Re: Mourinho should retire

by gnrfan Tue Apr 22, 2014 9:55 pm

no theyre overjoyed. plastics have no shame. hope abramovich assets get frozen...

by boyzis Tue Apr 22, 2014 10:00 pm

you serious abramovich doesn't want mou in charge he kicked him before he will do it again.

Mou is a like a drug will bring down chelsea to its knees

by sree999 Tue Apr 22, 2014 10:01 pm

It was embarrassment for 19 century football

by Shed Tue Apr 22, 2014 10:07 pm

boyzis wrote:i mean no offence to chelsea fans but i think even they would have not be happy with what they saw today.

Right you are. I was hoping to see us play open, restraint-less stuff and get thumped 4-0. Sure, we'd have been humiliated and effectively dumped out of the competition, but at least we'd have played moral football. Unbelievable that Mourinho would rather get a positive result than play to entertain neutrals on twitter and footy forums. What's this game coming to?

by Lord Spencer Tue Apr 22, 2014 10:08 pm

Chelsea cost around 4 times what Altetico is worth.

Incidentally, Chelsea also fielded 4 DMs in their match against Atletico. Going into the Ubber defensive against one of the greatest sides in history (Prime Barca), or when you go a man down, is understandable.

However, going with 4 bloody DMs into a match with a team that is several rungs below you in the pecking order is just pathetic. Chelsea are a CL and EL champion ffs, they should muster enough balls to have more than 4 bloody shots on target.

by Robespierre Tue Apr 22, 2014 10:09 pm

Betty La Fea wrote:You dont have to like the bus. You just have to know there is no getting pass it when he parks it.

by Arquitecto Tue Apr 22, 2014 10:09 pm

sree999 wrote:It was embarrassment for 19 century football

Agreed. I cannot stand Mouthrinho and his gutter septic tank football played by Chav$ki.

by BORUSSIA!! Tue Apr 22, 2014 10:13 pm

Shed wrote:
boyzis wrote:i mean no offence to chelsea fans but i think even they would have not be happy with what they saw today.

Right you are. I was hoping to see us play open, restraint-less stuff and get thumped 4-0. Sure, we'd have been humiliated and effectively dumped out of the competition, but at least we'd have played moral football. Unbelievable that Mourinho would rather get a positive result than play to entertain neutrals on twitter and footy forums. What's this game coming to?

That excuse was OK two years ago with 6th place league chelsea but not this current stronger chelsea with more talent and worth more. they weren't playing guardiolas barca or bayern. while this atletico team is good, they're no great attacking force and chelsea have more talent (or you would think) and shouldn't need to play this way.

by DeletedUser#1 Tue Apr 22, 2014 10:14 pm

Shed wrote:
boyzis wrote:i mean no offence to chelsea fans but i think even they would have not be happy with what they saw today.

Right you are. I was hoping to see us play open, restraint-less stuff and get thumped 4-0. Sure, we'd have been humiliated and effectively dumped out of the competition, but at least we'd have played moral football. Unbelievable that Mourinho would rather get a positive result than play to entertain neutrals on twitter and footy forums. What's this game coming to?

I know. It's IMPOSSIBLE winning trophies playing positive football. IMPOSSIBLE. Never been done before, even after spending a billion dollars that has come at cost of lives of many innocent Russian men and women.

by Arquitecto Tue Apr 22, 2014 10:17 pm

Natalie Portman wrote:
Shed wrote:
boyzis wrote:i mean no offence to chelsea fans but i think even they would have not be happy with what they saw today.

Right you are. I was hoping to see us play open, restraint-less stuff and get thumped 4-0. Sure, we'd have been humiliated and effectively dumped out of the competition, but at least we'd have played moral football. Unbelievable that Mourinho would rather get a positive result than play to entertain neutrals on twitter and footy forums. What's this game coming to?

I know. It's IMPOSSIBLE winning trophies playing positive football. IMPOSSIBLE. Never been done before, even after spending a billion dollars that has come at cost of lives of many innocent Russian men and women.

My man

by nadinkrah Tue Apr 22, 2014 10:17 pm

So what did people say when Atletico did this against barcelona?

"Not parking the bus, Simeone changed his tactical plans. blah blah"

by Arquitecto Tue Apr 22, 2014 10:18 pm

nadinkrah wrote:So what did people say when Atletico did this against barcelona?

"Not parking the bus, Simeone changed his tactical plans. blah blah"

Except they never played in such defensive fashion, Nadinkrap.

by nadinkrah Tue Apr 22, 2014 10:20 pm

watch the second leg please.

by BarrileteCosmico Tue Apr 22, 2014 10:20 pm

Arquitescu wrote:
sree999 wrote:It was embarrassment for 19 century football

Agreed. I cannot stand Mouthrinho and his gutter septic tank football played by Chav$ki.

Pls go poverty historians. 19th century football was ridiculously attacking, often playing with formations such as the 2-3-5. Even catenaccio would not be that shocking in this day and age.

by Lex Tue Apr 22, 2014 10:20 pm

What sad, sad poster re-registered as nadinkrah just to bash Atletico? Laughing

by nadinkrah Tue Apr 22, 2014 10:23 pm

When did I bash Atletico? From what I saw they parked the bus vs Barcelona in the 2nd leg. Yet no one complains and calls it excellent defending by atletico. lol...

by Arquitecto Tue Apr 22, 2014 10:24 pm

nadinkrah wrote:watch the second leg please.

Total attempts on goal 14
Shots on target 9
Off target: 7
Blocked: 4
Woodwork: 3
Passes: 318.

Goals scored: 1.

Stark difference, Nadinkrap.

by nadinkrah Tue Apr 22, 2014 10:29 pm

counter attack against a pathetic Barcelona defense. Did you actually watch the game? Atletico had the whole team behind the ball for 90 mins. You can't deny that fact

by gnrfan Tue Apr 22, 2014 10:30 pm

nadine...classic bulldyke name.

by harhar11 Tue Apr 22, 2014 10:30 pm

Lord Spencer wrote:Chelsea cost around 4 times what Altetico is worth.

Incidentally, Chelsea also fielded 4 DMs in their match against Atletico. Going into the Ubber defensive against one of the greatest sides in history (Prime Barca), or when you go a man down, is understandable.

However, going with 4 bloody DMs into a match with a team that is several rungs below you in the pecking order is just pathetic. Chelsea are a CL and EL champion ffs, they should muster enough balls to have more than 4 bloody shots on target.

This, this, a million time THIS!!

Everyone knows what I think about parking the bus, but I have also always said that I understand why they do it against US. But this is *bleep* Atleti, not prime Barça. I wouldn't be suprised if Chelsea's bench would cost more than the entire Atletico squad..

by Lex Tue Apr 22, 2014 10:31 pm

I seriously doubt Atletico executed 12 successful counter attacks vs Barcelona Laughing

Mate, face it, your argument is merdé

by che Tue Apr 22, 2014 10:31 pm

BarrileteCosmico wrote:
Pls go poverty historians. 19th century football was ridiculously attacking, often playing with formations such as the 2-3-5.

excellent football manager experiment on this topic, worth the read Laughing

https://imgur.com/a/DDjHP
https://imgur.com/a/kQ5ub
https://imgur.com/a/UCuP5
https://imgur.com/a/sLrwz
https://imgur.com/a/tqK2G

by Robespierre Tue Apr 22, 2014 10:32 pm

It' s strange Manchester United is thinking to Mourinho with Ian Holloway free on market hmm

by Shed Tue Apr 22, 2014 10:33 pm

Natalie Portman wrote:
Shed wrote:
boyzis wrote:i mean no offence to chelsea fans but i think even they would have not be happy with what they saw today.

Right you are. I was hoping to see us play open, restraint-less stuff and get thumped 4-0. Sure, we'd have been humiliated and effectively dumped out of the competition, but at least we'd have played moral football. Unbelievable that Mourinho would rather get a positive result than play to entertain neutrals on twitter and footy forums. What's this game coming to?

I know. It's IMPOSSIBLE winning trophies playing positive football. IMPOSSIBLE. Never been done before, even after spending a billion dollars that has come at cost of lives of many innocent Russian men and women.

It's possible to win trophies playing open football and it's possible to win trophies playing pragmatic football. What's given you or anyone else the authority to decide that one is morally superior to the other?

by Kick Tue Apr 22, 2014 10:58 pm

5 CL Semi's in 5 seasons yet he should retire :bow:

GL, Stay mad Proud

by harhar11 Tue Apr 22, 2014 11:21 pm

Lex wrote:I seriously doubt Atletico executed 12 successful counter attacks vs Barcelona

Mate, face it, your argument is merdé

You talking to me?

I never said that Atletico played offensive against us. Heck, in another thread I was saying that they play the same sh#it on a stick football that Mourinho's teams plays..

by Sponsored content