Re: FIFA 12 Thread

by vivabarca38 Tue 7 Feb 2012 - 1:54

Do you want to play me right now on ultimate team?

by lszanto Tue 7 Feb 2012 - 1:55

vivabarca38 wrote:Do you want to play me right now on ultimate team?

Sure thing, what do you want to play? Golds, silvers or bronze.

by vivabarca38 Tue 7 Feb 2012 - 1:56

Golds..my team isnt too good though but im trying to improve it

by lszanto Tue 7 Feb 2012 - 1:58

vivabarca38 wrote:Golds..my team isnt too good though but im trying to improve it

Alright I'll use my frenchies, my PSN is Teruwah

by juventus101 Tue 7 Feb 2012 - 2:14

Youre right. Iniesta should be high. An 88 is still VERY high, but he does not deserve to be 90+. But I consider Ozil > Iniesta and Chiellini > Pique. Cant compare them as theyre different positions, but I didnt say Chiellini should be higher than Ribery so I dont know where youre getting that from. And Gotze is very young, but is mature enough to be the focal point in the Bundesliga champions attack for over a season and a half now. Thats alot of maturity for his age, so I dont think I overrated him. My ratings are great in my opinion.

by justdoit_ Tue 7 Feb 2012 - 4:49

Roster updates w/ January transfers out yet?

by vivabarca38 Tue 7 Feb 2012 - 20:56

Wtf fifa........................I bought a pack and got drogba today in the morning,i was so happy and i sold him for 53 thousand and i bought and epl team.I went to play 2 vs 2 with my friend and when i came back i couldn't find the team.......

by FalcaoPunch Wed 8 Feb 2012 - 2:36

Munian on UT>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

by EarlyPrototype Wed 8 Feb 2012 - 19:27

Abramovich wrote:2nd league title in a row danke EP

by Charrua Wed 8 Feb 2012 - 20:16

Ive decided to screw the 4231 but now idk if i should the 451 or the 4312 or maybe the 3412 If play 451

________________Lopez

Caceres____Godin_____Lugano____Alvaro
_______________Gargano
Ramirez____Forlan______Suarez_____Castro
________________Cavani

with this formation i can now use Castro who has 84 pace and dirbbling, Rodriguez whos is rather strpmg and with good stamina and crossing and martinez who has 84 dribbling, 81 headering and five star skill moves, and the other rodriguez from the mexican league who has 85 pace. And all i have to do is convert them from LWs to LMs

Now then for the 4312 the back line would be the same but then

Ramirez__Gargano__Garcia
_______Forlan
Suarez_______Cavani
In this formtion if i convert Ramirez to a cm he would playing in his position and it suits suarez and Forlan i think then playing with wide midfielders.

Now with the 3412

the back three would be
Lugano___Godin___Vicotrino/Coates/Britos/Non inform Caceres
______________________Ramirez__Gargano
Maxi/Inform Caceres__________________________________Castro
___________________________Forlan
________________________Suarez___Cavani

Now with this formation i feel id have to stop using inform caceres as hes a right back and use the regular one becuse that one is a cb and the other two cbs are slow so having him back there would provide cover. Then my left and right midfield would be Castro and Maxi . My cms Gargano and Ramireza are both quick.

Help??
/

by Albiceleste Fri 10 Feb 2012 - 1:17

Finally joined the div 1 club :dance:

by LeSwagg James Sat 11 Feb 2012 - 1:57

ANYONE who plays with 5 defenders is a little bxtch!

by RedOranje Sat 11 Feb 2012 - 4:16

Swagg_Johnson wrote:ANYONE who plays with 5 defenders is a little bxtch!

What if it's a formation that utilises wingbacks?

by justdoit_ Sat 11 Feb 2012 - 4:35

justdoit_ wrote:Roster updates w/ January transfers out yet?

by LeSwagg James Sat 11 Feb 2012 - 5:47

RedOranje wrote:
Swagg_Johnson wrote:ANYONE who plays with 5 defenders is a little bxtch!

What if it's a formation that utilises wingbacks?

You don't need 3 central defenders to utilize wing-backs... Any good FIFA player should be able to use them with 4 at the back, there's enough players on the pitch you can use to cover

by LeSwagg James Sat 11 Feb 2012 - 5:49

justdoit_ wrote:
justdoit_ wrote:Roster updates w/ January transfers out yet?

Not yet.. Probably in a week or two

by RedOranje Sat 11 Feb 2012 - 5:53

Swagg_Johnson wrote:
RedOranje wrote:
Swagg_Johnson wrote:ANYONE who plays with 5 defenders is a little bxtch!

What if it's a formation that utilises wingbacks?

You don't need 3 central defenders to utilize wing-backs... Any good FIFA player should be able to use them with 4 at the back, there's enough players on the pitch you can use to cover

Dodging the question, then?

by LeSwagg James Sat 11 Feb 2012 - 6:19

RedOranje wrote:
Swagg_Johnson wrote:
RedOranje wrote:
Swagg_Johnson wrote:ANYONE who plays with 5 defenders is a little bxtch!

What if it's a formation that utilises wingbacks?

You don't need 3 central defenders to utilize wing-backs... Any good FIFA player should be able to use them with 4 at the back, there's enough players on the pitch you can use to cover
Dodging the question, then?

I'm saying there is no need to play with 5 defenders, unless well you're a little bxtch like I said before...

by RedOranje Sat 11 Feb 2012 - 7:54

But 5 defenders does not necessarily mean a defensive approach, as I pointed out when using a formation employing wingbacks like a 3-4-3 or something similar.

You are implying/assuming that having 5 defenders is inherently defensive. Perhaps the real problem is that your attacking play is not as good as it should be.

by LeSwagg James Sat 11 Feb 2012 - 8:09

Since when is a 3-4-3 5 defenders? I'm talking about a 5-????? formation

:facepalm:

by RedOranje Sat 11 Feb 2012 - 12:46

Fullbacks, even when deployed as wingbacks, are still defenders, mate.

by LeSwagg James Sat 11 Feb 2012 - 13:46

RedOranje wrote:Fullbacks, even when deployed as wingbacks, are still defenders, mate.

I'm taking about their position on the pitch.. In FIFA if u play a 3-4-3 then u have 3 at the back and 4 in the midfield, doesn't matter if the 2 wide men are technically RBs/LBs, the flanks are exposed at the back so it's not defensive, it's offensive since your crowding the midfield and tryin to control the game.. In say 5-2-1-2 there are literally 5 players lined up with one another at the back..

by FalcaoPunch Sat 11 Feb 2012 - 15:07

5-4-1, 5-2-1-2 etc etc are all gay formations.
Especially on ultra defensive.

by LeSwagg James Sat 11 Feb 2012 - 15:38

ColoJunior wrote:5-4-1, 5-2-1-2 etc etc are all gay formations.
Especially on ultra defensive.

Yup.. Pansies.. I counter with a 3 man defense formation but it doesnt always work

Lol at my neg rep, looks like we got one of those 5 defender dudes in the forum.. Come out come out wherever you are Laughing

by Guest Sat 11 Feb 2012 - 15:44

:lol!:

My name is Dominic and I support Swagg_Johnson and his notion that those who use a 5 man defense lack testicles.

This message was brought to you by Napoli's default formation :coffee:

by Charrua Sat 11 Feb 2012 - 16:17

THC 10 wrote::lol!:

My name is Dominic and I support Swagg_Johnson and his notion that those who use a 5 man defense lack testicles.

This message was brought to you by Napoli's default formation

CoughdoesntcountCoughcough. Razz

by Sponsored content