Fifa Coach of the Season?

deadrave wrote:mourinho or RDM

no one else deserves it, klopp didnt exist in CL, conte didnt exist in CL either "literally"

On the other hand, Kloppo works on a very tight budget and he reached his successes (BL double with the highest ever number of points in history) with a bunch of kids and not a collection of expensive stars. That to me shows his outstanding quality as coach and why he would deserve to win.

deadrave wrote:mourinho or RDM

no one else deserves it, klopp didnt exist in CL, conte didnt exist in CL either "literally"

i want mou, but if RDM takes it ill still be happy!

So if a coach wasn't in the CL he shouldn't be considered? No, just no.

Conte took a team that finished 7th 2 years in a row and won them the league, unbeaten. Not to mention getting to the Coppa Italia final.

deadrave wrote:mourinho or RDM

no one else deserves it, klopp didnt exist in CL, conte didnt exist in CL either "literally"

i want mou, but if RDM takes it ill still be happy!

but klopp was in the cl

RDM

Nah, Conte probably. He did an amazing thing this year.

"Messi or Cristiano Ronaldo? I prefer Messi, because he's more of a street player," Del Bosque said to Punto Pelota.

When asked whether he wanted to predict who would win the Fifa Ballon d'Or, the former Real Madrid boss stated that he did not see the award as a matter of importance.

"I do not like the Ballon d'Or. It's a marketing tool. Our boys are good players and nice people.

"If they gave [the award for best coach] to me, I would accept it, though, because I don't want to upset Fifa."

Mourinho led Real Madrid to the best league win in professional history.

Unbeaten has been done before and Italy is in shambles.

100 points, 120 odd goals and beating one of the best teams in the history of football for the league title is a far greater accomplishment. Not to mention he also got to the SF's in the UCL as well.

I would say RDM/Conte/VDB for 2-3 but Jose Mourinho deserves number 1 spot.

Last years Barcelona is nowhere near the "best team in history of football".

Any of Del Bosque, Conte and Klopp would be fair imo.

Crimson wrote:Mourinho led Real Madrid to the best league win in professional history.

Unbeaten has been done before and Italy is in shambles.

100 points, 120 odd goals and beating one of the best teams in the history of football for the league title is a far greater accomplishment. Not to mention he also got to the SF's in the UCL as well.

I would say RDM/Conte/VDB for 2-3 but Jose Mourinho deserves number 1 spot.

£450,000,000 million on squad. Cityhavent won a league in 50 years. Chelsea won their first Cl in history. Klopp and Conte deserve it more than Mou.

champions league is the highest level you will get

domestically some1 will always win it, we cant count it down to external factors
dortmund is a team full of talents, winning the league while finishing last in the CL group stages
this says to me other than they failed big time in europe, it says also they werent as tired as their main rival bayern which had a game each midweek unlike them

german cup? haha ok... RDM won fa cup you know, so what?


del bosque? of course.. when you have 500 or so top class talents you can choose for your NT team you r supposed to win arent you?

barca might not have been the best team in history of football last year
but serie a is particularly weak as well now considering how it was before
conte did it with juve. not with parma nor lazio. would be fascinating if he did it with this inter even..


for me you need to do something in the highest level in this case CL
and RDM did it with a chelsea team almost "dead" mentally
he revived it eliminating barca and winning the hosts in the final
as well as winning the FA cup if domestic cups mean so much to you

while mou won the domestic league against barca which is the best side in the world unless madrid is.. you choose i dnt care
he also did good in CL
he did not reach the semis... would be fair to say he could have been in the final cause he never lost the last decisive qualifing match against bayern since it came down to penalties

deadrave wrote:champions league is the highest level you will get

domestically some1 will always win it, we cant count it down to external factors
dortmund is a team full of talents, winning the league while finishing last in the CL group stages
this says to me other than they failed big time in europe, it says also they werent as tired as their main rival bayern which had a game each midweek unlike them

german cup? haha ok... RDM won fa cup you know, so what?


del bosque? of course.. when you have 500 or so top class talents you can choose for your NT team you r supposed to win arent you?

barca might not have been the best team in history of football last year
but serie a is particularly weak as well now considering how it was before
conte did it with juve. not with parma nor lazio. would be fascinating if he did it with this inter even..


for me you need to do something in the highest level in this case CL
and RDM did it with a chelsea team almost "dead" mentally
he revived it eliminating barca and winning the hosts in the final
as well as winning the FA cup if domestic cups mean so much to you

while mou won the domestic league against barca which is the best side in the world unless madrid is.. you choose i dnt care
he also did good in CL
he did not reach the semis... would be fair to say he could have been in the final cause he never lost the last decisive qualifing match against bayern since it came down to penalties

Are Barcelona cl champins? Are chelsea cl champions? How are they the best in the world? get over yourself. Bayern was getting hamstrung by Dortmund and they outplayed madrid over 2 legs.

Juve finished 7th twice and Conte made them unbeaten ffs.

atm barca is the best in the world wether you like it or not

wether bayern outplayed madrid its another story which has many factors with the more important one the way mou approached the game
in which way didnt fail
get over your self bayern never eliminated madrid
penalties are penalties and even my local team can qualify through them

juve finished 7th? what about madrid failing to qualify from the quarters for so many years and getting humiliated by barca as well
it comes down to luck that any of this stopped and people start doupting barca's superiority to madrid?

as i said before serie a is dead. other than the fact that you dont have a barca class opponent to compete they also didnt have any european games to distract and exhaust them



what conte did was great, but it issnt something to be called the best coach of the year

deadrave wrote:champions league is the highest level you will get

domestically some1 will always win it, we cant count it down to external factors
dortmund is a team full of talents, winning the league while finishing last in the CL group stages
this says to me other than they failed big time in europe, it says also they werent as tired as their main rival bayern which had a game each midweek unlike them

german cup? haha ok... RDM won fa cup you know, so what?


del bosque? of course.. when you have 500 or so top class talents you can choose for your NT team you r supposed to win arent you?

barca might not have been the best team in history of football last year
but serie a is particularly weak as well now considering how it was before
conte did it with juve. not with parma nor lazio. would be fascinating if he did it with this inter even..


for me you need to do something in the highest level in this case CL
and RDM did it with a chelsea team almost "dead" mentally
he revived it eliminating barca and winning the hosts in the final
as well as winning the FA cup if domestic cups mean so much to you

while mou won the domestic league against barca which is the best side in the world unless madrid is.. you choose i dnt care
he also did good in CL
he did not reach the semis... would be fair to say he could have been in the final cause he never lost the last decisive qualifing match against bayern since it came down to penalties

I just want to point out that when Conte took over, Juve was at Catania's level, maybe even worse. Lazio were a better team than us before Conte took over.

deadrave wrote:atm barca is the best in the world wether you like it or not

wether bayern outplayed madrid its another story which has many factors with the more important one the way mou approached the game
in which way didnt fail
get over your self bayern never eliminated madrid
penalties are penalties and even my local team can qualify through them

juve finished 7th? what about madrid failing to qualify from the quarters for so many years and getting humiliated by barca as well
it comes down to luck that any of this stopped and people start doupting barca's superiority to madrid?

as i said before serie a is dead. other than the fact that you dont have a barca class opponent to compete they also didnt have any european games to distract and exhaust them



what conte did was great, but it issnt something to be called the best coach of the year

woow, stop underrating Serie A lol (It's not far off from the PL or La Liga), and stop using it's quality as an excuse to undermine Conte's achievements.

deadrave wrote:atm barca is the best in the world wether you like it or not

wether bayern outplayed madrid its another story which has many factors with the more important one the way mou approached the game
in which way didnt fail
get over your self bayern never eliminated madrid
penalties are penalties and even my local team can qualify through them

juve finished 7th? what about madrid failing to qualify from the quarters for so many years and getting humiliated by barca as well
it comes down to luck that any of this stopped and people start doupting barca's superiority to madrid?

as i said before serie a is dead. other than the fact that you dont have a barca class opponent to compete they also didnt have any european games to distract and exhaust them



what conte did was great, but it issnt something to be called the best coach of the year

Where is the cl? Where is the league title? Titles dictate who is the best. There is no room for subjectivity here, Barcelona are not the best, deal with it. Cl Madrid still flopped against the only 2nd decent team theyve faced since Mou took over. Bayern and BArcelona, and youve lost them both! Mou will never win coach of the year for only delivering la liga. Klopp deserves it more and so does Conte. Almost half a billion spent on thayt squad. What about mancini?

John Terry.

ok dude chelsea is better than barcelona

we saw that in their two encounters..

the logic in here is



im really wondering if luck plays a role in the dertemination of the outcome for you guys.. really does it?

we saw how the encounter of bayern and madrid ended and yet you say madrid flopped
kudos to bayern then for eliminating madrid in the penalties... we know, or at least i know they couldnt and they didnt eliminate them in normal or extra time as well as madrid couldnt do so

i can take it for mou not to win it. and winning only la liga is not enough i agree
but in anyway i wouldnt give it to either klopp or conte

RDM deserves more than them by FAR!

John van 't Schip

Updated list. I find the arguments pleasing... RDM would be a risk imo as he has only done half a season with Chelsea not a full (though next few games in the new season, may change things) therefore my vote doesn't go to him.