have to be blind to miss an open player in these circumstances

Iniesta has great awereness and he can handle pressure very well, hence why he is almost always our best performers on the big matches. I have no doubt that he saw messi. He has some done similiar passes before.

by The Verminator Sat 22 Oct - 18:08

Yea and the only reason it's not part of the debate is because Iniesta didn't stay up......

by The Verminator Sat 22 Oct - 18:10

He does have great awareness but so does Fabregas and i've seen him do something rather than squaring it to a free player before. This stuff happens man

by Harmonica Sat 22 Oct - 18:11

The Verminator wrote:Yea and the only reason it's not part of the debate is because Iniesta didn't stay up......

So it wasn't a foul because he fell?

by The Verminator Sat 22 Oct - 18:18

It may noot have been a foul even if he stayed up. But coz he dived it made it 100% no foul.

by Harmonica Sat 22 Oct - 18:18

The Verminator wrote:It may noot have been a foul even if he stayed up. But coz he dived it made it 100% no foul.

Well this is now ridiculous. I hope you are joking here though. Laughing

by The Verminator Sat 22 Oct - 18:22

Hold up bro. If you dive, which Iniesta did( the contact was not enough for him to go down) it's no foul, straight up.

by Harmonica Sat 22 Oct - 18:25

Well you aren't. Neutral

by The Verminator Sat 22 Oct - 18:29

I got a point man. If the contact isn't enough to take you down, but you do go down, it's no penalty

by Harmonica Sat 22 Oct - 18:34

More like a logical impossibility.

by barca 2011 Sat 22 Oct - 18:34

The Verminator wrote:I got a point man. If the contact isn't enough to take you down, but you do go down, it's no penalty

Dude, its called selling it and every team is more than guilty of doing it at least once. Or does this never happen? It's just funny how Barcelona has a questionable PK today, in a match we didn't even win and the forum just loses it.

by The Verminator Sat 22 Oct - 18:41

JUst coz every team sells, it doesn't mean that selling becomes a normal part of the game that shouldn't go unpunished.

And the forum didnt lose it. Jiopsi created this thread ffs

by Harmonica Sat 22 Oct - 18:42

The Verminator wrote:And the forum didnt lose it. Jiopsi created this thread ffs

Because forum lost it. Wink

by The Verminator Sat 22 Oct - 18:45

Fair enough then Jiopsi.
So we end this arguement here? We been debatin for hours Laughing

by Harmonica Sat 22 Oct - 18:45

Sure.

by Sponsored content