Chelsea Get Robbed Again

HOw do you not blow the fking wqistle after thh The throw-in was near enough exactly on the 96 minutes common sense indicts the right thing to do is blow the whistle... but instead this cnut randomly allows another minute Long enough for LiVerpool to score then blows the immeditely whistle after we kick off.

between this and the daylight robbery lkast week i don't know why i watch this bs anymore. fking seething here, i'll be furois if we end up losing CL spot because of this twat.


EDIT: Another f***king game where we get screwed over by refs. That's 3 in a damn row now. Don't think I've ever seen a club consistently get robbed like Chelsea have been these past few years.

We clearly need a strong manager at the helm. You rarely see these farcical decisions happen to the likes of Fergie, Pep, Capello, Mou, Wenger etc

maybe having a competent striker might help?

Yeh the game definitely should have ended when the clock hit 96 mins. Not sure why the referee didn't blow his whistle.

We did, he was on the bench.

Brilliant by FSW there

Do people even know the rules in regards to injury time?

Their goal was legit, the only thing that wasn't was the fact Suarez was on the pitch. We time wasted and got punished for it.

Im just 2 log off before i end up doing somethn i rgret.

lol. chelsea were a bunch of jokers on the pitch. glad pool got smth.

Kick wrote:Their goal was legit, the only thing that wasn't was the fact Suarez was on the pitch. We time wasted and got punished for it.

HGOIWSoi THE FK WAS THAT LEGIT?!?!?

HE ADDED ON 6 MIUNTESA FOR NO REAON AND THEN BLEW WHEN WE HAD POSSSESSIION!!


WTFSAF!!?!? FROI

The whistle should have blown as soon as the ball reached the centre of the pitch from that throw in. The fact the ref allowed play to continue well into the 96th minute, starting from LFc's defence, all the way to their attack, was unfair.

We were time wasting so the reff added more time on. He felt that was fair. I agree it should have been blown sooner but we can't blame the reff for not blowing the whiste, we should have defended better.

A draw is still a good result, we're in 4th by a point with a game in hand over Arsenal, now we just gotta beat Spurs and we're fine.

SHOULD NEVER HAVE ADDED 6 WHOLE F*KIN MINUTES IN THE FIRST PLACE! I'M JUST GOING TO LOG OFF NOW.

Tbh the ref should have blown long before that goal was scored....

It happened 30 seconds after the time given.

6 minutes was the minimum time that was added on. Means more can be by the ref where he sees fit. He did and the scored. Why is the only person saying the ref wasn't wrong here a Chelsea fan?

Kick: voice of reason

While Chelsea are obviously are rivals, can't help but feel a bit sorry for them.

Race for the Champions League spots' just getting more interesting by each passing the week.

I love knee-jerk threads.

Please don't argue. The name of the thread is "F*** Football" FFS... My argument has been made for me.

Kick wrote:6 minutes was the minimum time that was added on. Means more can be by the ref where he sees fit. He did and the scored. Why is the only person saying the ref wasn't wrong here a Chelsea fan?

You're not getting me here, mate. WHY WAS 6 WHOLE MINUTES ADDED IN THE FIRST PLACE?! And then he had the guts to even go 30 secs extra. I don't know what you're arguing but that is f*kin bulls***

Meh, we'll beat spurs and finish 3rd. Just have to make sure we beat United too.

Boo f*cking hoo, blame the ref if anyone, they add time as they see fit. And It's not like Chelsea played well to deserve the win. Everyone gets unfair shit happened to them. The thing they should be complaining about was Suarez still being on the pitch at that time.

The icing on the cake will be if an official saw it.

It was Justice for the 96.

Blue Barrett wrote:WHY WAS 6 WHOLE MINUTES ADDED IN THE FIRST PLACE?!

Wasn't Oscar knocked down for, like 4 minutes? The stretcher even came on, but brave Oscar managed to crawl off the pitch under his own power, bah gawd

Blue Barrett wrote:

Kick wrote:6 minutes was the minimum time that was added on. Means more can be by the ref where he sees fit. He did and the scored. Why is the only person saying the ref wasn't wrong here a Chelsea fan?

You're not getting me here, mate. WHY WAS 6 WHOLE MINUTES ADDED IN THE FIRST PLACE?! And then he had the guts to even go 30 secs extra. I don't know what you're arguing but that is f*kin bulls***

Because of all the injuries and are you saying that 30 seconds couldn't possibly be added to the 6 minutes during injury time? If you add on all the time wasting we did, I am sure it counts to be more than that so in fairness to liverpool it was added on.

Also, chill, a draw isn't the end of the world. We just have to step up.

Lex wrote:

Blue Barrett wrote:WHY WAS 6 WHOLE MINUTES ADDED IN THE FIRST PLACE?!

Wasn't Oscar knocked down for, like 4 minutes? The stretcher even came on, but brave Oscar managed to crawl off the pitch under his own power, bah gawd

The penalty took 2 minutes to be taken. There was 5 subs as well or something like that. 6 minutes was fair.

AltoZ wrote:It was Justice for the 96.

Your post was deleted for a reason. This is no place to joke about that incident. Stop trolling and post something relevant for once.