Mourinho is a God

Se7en wrote:

Arquitescu wrote:

Yes cause Hazard coming off for a more influential Schurrle was part of his plan.

Or was bringing on Demba Ba when a striker was exactly what they needed.

Or Blanc placing a spineless tactic for PSG absorbing more pressure than a Serie B side, causing Chelsea to dominate by default with all the space given.

Mourinho isn't behind this win, your players are.

just a prime example of someone who hasnt played football in real life

mourinho is a role model to his team, he gives them confidence, teaches them his defending philosophys etc

Mourinho isn't a tactical genius but he can step his game up in that area aswell, I didnt watch this game bcuz i was watching madrid-dortmund so I cant comment on his tactics, but I can already be assured that mourinho was the reason the players brought their A game with them today

Because thats always been his prime talent, how he handles his players, how he gets them motivated, changes their lifestyle to a healthier one. these things make a great coach, not just the tactical game. and this is why mou is a genius because he does this better than anyone does

Arquitescu wrote:

Se7en wrote:

Arquitescu wrote:

Yes cause Hazard coming off for a more influential Schurrle was part of his plan.

Or was bringing on Demba Ba when a striker was exactly what they needed.

Or Blanc placing a spineless tactic for PSG absorbing more pressure than a Serie B side, causing Chelsea to dominate by default with all the space given.

Mourinho isn't behind this win, your players are.

just a prime example of someone who hasnt played football in real life

mourinho is a role model to his team, he gives them confidence, teaches them his defending philosophys etc

Mourinho isn't a tactical genius but he can step his game up in that area aswell, I didnt watch this game bcuz i was watching madrid-dortmund so I cant comment on his tactics, but I can already be assured that mourinho was the reason the players brought their A game with them today

Because thats always been his prime talent, how he handles his players, how he gets them motivated, changes their lifestyle to a healthier one. these things make a great coach, not just the tactical game. and this is why mou is a genius because he does this better than anyone does

Don't tell me if I have played football or not. You just ended your weak argument by saying you didn't watch the game.

This Mourinho genius and 'does it better than anyone' makes you look even more than the Moubot you serve testament to.

Come back with an debate that is actually tangible to discuss.

Se7en wrote:

Arquitescu wrote:

Se7en wrote:

just a prime example of someone who hasnt played football in real life

mourinho is a role model to his team, he gives them confidence, teaches them his defending philosophys etc

Mourinho isn't a tactical genius but he can step his game up in that area aswell, I didnt watch this game bcuz i was watching madrid-dortmund so I cant comment on his tactics, but I can already be assured that mourinho was the reason the players brought their A game with them today

Because thats always been his prime talent, how he handles his players, how he gets them motivated, changes their lifestyle to a healthier one. these things make a great coach, not just the tactical game. and this is why mou is a genius because he does this better than anyone does

Don't tell me if I have played football or not. You just ended your weak argument by saying you didn't watch the game.

This Mourinho genius and 'does it better than anyone' makes you look even more than the Moubot you serve testament to.

Come back with an debate that is actually tangible to discuss.

its just basic knowledge... you cant just say "the players were behind the win", if all 11 players today played like fighters, you best believe the manager had something to do with it.

im not discussing the game, so me not seeing it is not really relevant to the discussion, i merely added it to explain why im not discussing the tactics for today. fact is, his players were mentally prepared today for a comeback and his tactics coudlnt be wrong because he just won 2-0. you dont need to watch the game to know that much

Arquitescu wrote:

Se7en wrote:

Arquitescu wrote:

Don't tell me if I have played football or not. You just ended your weak argument by saying you didn't watch the game.

This Mourinho genius and 'does it better than anyone' makes you look even more than the Moubot you serve testament to.

Come back with an debate that is actually tangible to discuss.

its just basic knowledge... you cant just say "the players were behind the win", if all 11 players today played like fighters, you best believe the manager had something to do with it.

im not discussing the game, so me not seeing it is not really relevant to the discussion, i merely added it to explain why im not discussing the tactics for today. fact is, his players were mentally prepared today for a comeback and his tactics coudlnt be wrong because he just won 2-0. you dont need to watch the game to know that much

As far as I'm concerned your post is mostly romantic theory to which again isn't tangible outcome.

The thread is saying Mourinho is a God in praise for this win, whereas numerous other factors were more responsible for the win compared to Mou's semantics.

Se7en wrote:

Arquitescu wrote:

Se7en wrote:

its just basic knowledge... you cant just say "the players were behind the win", if all 11 players today played like fighters, you best believe the manager had something to do with it.

im not discussing the game, so me not seeing it is not really relevant to the discussion, i merely added it to explain why im not discussing the tactics for today. fact is, his players were mentally prepared today for a comeback and his tactics coudlnt be wrong because he just won 2-0. you dont need to watch the game to know that much

As far as I'm concerned your post is mostly romantic theory to which again isn't tangible outcome.

The thread is saying Mourinho is a God in praise for this win, whereas numerous other factors were more responsible for the win compared to Mou's semantics.

yeah, go on, call it romantic... your idiotic opinions is what drives this forum to the shitters it is at today, obviously a manager that has won a league title in country he has been in, won 2 cl and numerous cups doesnt do shit, average manager with average tactics. obviously he doesnt motivate or mentally prepare his players, its just a coincidence that his team manages to make so many comebacks. everything is a coincidence

Arq, please play some football for a team, you obviously have no clue how the psychology of a player works. u need to read how mourinho prepares his team in general, the way he does it is different from many managers in the game and while its nothing revolutional the results themselves speaks that he does it better than anyone else

Arquitescu wrote:

Yes cause Hazard coming off for a more influential Schurrle was part of his plan.

Or was bringing on Demba Ba when a striker was exactly what they needed.

Or Blanc placing a spineless tactic for PSG absorbing more pressure than a Serie B side, causing Chelsea to dominate by default with all the space given.

Mourinho isn't behind this win, your players are.

Zealous wrote:Schurrle didn't start but Schurrle is a player Mou insisted on. He could have kept that scrub De Bryune like Gil wanted all summer. Hazard got injured obviously not part of the plan but the sub he chose put in a great performance.

Putting in Ba was the correct move, he needed another striker up front but given Ba's form doing something like that was a gamble, it paid off but I agree that this was a change he needed to make.

As for Blanc, he completely bottled it. Taking out Lucas was typical French surrender tactics. Total joke substitution

Anyway Mou prepared his team for this game very well. I think most of the good work was actually done before the game than during the game.

Arquitescu wrote:

Se7en wrote:

Arquitescu wrote:

As far as I'm concerned your post is mostly romantic theory to which again isn't tangible outcome.

The thread is saying Mourinho is a God in praise for this win, whereas numerous other factors were more responsible for the win compared to Mou's semantics.

yeah, go on, call it romantic... your idiotic opinions is what drives this forum to the shitters it is at today, obviously a manager that has won a league title in country he has been in, won 2 cl and numerous cups doesnt do shit, average manager with average tactics. obviously he doesnt motivate or mentally prepare his players, its just a coincidence that his team manages to make so many comebacks. everything is a coincidence

Arq, please play some football for a team, you obviously have no clue how the psychology of a player works. u need to read how mourinho prepares his team in general, the way he does it is different from many managers in the game and while its nothing revolutional the results themselves speaks that he does it better than anyone else

Take a lesson in reading comprehension first.

I am speaking about this tie and now Mourinho as a whole, to which serves little to no factor behind what happened tonight.

Since you did not watch the game, literally half of your debate is rendered ineffective considering....you did not watch it. The other half is rendered ineffective by the laughable notion that playing for a football team has me comprehend what a coach does for me (to which I have experienced) along with you putting nonsensical words in my mouth to which I did not conjure.

And no, football is not coincidental, calling it that would undermine the depth that produces what football is all about. Romanticism again.

fatman123 wrote:

Arquitescu wrote:

Yes cause Hazard coming off for a more influential Schurrle was part of his plan.

Or was bringing on Demba Ba when a striker was exactly what they needed.

Or Blanc placing a spineless tactic for PSG absorbing more pressure than a Serie B side, causing Chelsea to dominate by default with all the space given.

Mourinho isn't behind this win, your players are.

Arq, lets be honest, mou could solve world hunger and you wouldn't like him

Se7en wrote:

Arquitescu wrote:

Se7en wrote:

yeah, go on, call it romantic... your idiotic opinions is what drives this forum to the shitters it is at today, obviously a manager that has won a league title in country he has been in, won 2 cl and numerous cups doesnt do shit, average manager with average tactics. obviously he doesnt motivate or mentally prepare his players, its just a coincidence that his team manages to make so many comebacks. everything is a coincidence

Arq, please play some football for a team, you obviously have no clue how the psychology of a player works. u need to read how mourinho prepares his team in general, the way he does it is different from many managers in the game and while its nothing revolutional the results themselves speaks that he does it better than anyone else

Take a lesson in reading comprehension first.

I am speaking about this tie and now Mourinho as a whole, to which serves little to no factor behind what happened tonight.

Since you did not watch the game, literally half of your debate is rendered ineffective considering....you did not watch it. The other half is rendered ineffective by the laughable notion that playing for a football team has me comprehend what a coach does for me (to which I have experienced) along with you putting nonsensical words in my mouth to which I did not conjure.

And no, football is not coincidental, calling it that would undermine the depth that produces what football is all about. Romanticism again.

You ask me to take a lesson in reading comprehension and then take my satiric comments seriously? Obviously I don't believe what Mou does is a coincidence, I believe he influences every bit of a victory becuase thats what great coaches do and I believe Mou is a great coach

Obviously, u will stick to the point that I did not watch the game so I'll let the debate end here because I'm sure you are going to stick to that to run away from the discussion considirng my arguments were what Mou does in general so it shouldnt even matter if I watch the game

I'll still take a jab and call you clueless at understanding football, and I ask you to get off your computer and play a game of football for once of your life if you intend to ever discuss football with me again. A tips in future debates would be avoid them, because you shouldnt share football opinions without experiencing football. When you share football all you do is ruin this forum because this forum is already full of other ppl who just follow others here and like I said b4, dont use their own experiences with football to understand or debate about the game

-Using your own experiences unless you were actually playing relevant football is nonsensical considering the dynamics are quantam fold changed in those proportions.

Natalie Portman wrote:He never loses his QFs to be fair.

Semi finals though, he loses every single one of them .

The Semi-Special one

Gil wrote:

Gil wrote:

Se7en wrote:

-Using your own experiences unless you were actually playing relevant football is nonsensical considering the dynamics are quantam fold changed in those proportions.

dont understand that, pls use normal language, dumb it down if you have to

Kick wrote:

Natalie Portman wrote:He never loses his QFs to be fair.

Semi finals though, he loses every single one of them .

The Semi-Special one

Funny, I seem to recall him winning the CL a few times, did he do that while losing the Semi?