McAllister vs Enzo?

I remember watching the WC n generally were more impressed with McAllister than Enzo, but I mainly focused on watching Messi so not sure But I also remember Enzo got the most hype afterwards n also basically much of the Argentina team did, n each player had their role, etc. Anyway, so both being the main man in MF straight away for one is leading the table now with Liverpool n they other mid table with Chelsea.

Which is the better player do u think? Which role or position is their best n are they currently playing that n at their best or not u think?

MacAllister always was better imo

I may be mistaken but I thought Enzo received more hype than Mac Allister after the WC. Their respective transfer fees kind of prove this, Enzo went for well over 100m.

I remember being quite impressed with Enzo but Mac was great too, along with Messi and Alvarez. That team just felt like it was predestined to win.

Enzo made a poor career choice by moving to Chelsea, would like to see him elsewhere.

Yea Enzo definitely was so hyped by everyone... I forgot about the prices... but Chelsea is paying crazy money due to the new owners prolly?

Them Morocco players like Amrabats n Guardiol iirc were also, but have been pretty underwhelming for their new clubs?

That team just gelled well enough, even the likes of De Paul shined Hes prolly underrated, but he was the main 'water carrier' for Messi... its was such a beautiful WC run

A good career choice will take you a long way. Caicedo as well...

Chelsea is where young careers go to die. Has been true for like a decade.