Warning Level

by The Messiah Tue Sep 04, 2012 10:25 am

I propose that warning level should be increase to 10% deduction per warning, it makes sense that way, 25% is to high.

So you make just 1 mistake and 25% off, another heated debate another 25% gone, then one unjust 25% and lastly just one more mistake then you are off, that's too short, we need more time.

Also there should suspension instead of banning.

My Ideal, my proposal.

by 7amood11 Tue Sep 04, 2012 10:32 am

No, the current method is best.

If you fail to control yourself 4 times and keep trolling/insulting each time then you deserve to be banned.

by rwo power Tue Sep 04, 2012 10:33 am

Persons who are out of warning level get a temporary ban of 1 or 2 weeks. That is just a suspension. Permanent bans are for posters who show that they don't learn from temporary bans or who commit grave offenses, among them for example setting up a secondary account when they got a temporary ban.

by The Messiah Tue Sep 04, 2012 10:36 am

rwo power wrote:Persons who are out of warning level get a temporary ban of 1 or 2 weeks. That is just a suspension. Permanent bans are for offenses are for posters who show that they don't learn for temporary bans or who commit grave offenses, among them for example setting up a secondary account when they got a temporary ban.

Makes more sense now.

That means I won't get ban if I get another warning after-all. drinking