Arsene Wenger wanted by Real Madrid [Exclusive]

kiranr wrote:

halamadrid2 wrote:there is no quotes which is why he has no reason to sue them

they say people "close" to him told us.... and they are allowed to do that

tabloid stay within the boundaries but they find loopholes in the law so that they can print whatever they want without being sued.... they are usually very careful with that because its alot of money they would be sued with if they tell a lie while saying they've used facts

Admittedly, i do not know the law regarding this. But, even if they dont use any quotes, if asked to name the source, they should be able to produce the source. Atleast, i think they would have to.

kiranr wrote:

rwo power wrote:In that case you could ask the judge to be changed for lack of objectivity.

An objective judge would still rule in my favour if Farca is a well known means of making fun of FCB!

rwo power wrote:

babun1024 wrote:Kinrar a bandwagoner?

He is rumored to support 3 different clubs: Farca, Real Madrid and Arsenal. An undisclosed source close to him meantions that he (Kinrar) would jump on the bandwagon of any attacking team actually and those three clubs appeal to him the most

Ever considered getting a writers job at the BLÖD?

kiranr wrote:Who is your source Babun?

I would sue you for writing Farca alone!

halamadrid2 wrote:
they cant lol

why do you think Daily fail and the sun write a lot of bullcrap(showbiz), because nobody can sue them as they are still within the boundaries....

however if all of a sudden they say Mou impregnated this surrogate mother then he has valid enough reason to take the issue to court(if its a lie)

things like "herp derp Mou wants to go back to England" "Mou doesnt like Madrid" "Ramos and Mou dont like each other" is just the papers way of selling newspapers by making them appealing to buyers

babun1024 wrote:Von Zeit zur Zeit bin ich dem Ausprobieren verschiedener Schreibstille nicht abgeneignt, Mäuschen, der Abwechslung wegen. Auf keinen Fall will ich aber mit dem Schwachmaten-Verein Blöd-Zeitung assoziert werden

babun1024 wrote:
What do you want to sue me for?
I didn't accuse you of anything

kiranr wrote:I have no idea about this and i am just guessing. I hope if i take offence at a published article about me and it causes me some damage, i can sue the paper who published it.

rwo power wrote:

babun1024 wrote:Von Zeit zur Zeit bin ich dem Ausprobieren verschiedener Schreibstille nicht abgeneignt, Mäuschen, der Abwechslung wegen. Auf keinen Fall will ich aber mit dem Schwachmaten-Verein Blöd-Zeitung assoziert werden

LOL, I see. BTW, the BLÖD-writers are actually not "Schwachmaten" at all - they know exactly how they need to write to manipulate the masses and just stay away from getting into legal cases that they could lose. ^^

rwo power wrote:

kiranr wrote:I have no idea about this and i am just guessing. I hope if i take offence at a published article about me and it causes me some damage, i can sue the paper who published it.

I think nowadays people that get slandered in newspapers are usually intelligent enough not to go directly at the article. Ever heard of the "Streisand effect"?

This: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Streisand_effect

kiranr wrote:

rwo power wrote:

kiranr wrote:I have no idea about this and i am just guessing. I hope if i take offence at a published article about me and it causes me some damage, i can sue the paper who published it.

I think nowadays people that get slandered in newspapers are usually intelligent enough not to go directly at the article. Ever heard of the "Streisand effect"?

This: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Streisand_effect

Yeah, i get what you are saying.

rwo power wrote:
Nowadays deflection is possibly the better way to gloss over unfavourable stuff. Just publish something that sounds more interesting about you and the other news will soon be forgotten.

(And of course there are always people who say "bad news is better than no news" XD)

rwo power wrote:

kiranr wrote:

rwo power wrote:

kiranr wrote:I have no idea about this and i am just guessing. I hope if i take offence at a published article about me and it causes me some damage, i can sue the paper who published it.

I think nowadays people that get slandered in newspapers are usually intelligent enough not to go directly at the article. Ever heard of the "Streisand effect"?

This: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Streisand_effect

Yeah, i get what you are saying.

Nowadays deflection is possibly the better way to gloss over unfavourable stuff. Just publish something that sounds more interesting about you and the other news will soon be forgotten.

(But of course there are always people who say "bad news is better than no news" XD)

"We have five points more than the team that everyone thinks is the best in the world," exclaimed Mourinho. "It is because we are not doing as badly and have as many problems as people think we have.

"When I came here the club had a tradition of being eliminated from the Copa del Rey by teams from the lower divisions.

"When I arrived, we were not seeded in the Champions League and now we have the record for most wins in the group stage. I seem to have so many problems.

"This game does not mark a before and after in my career," concluded Mourinho.

kiranr wrote:I guess there are always some cases where no amount of deflection will make the original article unforgettable.

rwo power wrote:

kiranr wrote:I guess there are always some cases where no amount of deflection will make the original article unforgettable.

Unless you manage to counter with an article that embarrasses and thus ridicules the original one. That way you can possibly even undermine the believability of the original writer

Oh, and what babun wrote (he was faster )

kiranr wrote:Press wars!

halamadrid2 wrote:

kiranr wrote:

rwo power wrote:In that case you could ask the judge to be changed for lack of objectivity.

An objective judge would still rule in my favour if Farca is a well known means of making fun of FCB!

Farca is very common in madrid, it means mate

kiranr wrote:

babun1024 wrote:Another BS rumor
Last 25 games: 23 wins 0 draws and 2 losses against Farca.

Some background info, Marca is furious because Mou snubs them Expect them to print a lot more BS to destabilize him Oh yeah, if we win a league title at the end of the season, Marca will claim that they helped us a lot :lol!:

It can't be that simple. There are courts in Spain you know. If they are printing total BS, Mou will sue the crap out of them.

VivaStPauli wrote:I meant to type a short piece on how Wengers youth development didn't pan out in English, and accidentally wrote in German about German tabloids - THE KEYS ARE LIKE RIGHT NEXT TO EACH OTHER.

VivaStPauli wrote:I meant to type a short piece on how Wengers youth development didn't pan out in English, and accidentally wrote in German about German tabloids - THE KEYS ARE LIKE RIGHT NEXT TO EACH OTHER.