Give your favorite Milan line up for next year

king_alex10 wrote:una bella cassanata is in order if you ask me.

Giancarlo laughed at me for putting Cassano in a preferred Milan XI, but lets face it, when he is on his game he is a MONSTER

He is a monster!!!!! But I agree, I see a cassanata happening around January

king_alex10 wrote:una bella cassanata is in order if you ask me.

Giancarlo laughed at me for putting Cassano in a preferred Milan XI, but lets face it, when he is on his game he is a MONSTER

What?

All I said is that he isn't an attacking midfielder, and that he is a second striker. Where did I laugh at you?

Giancarlo wrote:

king_alex10 wrote:una bella cassanata is in order if you ask me.

Giancarlo laughed at me for putting Cassano in a preferred Milan XI, but lets face it, when he is on his game he is a MONSTER

What?

All I said is that he isn't an attacking midfielder, and that he is a second striker. Where did I laugh at you?

I completely disagree... He's a support striker and can be used as a Trequartisa(AM)

sciacca wrote:

I completely disagree... He's a support striker and can be used as a Trequartisa(AM)

What did I say? I said he's a second striker.

And no... he needs to lose weight and get into shape before he can be a trequartista. In fact, I think Robinho would play better there.

He hasn't played that position in ages.

Giancarlo wrote:

sciacca wrote:

I completely disagree... He's a support striker and can be used as a Trequartisa(AM)

What did I say? I said he's a second striker.

And no... he needs to lose weight and get into shape before he can be a trequartista. In fact, I think Robinho would play better there.

He hasn't played that position in ages.

Yes but its not the fact he has to regain fitness to play in that role, I know that, and I've said that many times in the past and in the Azzurri thread. My point is, as a player, with his attributes and skills, he can forfill that position

Robinho > Cassano at AM. :study:

sciacca wrote:

Giancarlo wrote:

sciacca wrote:

I completely disagree... He's a support striker and can be used as a Trequartisa(AM)

What did I say? I said he's a second striker.

And no... he needs to lose weight and get into shape before he can be a trequartista. In fact, I think Robinho would play better there.

He hasn't played that position in ages.

Yes but its not the fact he has to regain fitness to play in that role, I know that, and I've said that many times in the past and in the Azzurri thread. My point is, as a player, with his attributes and skills, he can forfill that position

Okay...

But Robinho still is better in that position and faster. And Robinho is extremely skilled too... I would play ...

Robinho
Ibra, Cassano

I don't hate Cassano. I like the guy. I was happy he joined us... but he really needs to get into fitness. We need a faster AMF who can play well the entire game. Not just 30 minutes.

The problem is, Pato is better over Cassano in that position... Tobad for Cassano I guess

sciacca wrote:The problem is, Pato is better over Cassano in that position... Tobad for Cassano I guess

I don't know about that.

It's called squad rotation. Sometimes Pato can have horrible games, and Cassano can be better then him. I've seen it several times in the prior season. Squad rotation is the best thing. At one point we were way too thin in the attacking department. I never want to go back to those days.

I think we can have a good rotation system (and we did implement one) where all the players can be happy.

Cassano, by the way, actually did very well getting six assists and 4 goals (though two were PKs)...

----------Abbiati
Abate - Nesta - Silva - Taiwo
Prince- Ambro - Montolivo
-----------Ganso
------ Pato - Ibra

Giancarlo wrote:

sciacca wrote:The problem is, Pato is better over Cassano in that position... Tobad for Cassano I guess

I don't know about that.

It's called squad rotation. Sometimes Pato can have horrible games, and Cassano can be better then him. I've seen it several times in the prior season. Squad rotation is the best thing. At one point we were way too thin in the attacking department. I never want to go back to those days.

I think we can have a good rotation system (and we did implement one) where all the players can be happy.

Cassano, by the way, actually did very well getting six assists and 4 goals (though two were PKs)...

Yes and there is a reason why I made a video on that. But as Brigate said in the past, 'This isn't Milan without Pato.' Me in my honest opinion, I'd play Cassano and yes I do think he's better, however I claimed Pato was better in a sense to what he brings to Milan fans. As for Azzurri fans like me, I want him starting each time.

i think cassano was ok but i wasn't exactly blown away by his performance with us!, 6 or so months and he is still unfit??, he sucked more than he delivered, i think he was signed by galliani for the sake of giving our sequad more depth, he was never signed to be starter, he was brought to be a backup. comparing him with pato was very funny though......

Giancarlo wrote:

king_alex10 wrote:una bella cassanata is in order if you ask me.

Giancarlo laughed at me for putting Cassano in a preferred Milan XI, but lets face it, when he is on his game he is a MONSTER

What?

All I said is that he isn't an attacking midfielder, and that he is a second striker. Where did I laugh at you?

jeesus... u take everything so literal or serious... i meant that u laughed at me in that u totally disagreed with me..

Fadi wrote:i think cassano was ok but i wasn't exactly blown away by his performance with us!, 6 or so months and he is still unfit??, he sucked more than he delivered, i think he was signed by galliani for the sake of giving our sequad more depth, he was never signed to be starter, he was brought to be a backup. comparing him with pato was very funny though......

IMO I also thought that he was signed to keep him away from Inter or other title contenders

king_alex10 wrote:

Fadi wrote:i think cassano was ok but i wasn't exactly blown away by his performance with us!, 6 or so months and he is still unfit??, he sucked more than he delivered, i think he was signed by galliani for the sake of giving our sequad more depth, he was never signed to be starter, he was brought to be a backup. comparing him with pato was very funny though......

IMO I also thought that he was signed to keep him away from Inter or other title contenders

Agreed.

Off topic: King get on Skype

non posso

sciacca wrote:

Yes and there is a reason why I made a video on that. But as Brigate said in the past, 'This isn't Milan without Pato.' Me in my honest opinion, I'd play Cassano and yes I do think he's better, however I claimed Pato was better in a sense to what he brings to Milan fans. As for Azzurri fans like me, I want him starting each time.

The problem with Pato is he is very inconsistent. One day he'll bag a brace against Inter, the next game he'll be invisible. I know that Cassano has a great set of skills. But as I said, rotation is the key to our success.

Fadi wrote:i think cassano was ok but i wasn't exactly blown away by his performance with us!, 6 or so months and he is still unfit??, he sucked more than he delivered, i think he was signed by galliani for the sake of giving our sequad more depth, he was never signed to be starter, he was brought to be a backup. comparing him with pato was very funny though......

Sorry but I just don't see that. Even if he was unfit, he contributed a great... some very important assists too... there were more pros then cons regarding his transfer.

hes was ok,nothing good or bad

CroInter wrote:
Inter got 3 against, Milan? 0. (Only team in Italy with 0 penalties agaisnt, Lo stile ref help )

Milan vs Bologna
Milan vs Udinese

Rumor has it that with the signing of the 18 year old from serie B Milan will have 7 forward so one between paloschi or cassano will have to leave.
Which one do you guys thing should go?

We sell Cassano for El Shawaary and that will be a huge error and then I know that El Shawaary deal was rubbish overpaid and we lose a fwd.

IzzyC08 wrote:We sell Cassano for El Shawaary and that will be a huge error and then I know that El Shawaary deal was rubbish overpaid and we lose a fwd.

Apparently the decision will take place at milanello during the summer after Allegri checks the new kid out.

I like Cassano, but I'm also afraid of his temper. Paloschi may be able to give us a little more.

El Shawaary is a mistery still

I think we will be signing Hamsik, but who knows who Mr. X will be

-----------------------------Abbiati
Abate-------------Nesta-------------Silva-----------Taiwo

---------------------------Van Bommel
--------------------Prince---------------Hamsik

-----------------------------Cassano
------------------Pato----------------------Zlatan

Superpeppe wrote:Rumor has it that with the signing of the 18 year old from serie B Milan will have 7 forward so one between paloschi or cassano will have to leave.
Which one do you guys thing should go?

Neither because I think both of them are better than Shaarawy.

And Cassano as an AMF? I don't think he can do it. We need a real CAM. Badly. If Hamsik were to come he would play as a CAM. I still hope for Ganso.

Now they are also talking about Hulk