Italian Clubs under investigation for match fixing

Leonardo Bonucci charged and facing 3 year ban from football...

Spoiler:

As long as Conte is okay thats all that matters.

Both Conte and Pepe are cleared of sporting fraud but risk a ban for failing to report it..

Whereas Bonucci risks a three year ban after being accused of match fixing..

Vibe wrote:Leonardo Bonucci charged and facing 3 year ban from football...

Spoiler:

Uhmm its not like its official yet..So you could use better vocabulary there..

Dont try to pull off some cheap stunt cuz its not funny anyway..

Matchfixing while he was at Juventus or before?

Le Samourai wrote:Matchfixing while he was at Juventus or before?

While he was at Bari in 2010.

Bari-Udinese game being investigated..(result was a 3-3 draw)

Surag wrote:

Vibe wrote:Leonardo Bonucci charged and facing 3 year ban from football...

Spoiler:

Uhmm its not like its official yet..So you could use better vocabulary there..

Dont try to pull off some cheap stunt cuz its not funny anyway..

How about you take some English lessons and quit stalking me...

He's right though. Bonucci isn't charged yet, he's just been accused.

Conte and Pepe looking at either 3 or 6 months depending on where you read it seems

Vibe wrote:

Surag wrote:

Vibe wrote:Leonardo Bonucci charged and facing 3 year ban from football...

Spoiler:

Uhmm its not like its official yet..So you could use better vocabulary there..

Dont try to pull off some cheap stunt cuz its not funny anyway..

How about you take some English lessons and quit stalking me...

7amood11 wrote:He's right though. Bonucci isn't charged yet, he's just been accused.

LOL how embarassing for vibe, if that is the case .

TIMMEHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH

What match Bonucci accused of fixing?

Kick wrote:What match Bonucci accused of fixing?

Bari 3-3 Udinese

The same match.

Vibe wrote:

Surag wrote:

Vibe wrote:Leonardo Bonucci charged and facing 3 year ban from football...

Spoiler:

Uhmm its not like its official yet..So you could use better vocabulary there..

Dont try to pull off some cheap stunt cuz its not funny anyway..

How about you take some English lessons and quit stalking me...

You're on 25%..Quit playing these cheap tricks just to win some rep points from lame uninformed fans.

7amood11 wrote:He's right though. Bonucci isn't charged yet, he's just been accused.

http://www.thefreedictionary.com/accuse

1. To charge with a shortcoming or error.
2. To charge formally with a wrongdoing.
3. To make a charge of wrongdoing against another.

Surag wrote:

Vibe wrote:

Surag wrote:

Vibe wrote:Leonardo Bonucci charged and facing 3 year ban from football...

Spoiler:

Uhmm its not like its official yet..So you could use better vocabulary there..

Dont try to pull off some cheap stunt cuz its not funny anyway..

How about you take some English lessons and quit stalking me...

You're on 25%..Quit playing these cheap tricks just to win some rep points from lame uninformed fans.

The rumour that you only need to collect 25 points positive reputation to get 25% warning level back is not true

BTW, I am watching you all. So stay civil, please. ^^

Surag wrote:

Vibe wrote:

Surag wrote:

Vibe wrote:Leonardo Bonucci charged and facing 3 year ban from football...

Spoiler:

Uhmm its not like its official yet..So you could use better vocabulary there..

Dont try to pull off some cheap stunt cuz its not funny anyway..

How about you take some English lessons and quit stalking me...

You're on 25%..Quit playing these cheap tricks just to win some rep points from lame uninformed fans.

Dude,you're seriously out of line.All you do is follow me and make your own fictional conclusion about what I'm doing and post them here where no one pays attention to it.Vibe is this,Vibe is that,he's doing this,he's doing that.Not to mention you always add a little diminutive adjective,like cheap,idiotic, etc...You're obsessing.

Whatever your problem is with me,give it a rest.

Vibe wrote:

7amood11 wrote:He's right though. Bonucci isn't charged yet, he's just been accused.

http://www.thefreedictionary.com/accuse

1. To charge with a shortcoming or error.
2. To charge formally with a wrongdoing.
3. To make a charge of wrongdoing against another.

maybe its an American thing, I can accuse someone at the office for being racist or what not. But I cant charge them, I can accuse you of being a bellend and a tool but I cant charge you.

John Terry was accused of racial abuse and if he would have been found guilty he would have been charged. If the Italian FA or who ever decides that Bonnucci is guilty then they will CHARGE him as an official CHARGE, not an official accusation .

Abramovich wrote:

Vibe wrote:

7amood11 wrote:He's right though. Bonucci isn't charged yet, he's just been accused.

http://www.thefreedictionary.com/accuse

1. To charge with a shortcoming or error.
2. To charge formally with a wrongdoing.
3. To make a charge of wrongdoing against another.

John Terry was accused of racial abuse and if he would have been found guilty he would have been charged. If the Italian FA or who ever decides that Bonnucci is guilty then they will CHARGE him as an official CHARGE, not an official accusation .

For real? This is court,there is no unofficial accusation.When you accuse,you charge.Charging isn't the punishment,it's the start of the process.FFS...

First you are found guilty,then charged? Dat logic...

I'm just telling you dont try to be a smartass here..Nothing is official..Atm this is just a deferral(this is what some reports say)..'Deferral' and 'Charge' are two separate things anyway.Lets wait until August 2 for more updates which is when the hearings are set to start.

And whatever you posted just now is complete nonsense..lol..I dont know what you are even talking about.

Whatever your problem is with me,give it a rest.

Lol i'm not obssessed with you..Drop that trolling intention of yours.Its for your own good.

Abramovich wrote:

Vibe wrote:

7amood11 wrote:He's right though. Bonucci isn't charged yet, he's just been accused.

http://www.thefreedictionary.com/accuse

1. To charge with a shortcoming or error.
2. To charge formally with a wrongdoing.
3. To make a charge of wrongdoing against another.

maybe its an American thing, I can accuse someone at the office for being racist or what not. But I cant charge them, I can accuse you of being a bellend and a tool but I cant charge you.

John Terry was accused of racial abuse and if he would have been found guilty he would have been charged. If the Italian FA or who ever decides that Bonnucci is guilty then they will CHARGE him as an official CHARGE, not an official accusation .

How can you be found guilty before you are charged...

Vibe wrote:

Abramovich wrote:

Vibe wrote:

7amood11 wrote:He's right though. Bonucci isn't charged yet, he's just been accused.

http://www.thefreedictionary.com/accuse

1. To charge with a shortcoming or error.
2. To charge formally with a wrongdoing.
3. To make a charge of wrongdoing against another.

John Terry was accused of racial abuse and if he would have been found guilty he would have been charged. If the Italian FA or who ever decides that Bonnucci is guilty then they will CHARGE him as an official CHARGE, not an official accusation .

For real? This is court,there is no unofficial accusation.When you accuse,you charge.Charging isn't the punishment,it's the start of the process.FFS...

So in the court they dont used the term "the accused" but "the charged", a charge is official where as an accusation is unoffical. If it isnt official he hasnt been charged, sure you get charged at the start of the process if it is official.

Ok may I word it wrong somewhat but if its official and they are guilty then they are charged and found guilty no? If its not offical then its just an accusation?? Example being Ivanovic punches that Wigan guy, gets accused initally by fans and what not then gets charged by FA.

Abramovich wrote:

Vibe wrote:

Abramovich wrote:

Vibe wrote:

7amood11 wrote:He's right though. Bonucci isn't charged yet, he's just been accused.

http://www.thefreedictionary.com/accuse

1. To charge with a shortcoming or error.
2. To charge formally with a wrongdoing.
3. To make a charge of wrongdoing against another.

John Terry was accused of racial abuse and if he would have been found guilty he would have been charged. If the Italian FA or who ever decides that Bonnucci is guilty then they will CHARGE him as an official CHARGE, not an official accusation .

For real? This is court,there is no unofficial accusation.When you accuse,you charge.Charging isn't the punishment,it's the start of the process.FFS...

So in the court they dont used the term "the accused" but "the charged", a charge is official where as an accusation is unoffical. If it isnt official he hasnt been charged, sure you get charged at the start of the process if it is official.

Ok may I word it wrong somewhat but if its official and they are guilty then they are charged and found guilty no? If its not offical then its just an accusation?? Example being Ivanovic punches that Wigan guy, gets accused initally by fans and what not then gets charged by FA.

Italian FA (FIGC) has announced that the centre-back will face charges of sporting fraud.

People, people... Please quite that fight about semantics. Law stuff is weird in any case, but let's put is that so far there is only an accusation, but no verdict yet, yes?

Then he is charged, my JT example may have been shitty. The point was accusation and charge not same thing .