Re: ISIS terror attacks around the world

by Unique Fri Jun 09, 2017 12:01 pm

Betty La Fea wrote:
Unique wrote:
Betty La Fea wrote:

Go stand with your people little breh. It has nothing to do with luck. Why doesnt China and Japan have these issues?

I'll go "back to China" when you go to Iran. Bring your secularism to them Breh. Go save them.
not sure about china but Japan doesn't suffer Islamic terrorism because they don't have many Muslims.

I think religion plays almost no part. Its culture.

We have, give or take, ~100,000 or so Muslims in Japan. How many do you think of them would want to meet a person in public violently for having a discussion with them on a football forum

I mean we can blame religion for a lot, but you cant blame religion for people having low cultural standards and poor home training.

https://www.infowars.com/islamic-terrorism-why-there-is-none-in-japan/

that article is old but very interesting.

by Freeza Fri Jun 09, 2017 1:50 pm

Infowars

by Kaladin Fri Jun 09, 2017 2:58 pm

Natalie Portman wrote:

But then again, I don't sink that low to glow in death of innocent people and civilians.

Natalie Portman wrote:It's such an amazing fear to see Arab countries go after each other and turn on one another.

Lovingly observing with some popcorn up the side !!

Hope it escalates between Qatar and Saudi

by Mamad Fri Jun 09, 2017 2:59 pm

United States is the biggest sponsor of terrorism. they just sold billions of weapons to Saudi which will end up on Isis hands. why on earth should US support and be friends with Saudi Arabia?

It's all about Money. USA doesn't care if every country in the world burns in flames. they are just after that oil money.

by Freeza Fri Jun 09, 2017 4:46 pm

Sepi has more personalities than James McAvoy in Split. Sadly for him, they're all racist.

by Unique Fri Jun 09, 2017 4:47 pm

Mamad wrote:United States is the biggest sponsor of terrorism. they just sold billions of weapons to Saudi which will end up on Isis hands. why on earth should US support and be friends with Saudi Arabia?

It's all about Money. USA doesn't care if every country in the world burns in flames. they are just after that oil money.

what exactly have the USA sold to terrorists. because I'm not seeing terrorists armed with M16s tomahawk missiles and state of the art drones. they seem to have plenty of Russian or Chinese made AK47s and home made IEDs

by Myesyats Fri Jun 09, 2017 5:03 pm

Freeza wrote:Sepi has more personalities than James McAvoy in Split. Sadly for him, they're all racist.

Still, he makes more sense than you ever did

by Freeza Fri Jun 09, 2017 5:14 pm

Unique wrote:
Mamad wrote:United States is the biggest sponsor of terrorism. they just sold billions of weapons to Saudi which will end up on Isis hands. why on earth should US support and be friends with Saudi Arabia?

It's all about Money. USA doesn't care if every country in the world burns in flames. they are just after that oil money.
what exactly have the USA sold to terrorists. because I'm not seeing terrorists armed with M16s tomahawk missiles and state of the art drones. they seem to have plenty of Russian or Chinese made AK47s and home made IEDs

I think the main problem is that The US have absolutely no control on their arms sales to foreign lands. They sell and sell and sell weapons to groups fighting against Isis in Syria, Iraq, and Kurdish areas. When these places are overrun Isis of course get those weapons.

The US' tactic of arming rebels and foreign forces has resulted in the terrorists getting huge arsenals and various weapons. This tactic of arming citizens of whatever country has been going on since the 70s and 80s.
That's how the later part of the war between Russia and USA was handled and how the first terrorists got armed.

It's not just the US though. Many reports suggest most of Isis' weapons come from Russia, which should be no surprise considering the morals of their leader

http://edition.cnn.com/2015/12/08/politics/amnesty-international-isis-weapons-u-s-/index.html

https://www.wired.com/2011/08/u-s-weapons-now-in-somali-terrorists-hands/

"With the U.S. effectively arming both sides of the conflict, the Somalia fighting could go on ... well, forever, absent major reform. This at a time when war-torn Somalia desperately needs some peace in order to cope with the worst drought in decades."

The whole arms trading is the worst thing about The US as I see it.

by Myesyats Fri Jun 16, 2017 8:14 pm

Russia says it may have killed ISIS leader Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi

Hopefully it's true. There's a huge possibility it's not, though, as always. At least Russia is doing something & still everyone gives them shit. USA arms them & then Russia has to clean up the mess.

by Freeza Fri Jun 16, 2017 8:15 pm

Russia arms terrorists more than any other nation.

Kalashnikovs aren't from America

by Myesyats Fri Jun 16, 2017 8:43 pm

It was the US who armed Syrians who were fighting with Assad. The US armed so many mercenaries who joined ISIS because they were paid more. US' politics is to support "democratic and civilized opposition in Syria".... so they support them, arm them, and then tomorrow they join ISIS, because they're mercenaries.

In 2014, a report by the radio broadcaster Public Radio International noted that the U.S. State Department delivered 43 Toyota trucks to Syrian rebels. God knows how many instances like these are there.

There's many examples that show how unprofessional US' politics are.

by Myesyats Fri Jun 16, 2017 8:50 pm

and BTW you can buy AK-47's on a black market in France for €1,000-€1,500 for example

Russia didnt deliver it to them. Kalashnikovs are simply their weapon of choice because they're cheap and easy to obtain pretty much everywhere

by BarrileteCosmico Fri Jun 16, 2017 9:20 pm

Myesyats wrote:Russia says it may have killed ISIS leader Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi

Hopefully it's true. There's a huge possibility it's not, though, as always. At least Russia is doing something & still everyone gives them shit. USA arms them & then Russia has to clean up the mess.

There's a news article of this guy dying every 2 weeks

by Grande_Milano Mon Jun 19, 2017 9:38 am

Some shitlording at twitter. Right in the face of Viva and Hans

"#FinsburyPark As a member of the moderate islamophobic community I deeply condemn all hatred toward islamophobes in the wake of this tragedy"

"British Nationalism is an ideology of peace. The lone wolf of #FinsburyPark clearly was NOT a British Nationalist. #ResistNationalistophobia"

by Unique Mon Jun 19, 2017 11:06 am

anyone found out his motive yet.

by LeVersacci Mon Jun 19, 2017 11:43 am

ISIS terror attacks around the world - Page 24 POWJJO8

White privilege ISIS terror attacks around the world - Page 24 Full?d=1485318460

by Freeza Mon Jun 19, 2017 11:50 am

This headline rofl

Amazing how these newspaper headlines are so hypocritical.

Clean-shaven white man arrested by police as at least 10 people are injured https://t.co/LUPrhpeSi5
— Daily Mail U.K. (@DailyMailUK) 19. juni 2017

by Unique Mon Jun 19, 2017 1:08 pm

Freeza wrote:This headline

Amazing how these newspaper headlines are so hypocritical.

Clean-shaven white man arrested by police as at least 10 people are injured https://t.co/LUPrhpeSi5
— Daily Mail U.K. (@DailyMailUK) 19. juni 2017

I'm not sure what is hypocritical about the headline tbh. it says a clean shaven white man arrested by police. was that not exactly what happened.

by Freeza Mon Jun 19, 2017 1:12 pm

Because he's a terrorist.

Let's not act like they'd write anything about his style or hair if it was a muslim or dark skinned individual.

It would be "terrorist attacks innocent white people". But since this doesn't fit the agenda they write positive words about a freaking terrorist, because he's white.

How the hell are you gonna decribe a terrorist as clean shaven before calling him what he is, a terrorist.

by Unique Mon Jun 19, 2017 1:12 pm

just have to hope this guy don't inspire other crack pots to start mowing down people coming out of mosques

by Unique Mon Jun 19, 2017 1:15 pm

Freeza wrote:Because he's a terrorist.

Let's not act like they'd write anything about his style or hair if it was a muslim or dark skinned individual.

It would be "terrorist attacks innocent white people". But since this doesn't fit the agenda they write positive words about a freaking terrorist, because he's white.

How the hell are you gonna decribe a terrorist as clean shaven before calling him what he is, a terrorist.

he is not a terrorist. he is a crack pot that thinks he is doing some kind of vigilante justice.

by Unique Mon Jun 19, 2017 1:19 pm

Freeza wrote:Because he's a terrorist.

Let's not act like they'd write anything about his style or hair if it was a muslim or dark skinned individual.

It would be "terrorist attacks innocent white people". But since this doesn't fit the agenda they write positive words about a freaking terrorist, because he's white.

How the hell are you gonna decribe a terrorist as clean shaven before calling him what he is, a terrorist.

sounds to me like they went out of the way to let everyone know he was not a dark skinned muslim. it will depend on what way people want to see it

by Freeza Mon Jun 19, 2017 1:20 pm

Unique wrote:
Freeza wrote:Because he's a terrorist.

Let's not act like they'd write anything about his style or hair if it was a muslim or dark skinned individual.

It would be "terrorist attacks innocent white people". But since this doesn't fit the agenda they write positive words about a freaking terrorist, because he's white.

How the hell are you gonna decribe a terrorist as clean shaven before calling him what he is, a terrorist.
he is not a terrorist. he is a crack pot that thinks he is doing some kind of vigilante justice.

He's a terrorist. There's no way around this.

This is the definition of terrorism: the use of violent acts to frighten the people in an area as a way of trying to achieve a political goal

Explain to me how he doesn't fit that mold.

by Freeza Mon Jun 19, 2017 1:22 pm

But yeah

Brown people = terrorists

White people = mentally people in need of help

And people pretend there isn't a white privilege Laughing

by Myesyats Mon Jun 19, 2017 1:28 pm

If you open the article you posted it literally says 'terror attacker' in the title

by Freeza Mon Jun 19, 2017 1:30 pm

Myesyats wrote:If you open the article you posted it literally says 'terror attacker' in the title

I know. I've read it. It's a huge part of the article, so I have no idea why they aren't actually writing it front and center, when we all know it would be the case the other way around.

by Sponsored content