Barça present complaint about condition of Giuseppe Meazza pitch

Izzy baresi M99 and cookie monsters logic: hmm I can't prove LM's posts wrong so I'll just put a facepalm.

harhar11 wrote:

Le Samourai wrote:So, more friction = more slippery.



"Seriously"

I guess that you have never played football on a pitch like that...

what do you think is the reason for the studs? Now what happends if the reason for the studs becomes mute because the grass all over the pitch coming out of its place? The chance of slipping becomes higher, no?

I guess Barca have never played on a pitch like that either not only Le Samourai

Albiceleste wrote:Izzy baresi M99 and cookie monsters logic: hmm I can't prove LM's posts wrong so I'll just put a facepalm.

, so you are the former LM, if I knew I wouldn't have even bothered.

Albiceleste wrote:

TheBlueArmy wrote:

Albiceleste wrote:

TheBlueArmy wrote:

Albiceleste wrote:halamadrid2, just listen to his words:



"the most important thing is the pitch is different"

excuses for why he couldn't win in russia.

your comparing mourinho complaining about the pitch to barcelona LODGING A COMPLAINT TO UEFA about the pitch?

I don't know whether to do one of these

or this :lol!:

No I'm not comparing them, I'm saying Mourinho DID complain like Se7en said he didn't read the thread next time

Se7en wrote:Difference between Real and Barca: Real Madrid Played on an artificial CSKA's turf, no complaint. Barca played on grass, yet crying.

Read the thread next time

did you ever think that he meant a complaint to uefa?

So when did I compare the two incidents like you accused me of doing?

excuses for why he couldn't win in russia.

mourinho stating that the pitch is better in madrid (if you want to only focus on the 47 second video as opposed to the whole press conference) is hardly the same then a complaint to uefa no? And it isn't even an excuse, players hate playing on artificial pitches, but apparently barca don't like playing on grass either...

I don't need to quote you. The whole thread s there for everyone to see.

LM logic: The pitch was slippery because they didn't water it.

Albiceleste wrote:Izzy baresi M99 and cookie monsters logic: hmm I can't prove LM's posts wrong so I'll just put a facepalm.

We've proven our point, you're just too retarded/bias to realize it

TheBlueArmy wrote:

Albiceleste wrote:

TheBlueArmy wrote:

Albiceleste wrote:

TheBlueArmy wrote:

Albiceleste wrote:halamadrid2, just listen to his words:



"the most important thing is the pitch is different"

excuses for why he couldn't win in russia.

your comparing mourinho complaining about the pitch to barcelona LODGING A COMPLAINT TO UEFA about the pitch?

I don't know whether to do one of these

or this :lol!:

No I'm not comparing them, I'm saying Mourinho DID complain like Se7en said he didn't read the thread next time

Se7en wrote:Difference between Real and Barca: Real Madrid Played on an artificial CSKA's turf, no complaint. Barca played on grass, yet crying.

Read the thread next time

did you ever think that he meant a complaint to uefa?

So when did I compare the two incidents like you accused me of doing?

excuses for why he couldn't win in russia.

mourinho stating that the pitch is better in madrid (if you want to only focus on the 47 second video as opposed to the whole press conference) is hardly the same then a complaint to uefa no? And it isn't even an excuse, players hate playing on artificial pitches, but apparently barca don't like playing on grass either...

How many times do I need to repeat myself? When did I compare the two inicidents?

izzy wrote: I don't need to quote you. The whole thread s there for everyone to see.

LM logic: The pitch was slippery because they didn't water it.

When did I say that? Again putting words in my mouth, seems to be a hobby of yours.


Izzy logic: "Hmm I can't prove him wrong, I'll just facepalm him or put words in his mouth"

Cookie Monster wrote:

Albiceleste wrote:Izzy baresi M99 and cookie monsters logic: hmm I can't prove LM's posts wrong so I'll just put a facepalm.

We've proven our point, you're just too retarded/bias to realize it

Except you didn't prove any point, the whole "it was too humid to water" excuse is bullshit, they had ill intentions and refused to water the pitch like agreed.

Albiceleste wrote:

izzy wrote: I don't need to quote you. The whole thread s there for everyone to see.

LM logic: The pitch was slippery because they didn't water it.

When did I say that? Again putting words in my mouth, seems to be a hobby of yours.


Izzy logic: "Hmm I can't prove him wrong, I'll just facepalm him or put words in his mouth"

Cookie Monster wrote:

Albiceleste wrote:Izzy baresi M99 and cookie monsters logic: hmm I can't prove LM's posts wrong so I'll just put a facepalm.

We've proven our point, you're just too retarded/bias to realize it

Except you didn't prove any point, the whole "it was too humid to water" excuse is bullshit, they had ill intentions and refused to water the pitch like agreed.

Are you serious? I don't like insulting ppl but man you're making it hard. How is that excuse bullshit? Humidity on the pitch would make the field moist (science, learn it), so they decided to not make the problem worse by watering it. The problem with the pitch is that it was a little slippery, how would watering it make it better? There was a reason they broke the agreement, and it was for the good of both teams.

How are you not understanding this man?

So if I don't accept their excuse/your opinion I'm biased and retarded? okay buddy.

^^Well, yeah, in this case. The humidity excuse was clearly valid, as was shown by the slipperiness of the field. If basic science eludes you, then you're kind of retarded, sorry 'buddy'.

And I still don't understand how you're complaining about Milan not watering the pitch, when the reason for the complaint was that the pitch was too wet and slippery. That's the most flawed logic I've seen in a while.

Albiceleste wrote:

TheBlueArmy wrote:

Albiceleste wrote:

TheBlueArmy wrote:

Albiceleste wrote:

TheBlueArmy wrote:

Albiceleste wrote:halamadrid2, just listen to his words:



"the most important thing is the pitch is different"

excuses for why he couldn't win in russia.

your comparing mourinho complaining about the pitch to barcelona LODGING A COMPLAINT TO UEFA about the pitch?

I don't know whether to do one of these

or this :lol!:

No I'm not comparing them, I'm saying Mourinho DID complain like Se7en said he didn't read the thread next time

Se7en wrote:Difference between Real and Barca: Real Madrid Played on an artificial CSKA's turf, no complaint. Barca played on grass, yet crying.

Read the thread next time

did you ever think that he meant a complaint to uefa?

So when did I compare the two incidents like you accused me of doing?

excuses for why he couldn't win in russia.

mourinho stating that the pitch is better in madrid (if you want to only focus on the 47 second video as opposed to the whole press conference) is hardly the same then a complaint to uefa no? And it isn't even an excuse, players hate playing on artificial pitches, but apparently barca don't like playing on grass either...

How many times do I need to repeat myself? When did I compare the two inicidents?

you did when you posted that video...

Cookie Monster wrote:^^Well, yeah, in this case. The humidity excuse was clearly valid, as was shown by the slipperiness of the field. If basic science eludes you, then you're kind of retarded, sorry 'buddy'.

And I still don't understand how you're complaining about Milan not watering the pitch, when the reason for the complaint was that the pitch was too wet and slippery. That's the most flawed logic I've seen in a while.

So who's logic is that? When did I say that? I didn't. So maybe you should be worried about your own retardedness.

Anyway, I'm done dealing with these fools, had fun putting your points to shame :lol!:

Milan showed their true colors in this situation and it's time to focus on the second leg.

Albiceleste wrote:

Cookie Monster wrote:^^Well, yeah, in this case. The humidity excuse was clearly valid, as was shown by the slipperiness of the field. If basic science eludes you, then you're kind of retarded, sorry 'buddy'.

And I still don't understand how you're complaining about Milan not watering the pitch, when the reason for the complaint was that the pitch was too wet and slippery. That's the most flawed logic I've seen in a while.

So who's logic is that? When did I say that? I didn't. So maybe you should be worried about your own retardedness.

Anyway, I'm done dealing with these fools, had fun putting your points to shame :lol!:

Milan showed their true colors in this situation and it's time to focus on the second leg.

That's YOUR logic. Although you may not have said it explicitly, that's the logic that your comments reflect.

You've put no one to shame. All you've done is proven how dense you really are. Carry on with your life. Maybe grab a couple books, get a little education, or don't, I really don't care. All I can really say is that I'm disappointed in myself for even trying to reason with someone as dense as you.

How is Mou complaining when he is STATING that the pitch is different? Whole different things.

Also, I didnt bring Madrid into this, harhar was as shown here:

oh and le samurai did you criticize mou when he complained about the moscow pitch? I bet that you didnt as we all know how hypocritical real madrid fans are...

Now you can kindly jog on

Harhar brought Real Madrid into this when it wasn't even needed. Now this thread is either gonna move or locked because of it. It probably was gonna get it but it has now turned into another damn Real vs Barca argument.

Thanks...

Barcelona fans' logic: If the pitch isn't watered then it's wet.

I refuse to argue with imbeciles,I'm out.

Barcelona crying like little girls, and Xavi and company being H&R like usual... lol

The San Siro pitch was really wet and Pique was complaining that it wasn't wet enough? That is some flawed logic. What where you smoking Pique?

Even Milan was slipping on the field. One slip that almost gifted Barcelona an easy goal.
How pathetic by Barcelona. Showing their true colors at last...

HAHA This excuse is almost as good as the volcano one. Barca need to be more gracious when they don't get their intended result.

Who'd have thunk it? Another thread derailed into Madrid vs Barca nonsense.

Adria Carmona(ex barca player who plays for milans youth team) said to cadena SER that the pitch was more than fine on saturday. So something most have happend during the week.

This is his exact quote "El sábado el césped estaba bien. Me sorprendió".

Translated "The pitch was good on Saturday. It suprised me"

hmm...

harhar11 wrote:Adria Carmona(ex barca player who plays for milans youth team) said to cadena SER that the pitch was more than fine on saturday. So something most have happend during the week.

This is his exact quote "El sábado el césped estaba bien. Me sorprendió".

Translated "The pitch was good on Saturday. It suprised me"

hmm...

Yes ... It's called frustration

Maybe Milan should have watered the pitch properly. I bet Barca would have loved this: http://www.eblogx.com/Bilder/13292/Schlamm-Fussball-Weltmeisterschaft/

Whincelona

its official:

barca are pathetic bad losers