clichy to city official

chemicalboy99 wrote:

Lex wrote:Would half the player who are currently wasting away at City be there if Sheik whatever hadn't bought them. Yes or no

Is wasting away better than being consistent under achievers? Yes or No

wasting away on the bench isn't underachieving?

Immaculate_Mole wrote:

chemicalboy99 wrote:

ali8775 wrote:

chemicalboy99 wrote:

ali8775 wrote:

chemicalboy99 wrote:

ali8775 wrote:

chemicalboy99 wrote:

Lex wrote:Yeah, can't wait for Dzeko to score 2 more goals next season

Quite amazing we only required that minute a contribution off him to finish above your lot and actually win something.

lol yeah , tell yourself that it was your sides effort that let you finish ahead of us .

sure it helps you go to sleep at night.

That over 38 we were just err better maybe

So does surrendering a 4-0 lead at Newcastle....

yeah, our Aston Villa and Sunderland games? Say hello

So does surrendering a 4-0 lead at Newcastle....

lol did you even watch that game ? I'm sure if you did you wouldn't be bringing it up to help your side lol

Why not?

We won at Newcastle....thats my point

To this day i still dont know how we battered your goal with attempts but some how did'nt score, still a bit confused on how we only managed to score 1 from 20 attempts but there you go.

Probably because you were 2-0 down after 5 minutes.

Stop the Drama ladies.

ali8775 wrote:

chemicalboy99 wrote:

Lex wrote:Would half the player who are currently wasting away at City be there if Sheik whatever hadn't bought them. Yes or no

Is wasting away better than being consistent under achievers? Yes or No

wasting away on the bench isn't underachieving?

Its called squad depth.

How it works is this......if a couple of key players are missing you hope the squad can give you more than a couple of wins in the final dozen games.

chemicalboy99 wrote:

Immaculate_Mole wrote:

chemicalboy99 wrote:

ali8775 wrote:

chemicalboy99 wrote:

ali8775 wrote:

chemicalboy99 wrote:

ali8775 wrote:

chemicalboy99 wrote:

Lex wrote:Yeah, can't wait for Dzeko to score 2 more goals next season

Quite amazing we only required that minute a contribution off him to finish above your lot and actually win something.

lol yeah , tell yourself that it was your sides effort that let you finish ahead of us .

sure it helps you go to sleep at night.

That over 38 we were just err better maybe

So does surrendering a 4-0 lead at Newcastle....

yeah, our Aston Villa and Sunderland games? Say hello

So does surrendering a 4-0 lead at Newcastle....

lol did you even watch that game ? I'm sure if you did you wouldn't be bringing it up to help your side lol

Why not?

We won at Newcastle....thats my point

To this day i still dont know how we battered your goal with attempts but some how did'nt score, still a bit confused on how we only managed to score 1 from 20 attempts but there you go.

Probably because you were 2-0 down after 5 minutes.

Haha i know but we still had more enough to attempts to get back into the game lol that was my point

What a shell of a human being. Used to love clichy.

He has spat in the face of wenger and arsenal fans by doing this as his return reception deserves to be hostile.

You guys have Gibbs (future english LB) You'll be fine.

Gil wrote:Gael Clichy in 2009: "I really believe if you are a player who thinks only about money then you could end up at Manchester City.

ffs!!!!!! ;/

Thank you for bringing that up, I forgot about that. +1

chemicalboy99 wrote:

ali8775 wrote:

chemicalboy99 wrote:

Lex wrote:Would half the player who are currently wasting away at City be there if Sheik whatever hadn't bought them. Yes or no

Is wasting away better than being consistent under achievers? Yes or No

wasting away on the bench isn't underachieving?

Its called squad depth.

How it works is this......if a couple of key players are missing you hope the squad can give you more than a couple of wins in the final dozen .

so...being wasted on the bench while being part of the squad depth > playing consistently ?

Arquitecto wrote:What a shell of a human being. Used to love clichy.

He has spat in the face of wenger and arsenal fans by doing this as his return reception deserves to be hostile.

You guys have Gibbs (future english LB) You'll be fine.

All the Arsenal fans are happy that he is gone. he was our weakest link in many games, we just dont like it he is going to City for trophies not the money.

chemicalboy99 wrote:
lol did you even watch that game ? I'm sure if you did you wouldn't be bringing it up to help your side lol

Why not?

We won at Newcastle....thats my point :roll: [/quote]

Boom, headshot...

No more massive quotes please

Clichy made a logical move if silverware is what he seeks.

We'll see next season. I'll make sure to bookmark this thread

Lex wrote:

St_Nick09_of_Goal wrote:Man city is providing an opportunity for players to make an excellent living and to compete for trophies.

So in other words, they go to City for money and glory

yes in a way. Most of the players they bought were good/great players in decent/good teams. bar few names, not many had much chance for glory, and werent exactly sought after by big clubs. they did some crazy spending, but their sin was to buy too many, and to pay over the market.

it can sound exciting to see another "chelsea" forming with unlimited ressources and to know you will find yourself in a position to win things with great great players next to you.

Wasn't it Arsenal fans who said he is a good player ?

Wasn't it everyone else who said he wasn't?

I just find it strange all of a sudden Arsenal fans are saying he isn't good.

People hating on nasri.. nasri has one of the best first touches and is one of the best dribblers in the prem league. bottles it when it maters? he was one of arsenals best players vs barca

Well all that any decent football fan can do now is hope City never wins anything.

Well I hope Kolarov has fun rotting on the bench.