Laliga teams in debt will not be allowed to participate in the league

The economic control, which must also be ratified by the Sports Council, provides penalties for clubs such as the loss of points, monetary fines, prohibition of entry in the competition and removal of it. To avoid such situations, the LFP sends messages to the teams to be in breach marking in the rules.
All teams are required to submit all types of audits that analyze the financial status of each identity each season, a list of procurement operations and sales of players, a balance between expenditure and income, especially in what refers to the wage cost templates; not allow clubs to keep debt at the end of each year with players, other teams and public administration, ie, players' wages, transfer payments and property.

Although the positions are quite distant in the beginning of this negotiation, the president of AFE desire moved his command to "come to fruition together" and find ways to "not repeat" the situations of default by the lack commitment of the clubs, and the use made ​​of the Insolvency Act.

UD Salamanca footballer Juan Pablo De Miguel "Juanpe" was presented with a commemorative T-shirt on behalf of all players who participated in this project to players strike, which was held from 11 to January 25, 2011 in L'Alfas del Pi (Alicante) and which will be second edition between 1 and August 15 next.

iftikhar wrote:Which club DOESN'T have debt!!!

Messi wrote:

iftikhar wrote:Which club DOESN'T have debt!!!

MADrid. The club for rich people.

♠Ace wrote:

Messi wrote:

iftikhar wrote:Which club DOESN'T have debt!!!

MADrid. The club for rich people.

barcelona would be rich too if they cut the ref's salary

iftikhar wrote:Which club DOESN'T have debt!!!

balance between expenditure and income

halamadrid2 wrote:budget

halamadrid2 wrote:balance between expenditure(wages, transfer sums etc) and income(your net income)

say villarreal go out on a spending spree and buy players for over 80 mill + pay astronomically high wages to keep most of their important guys such as nilmar, borja etc + they sell very few if any players

and we all know that they dont get very much in income so if you subtract these they will most likely make a loss of a certain sum of money and will have a negative value come the fiscal year<-----------they wont allow that



nor will they allow the drenthe type of situation to happen where he didnt get paid for a couple of montth b/c they didnt have any caash, they will likely go further and further into deep mess if things are to escelate

babun1024 wrote:

halamadrid2 wrote:balance between expenditure(wages, transfer sums etc) and income(your net income)

say villarreal go out on a spending spree and buy players for over 80 mill + pay astronomically high wages to keep most of their important guys such as nilmar, borja etc + they sell very few if any players

and we all know that they dont get very much in income so if you subtract these they will most likely make a loss of a certain sum of money and will have a negative value come the fiscal year<-----------they wont allow that



nor will they allow the drenthe type of situation to happen where he didnt get paid for a couple of montth b/c they didnt have any caash, they will likely go further and further into deep mess if things are to escelate

So basically, what i meant in the first post.The income has to be greater or equal to the expenditure during a fiscal year Having debt isn't a problem then, making debt is a problem

Ace wrote:barcelona would be rich too if they cut the ref's salary

boss wrote:@ halamadrid2 !are you drunk by any chance?? he he heeeeeeeeHH !

babun1024 wrote:

halamadrid2 wrote:balance between expenditure(wages, transfer sums etc) and income(your net income)

say villarreal go out on a spending spree and buy players for over 80 mill + pay astronomically high wages to keep most of their important guys such as nilmar, borja etc + they sell very few if any players

and we all know that they dont get very much in income so if you subtract these they will most likely make a loss of a certain sum of money and will have a negative value come the fiscal year<-----------they wont allow that



nor will they allow the drenthe type of situation to happen where he didnt get paid for a couple of montth b/c they didnt have any caash, they will likely go further and further into deep mess if things are to escelate

So basically, what i meant in the first post.The income has to be greater or equal to the expenditure during a fiscal year Having debt isn't a problem then, making debt is a problem