Schalke's attack vs Napoli's

Both teams that are fragile in the back and rely mostly on their attacking prowess of 3 players. Who do you rate higher and why?

I rate Napoli's attack higher. As individuals and collectively, Napoli's trio is better than Schalkes.

Schalkes attack is better, but their structure is worse, if that makes any sense. Also they get less service. Holtby is in a bit of a slump, I rate Draxler highly, but the rest of midfield are hit and miss, imho, all lacking consistency big time, as seen time and time again.

Plus their defence without Höwedes...

So on most days Napoli will perform better, I just think Schalke could do better than Napoli if they had better chemistry. So next season, maybe. Farfan just fails to show up too often, and Draxler is just too young to do it all, when Holtby is out or still trying to get back into step.

So yeah. Napoli, probably, and sadly.

Napoli attack players are all world class supported by world class mids Inler and Gargano. Dzemaili is sub and would start elsewhere for a big club.

Inler and Gargano are not World class lol

Gargano ......can you name 5 better than him

Mr Nick09 wrote:Inler and Gargano are not World class lol

You are in the minority thinking this way. Gargano is certainly world class, and so is Inler. Dzemaili is world class and he is sub for Inler. LOL