Is this really Mila Kunis ?

I can't wait to show this to my mate. Mila is his dream girl.

RealGunner wrote:Apparently a pic of her without the make up



from 9/10 to 3/10 lol

She doesn't look that bad tbh. She must've just woke up and was running late or something because her face is puffy(which is natural for both men and women). I've seen way worse girls without any make up.

Kim Kardashian, as much as I don't like her, I have to admit she looks beautiful without make up. She is just naturally stunning. So is Beyonce.

Keira Knightly

RED wrote:

RealGunner wrote:Apparently a pic of her without the make up



from 9/10 to 3/10 lol

She doesn't look that bad tbh. She must've just woke up and was running late or something because her face is puffy(which is natural for both men and women). I've seen way worse girls without any make up.

Kim Kardashian, as much as I don't like her, I have to admit she looks beautiful without make up. She is just naturally stunning. So is Beyonce.

To be fair, Kim spends a ridiculous amount of money on skin treatment, in order to avoid ever looking like Mila Kunis does in that picture. I watched a short documentary about the Kardashians, while I was in the US, and it's completely ridiculous how many different types of beauty treatments Kim Kardashian goes through every week.

Mamad wrote:I think keira Knightly is better looking than Johanson, Watson and Portman.

Knightley is elegant looking (The Duchess, Anna Karenina) and scruffy looking (Bend it like Beckham, Domino) at the same time. Just not my cup of tea mostly because she just doesn't have any real curves. Neither does Mila Kunis, Natalie Portman or Emma Watson for that matter.

Only one is Scarlett

Harry Redknapp wrote:Anne Hathaway, the only actress that looks better without make up




as for every single GL member, would bang kunis/jolie/watson/etc WITH or WITHOUT make up.

because once you get one of those names in your cv, the real hidden hot gem girls will be looking after you. it gives you a psychological boost, even if jolie hasn't shaved her thing for 23423 years.

Portman is still the king though

Wow, you mean that Anne Hathaway looked emaciated and sick when acting in a movie where her character was emaciated and sick? How awful!

no im saying she can look damn ugly when natural, thats all dont over think it

But it's not her natural state, as Sepi was referring to. It's a specific instance where she was MEANT to look less attractive and healthy, as such it's no more applicable to the discussion than if she'd had movie make-up on.

forget everything they added on her to make her look less attractive, forget the haircut it doesnt even bother me
im talking about the asymmetry as well as the weak chin in combination with the big smile
her natural state would be longer hair andddd what else?

again its down to taste as i believe in the first pic of her posted in this thread she doesnt look attractive either

Idiot wrote:

He looks way better in this picture.

Thimmy wrote:

Idiot wrote:

He looks way better in this picture.

he really doesn't, but i get your point, after all it was just a photo i based my judgement on she will obviously look better given the right angles and shadows but my main point is that she has facial flaws, she definitely looks worse without make up,of course she can be attractive hence being actress but she is definitely not the woman to prize for her natural look

To be fair, just about any woman can look decently attractive with the right make-up on.

Thimmy wrote:To be fair, just about any woman can look decently attractive with the right make-up on.

What?thats not true at all.fat chicks with make up look even uglier most of the time

Idiot wrote:im talking about the asymmetry as well as the weak chin in combination with the big smile

I know, right? If only she could be perfect like.....um......er................sorry, who's perfect again?

Ganso wrote:

Thimmy wrote:To be fair, just about any woman can look decently attractive with the right make-up on.

What?thats not true at all.fat chicks with make up look even uglier most of the time

With the right make-up on. You're referring to people who don't have the right make-up and don't know how to apply it on themselves. And yeah, it is true: applying the right kind of make-up can make just about any face decently appealing. I have a friend who's a make-up artist, and I've seen quite a few examples of how make-up can make woman go from looking uninteresting to potentially hot. I didn't know shit about make-up before, and it doesn't interest me, but after witnessing it being applied on regular people by professional artists, I realised how dramatically it can change someone's appearance. It's actually pretty mind-blowing We are, after all, talking about actors.. and most of them have their personal make-up artists/stylists and whatnot.

Lex wrote:

Idiot wrote:im talking about the asymmetry as well as the weak chin in combination with the big smile

I know, right? If only she could be perfect like.....um......er................sorry, who's perfect again?

she doesn't have to be perfect, but her flaws shouldn't be that noticable either if people want to consider her face 'one of the most attractive natural faces'
personally i see a big difference on her face with make up on it and without

perfect symmetry can be unattractive anyway

Ganso wrote:

Thimmy wrote:To be fair, just about any woman can look decently attractive with the right make-up on.

What?thats not true at all.fat chicks with make up look even uglier most of the time

Well you're in for some surprises then if you don't realize the potential of make-up.

Regarding women without make up.

There was this Japanese girl that I was rehearsing with for a recital.

She looked beautiful and very intimidating. Then one morning...

"Oh for %#!@ sake!"

Then I realized, man.. even my past girlfriends looked awkward without make up.

Women, deceiving men since the discovery of cosmetics.

So am I the only one who thinks she looks average even with makeup? Never got the hype tbh.