Still not scandal in La Liga? part deux

St_Nick09_of_Goal wrote:Where is the scandal? I see 3 dives

Take off the Reaf Madrid classes. lol

On second thought I have seen the light, the player who dared to approach Initesticle should have also been executed on the spot or better yet his head should have been used for the spot kick instead of the ball.

Never mind two extra steps were taken before he fell to his knees faster than a two dollar ho.

Nice try at the "I trapz U wiz my logics LOL" but I was never part of the "refcelona mantra". I'm part of the you guys are sore losers who try their best to provoke and influence the referees mantra.

All in all if you want to come off as the victim in a conspiracy try harder than posting three dives and saying "stonewall". At least Super_Floren was kind of funny when he did it.

jiopsi wrote:

Zealous wrote:Also if I'm honest all you really did was post three dives LOL

Let the butthurt flow.

Let the butthurt flow? You open up a new thread every week on how there's a scandal in La Liga against Barce ffs.

jiopsi wrote:You might remember me such threads as scandal in la liga revealed, and still not scandal in la liga? https://goallegacy.forumotion.com/t10299-still-not-scandal-in-la-liga?highlight=scandal

Again, three obvious penalties, only one given:

Obstruction, could have gotten the loose ball from Alves:



Clear penalty, didn't get the ball first:



Also the last one was clear penalty, hit in the ankle:



So that's what 11 stonewalls 1 given, Madrid gotten 4 and all of those were dubious or dives.

I applaud you for trying, but you're not gonna change the opinions of the general forum. You're just gonna get bashed more. That's why I don't really post here much. The only time we'll get recognized as a legit good team is when we're no longer at the top.

The Verminator wrote:

jiopsi wrote:

Zealous wrote:Also if I'm honest all you really did was post three dives LOL

Let the butthurt flow.

Let the butthurt flow? You open up a new thread every week on how there's a scandal in La Liga against Barce ffs.

So, it's not like I don't have anything concrete to post.

jiopsi wrote:

The Verminator wrote:

jiopsi wrote:

Zealous wrote:Also if I'm honest all you really did was post three dives LOL

Let the butthurt flow.

Let the butthurt flow? You open up a new thread every week on how there's a scandal in La Liga against Barce ffs.

So, it's not like I don't have anything concrete to post.

Just don't say that others are butthurt when you're actually the one who is butthurt. Otherwise you wouldn't be making these threads would you?

Zealous wrote:On second thought I have seen the light, the player who dared to approach Initesticle should have also been executed on the spot or better yet his head should have been used for the spot kick instead of the ball.

Never mind two extra steps were taken before he fell to his knees faster than a two dollar ho.

Nice try at the "I trapz U wiz my logics LOL" but I was never part of the "refcelona mantra". I'm part of the you guys are sore losers who try their best to provoke and influence the referees mantra.

All in all if you want to come off as the victim in a conspiracy try harder than posting three dives and saying "stonewall". At least Super_Floren was kind of funny when he did it.

Yeah lets all kick as hard as we can to achillestendon, if you take one step after it, it wasn't foul.

Funny enough, Iniesta is involved in two dives, DO YOU SEE A PATTERN? lol

The Verminator wrote:

jiopsi wrote:

The Verminator wrote:

jiopsi wrote:

Zealous wrote:Also if I'm honest all you really did was post three dives LOL

Let the butthurt flow.

Let the butthurt flow? You open up a new thread every week on how there's a scandal in La Liga against Barce ffs.

So, it's not like I don't have anything concrete to post.

Just don't say that others are butthurt when you're actually the one who is butthurt. Otherwise you wouldn't be making these threads would you?

I'm not butthurt lol, I have legimite material hear, all you lot who yell refcelona, refcelona, without any clear proof or anything, that's called butthurt, which is rather strange that Madrid fans are doing it even if they now lead the league.

Freeza wrote:

jiopsi wrote:

Zealous wrote:There is honestly no point in debating this with you. You came in here with only one idea in mind.

I don't know whether to laugh or cry.

Madrid 4 penalties, I will give 1 clear shout all season.
Barcelona 1 penalty, 11 clear shouts all season.

That's 44x conversion ratio with penalties, what do you think about that?

None of the above was clear penalties, your bias is beyond belief

Zealous wrote:Also if I'm honest all you really did was post three dives LOL

xabi wrote:3 dives what do you want to prove?

come again son

St_Nick09_of_Goal wrote:Where is the scandal? I see 3 dives

Club supports: Real Madrid

Yeah, you guys aint biased

The only unbiased poster on this thread so far has been Grande_Milano he said 1 of them was a clear foul another subjective and ta dive..

Grande_Milano wrote:First-subjective
Second-hell Grosso had a more legitimate call
Third-yes, a foul

And actually the 2nd one wasn't a dive, the commentator said that there was enough contact to bring down Iniesta but that the defender got the ball little bit,very, very, very little, but he did get some of the ball.

So if I am as unbiased as possible, it wasn't a dive but it wasn't a penalty..

way to combat whiney barca threads-

shinigami99 wrote:I applaud you for trying, but you're not gonna change the opinions of the general forum. You're just gonna get bashed more. That's why I don't really post here much. The only time we'll get recognized as a legit good team is when we're no longer at the top.

We get it, we are not worthy of your posts.

THAT'S the reason you don't post here.

St_Nick09_of_Goal wrote:Funny enough, Iniesta is involved in two dives, DO YOU SEE A PATTERN? lol

the pattern that I see is that you need to get your eyes checked..

harhar11 wrote:

St_Nick09_of_Goal wrote:Funny enough, Iniesta is involved in two dives, DO YOU SEE A PATTERN? lol

the pattern that I see is that you need to get your eyes checked..

But, I like seeing all the colours of the world instead of the colours that represent Barca.

jiopsi wrote:

Zealous wrote:On second thought I have seen the light, the player who dared to approach Initesticle should have also been executed on the spot or better yet his head should have been used for the spot kick instead of the ball.

Never mind two extra steps were taken before he fell to his knees faster than a two dollar ho.

Nice try at the "I trapz U wiz my logics LOL" but I was never part of the "refcelona mantra". I'm part of the you guys are sore losers who try their best to provoke and influence the referees mantra.

All in all if you want to come off as the victim in a conspiracy try harder than posting three dives and saying "stonewall". At least Super_Floren was kind of funny when he did it.

Yeah lets all kick as hard as we can to achillestendon, if you take one step after it, it wasn't foul.

Yes of course how could I forget that Mes Que Un Club also means your love for the team allows you to feel what they feel.

I bet you felt the mighty blow as if it happened to you. Poor Iniesta he is lucky to still be able to walk

Zealous wrote:

jiopsi wrote:

Zealous wrote:On second thought I have seen the light, the player who dared to approach Initesticle should have also been executed on the spot or better yet his head should have been used for the spot kick instead of the ball.

Never mind two extra steps were taken before he fell to his knees faster than a two dollar ho.

Nice try at the "I trapz U wiz my logics LOL" but I was never part of the "refcelona mantra". I'm part of the you guys are sore losers who try their best to provoke and influence the referees mantra.

All in all if you want to come off as the victim in a conspiracy try harder than posting three dives and saying "stonewall". At least Super_Floren was kind of funny when he did it.

Yeah lets all kick as hard as we can to achillestendon, if you take one step after it, it wasn't foul.

Yes of course how could I forget that Mes Que Un Club also means your love for the team allows you to feel what they feel.

I bet you felt the mighty blow as if it happened to you. Poor Iniesta he is lucky to still be able to walk

Still a foul.

For the third, Iniesta doesn't fall until he puts the leg which was caught down on the ground, so I think it's plausible that it did cause him to stumble, though spreading his wings just made it look utterly ridiculous, so I'd say 50-50, sometimes you get the call, sometimes you don't.

For the second, he goes down under minimal contact, but his leg does cross his knee. Not a stonewall penalty though.

The first I wouldn't give.

Keep this sane or it will be locked btw.

"Sane" went out the window the second this thread was made

I have the OP on my ignore so I really don't know what he said until shinigami quoted him and I just wanna know something....was that Navarro involved in 2 outta the 3 incidents?

izzy26 wrote:

shinigami99 wrote:I applaud you for trying, but you're not gonna change the opinions of the general forum. You're just gonna get bashed more. That's why I don't really post here much. The only time we'll get recognized as a legit good team is when we're no longer at the top.

We get it, we are not worthy of your posts.

THAT'S the reason you don't post here.

ok.......then......who are you again?

Doc wrote:I have the OP on my ignore so I really don't know what he said until shinigami quoted him and I just wanna know something....was that Navarro involved in 2 outta the 3 incidents?

Would you leave Navarro alone.

He's trying to change from Dirty, cheating scum to Cheating scum.

Zealous wrote:"Sane" went out the window the second this thread was made

"Sane" by Goal Legacy standards is helped by comparisons to death threats by the likes of bianconero.

shinigami99 wrote:

izzy26 wrote:

shinigami99 wrote:I applaud you for trying, but you're not gonna change the opinions of the general forum. You're just gonna get bashed more. That's why I don't really post here much. The only time we'll get recognized as a legit good team is when we're no longer at the top.

We get it, we are not worthy of your posts.

THAT'S the reason you don't post here.

ok.......then......who are you again?

Shouldn't we ask you that as you RARELY post here?

jiopsi wrote:

The Verminator wrote:

jiopsi wrote:

The Verminator wrote:

jiopsi wrote:

Zealous wrote:Also if I'm honest all you really did was post three dives LOL

Let the butthurt flow.

Let the butthurt flow? You open up a new thread every week on how there's a scandal in La Liga against Barce ffs.

So, it's not like I don't have anything concrete to post.

Just don't say that others are butthurt when you're actually the one who is butthurt. Otherwise you wouldn't be making these threads would you?

I'm not butthurt lol, I have legimite material hear, all you lot who yell refcelona, refcelona, without any clear proof or anything, that's called butthurt, which is rather strange that Madrid fans are doing it even if they now lead the league.

You call it legitimate material yet almost all of them were found to be dives, yet you keep saying they're stonewall penalties. Let's look at the examples in this thread.

The 1st on Alves is a foul ; clear and simple. He's trying to run, his toe hits the guys foot and his foot moves back and he falls over. Clear foul, i just dunno if that was in the box or not, i didn't watch the game.

The 2nd one on Iniesta is not a penalty, the guy could've just as easily stayed up on his feet. Contact from the defender was minimal. This one is debatable at best.

The 3rd is a clear dive. Seriously, Iniesta is touched he falls over. No chance of him legit falling over.

shinigami99 wrote:ok.......then......who are you again?

Quite an intelligent, witty, unbiased poster

izzy26 wrote:

Doc wrote:I have the OP on my ignore so I really don't know what he said until shinigami quoted him and I just wanna know something....was that Navarro involved in 2 outta the 3 incidents?

Would you leave Navarro alone.

He's trying to change from Dirty, cheating scum to Cheating scum.

So it was him. In that case, I agree with the OP, both were fouls and Barca should have gotten penalties for both instances. Also a puppy and a lifetime supply of Lipton Black Tea. Lipton Tea: Picks you up, let's you down...