Juventus to play a 4-2-1-3 vs Cesena(4-3-3), Quag Starts

Camurrìa.Sto.Stronzo wrote:

The_ItalianFool wrote:

Camurrìa.Sto.Stronzo wrote:

The_ItalianFool wrote:

Camurrìa.Sto.Stronzo wrote:What's there to clarify?

You left, then you came back with goals. Sadly most of them have failed to achieve.

Sadly now, this objective is just exposing more and more.

Again, what the hell are you talking about?

Hiding something?

STOP TRYING TO SEEM SMART.

If you have something to say, say it! Stop beating around the bush.

And stop living in the past, "it took Cesena 50 years to beat us."

We were in 7th place the past 2 years, we have everything to prove still.

Condradicting again, but hey... the more exposure the better. Think twice before stating things about yourself Fabri. First goal, sadly not achieved. Second goal, failed. Third goal, bliss. What's your fourth?

Living the past? 'years of watching Calcio'. That's the past

LOLLLLL.

Even when I tell you to talk straight you can't even make a valid point. You are exposing your terribly low IQ if anything

Camurrìa.Sto.Stronzo wrote:

The_ItalianFool wrote:

Camurrìa.Sto.Stronzo wrote:

The_ItalianFool wrote:

Camurrìa.Sto.Stronzo wrote:What's there to clarify?

You left, then you came back with goals. Sadly most of them have failed to achieve.

Sadly now, this objective is just exposing more and more.

Again, what the hell are you talking about?

Hiding something?

STOP TRYING TO SEEM SMART.

If you have something to say, say it! Stop beating around the bush.

And stop living in the past, "it took Cesena 50 years to beat us."

We were in 7th place the past 2 years, we have everything to prove still.

Condradicting again, but hey... the more exposure the better. Think twice before stating things about yourself Fabri. First goal, sadly not achieved. Second goal, failed. Third goal, bliss. What's your fourth?

Living the past? 'years of watching Calcio'. That's the past

Living in the past is actually bringing up Moggi constantly and how it took teams 50 years to win against us. We live in the present. Hence our stance on this debate.

Shame on my IQ, it seems we measure intelligence this way. Wait, isn't that the past?

Il Pinguino wrote:

Camurrìa.Sto.Stronzo wrote:

The_ItalianFool wrote:

Camurrìa.Sto.Stronzo wrote:

The_ItalianFool wrote:

Camurrìa.Sto.Stronzo wrote:What's there to clarify?

You left, then you came back with goals. Sadly most of them have failed to achieve.

Sadly now, this objective is just exposing more and more.

Again, what the hell are you talking about?

Hiding something?

STOP TRYING TO SEEM SMART.

If you have something to say, say it! Stop beating around the bush.

And stop living in the past, "it took Cesena 50 years to beat us."

We were in 7th place the past 2 years, we have everything to prove still.

Condradicting again, but hey... the more exposure the better. Think twice before stating things about yourself Fabri. First goal, sadly not achieved. Second goal, failed. Third goal, bliss. What's your fourth?

Living the past? 'years of watching Calcio'. That's the past

Living in the past is actually bringing up Moggi constantly and how it took teams 50 years to win against us. We live in the present. Hence our stance on this debate.

So thanks for confirming that your years of watching Calcio is irrelavent

Camurrìa.Sto.Stronzo wrote:Shame on my IQ, it seems we measure intelligence this way. Wait, isn't that the past?

LMAO

I really didnt think it could get much better, but this is just priceless. :lol!:

Camurrìa.Sto.Stronzo wrote:

Il Pinguino wrote:

It's funny how you continuously miss the main point of every argument at hand. And what makes it better is each of your posts is followed up by a couple of as if your right all the time HA

The main point is not dropping any points while Milan is breathing down our neck. Cesena is one of the weakest teams in the league but that does not by any chances mean we are guaranteed any points. Just look at the standings. Nothing is guaranteed in Serie A because any team can win on any given day. Juventus is not yet back to the point where they can comfortably stomp on any team. WAKE UP

And yet 'years of Calcio' prove what is happening presently. :lol!:

Man you have a serious problem understanding what you read

From watching calcio for 21 years i've learned you should never underestimate an opponent. No matter what team you are. I have not only learned this from calcio but from watching other sports as well as playing them.

The_ItalianFool wrote:

Camurrìa.Sto.Stronzo wrote:Shame on my IQ, it seems we measure intelligence this way. Wait, isn't that the past?

LMAO

I really didnt think it could get much better, but this is just priceless. :lol!:

Gee, I should advice my dean to give everyone IQ tests before they're eligble in joining my school. Sadly, we live in a world full of Sciacca's

Il Pinguino wrote:

Camurrìa.Sto.Stronzo wrote:

Il Pinguino wrote:

It's funny how you continuously miss the main point of every argument at hand. And what makes it better is each of your posts is followed up by a couple of as if your right all the time HA

The main point is not dropping any points while Milan is breathing down our neck. Cesena is one of the weakest teams in the league but that does not by any chances mean we are guaranteed any points. Just look at the standings. Nothing is guaranteed in Serie A because any team can win on any given day. Juventus is not yet back to the point where they can comfortably stomp on any team. WAKE UP

And yet 'years of Calcio' prove what is happening presently. :lol!:

Man you have a serious problem understanding what you read

From watching calcio for 21 years i've learned you should never underestimate an opponent. No matter what team you are. I have not only learned this from calcio but from watching other sports as well as playing them.

So you watching Calcio in your first 3 years counts? I never knew we could remember such events at such a young age.

I believe it is time for a victory dance!

Camurrìa.Sto.Stronzo wrote:

Il Pinguino wrote:

Camurrìa.Sto.Stronzo wrote:

Il Pinguino wrote:

It's funny how you continuously miss the main point of every argument at hand. And what makes it better is each of your posts is followed up by a couple of as if your right all the time HA

The main point is not dropping any points while Milan is breathing down our neck. Cesena is one of the weakest teams in the league but that does not by any chances mean we are guaranteed any points. Just look at the standings. Nothing is guaranteed in Serie A because any team can win on any given day. Juventus is not yet back to the point where they can comfortably stomp on any team. WAKE UP

And yet 'years of Calcio' prove what is happening presently. :lol!:

Man you have a serious problem understanding what you read

From watching calcio for 21 years i've learned you should never underestimate an opponent. No matter what team you are. I have not only learned this from calcio but from watching other sports as well as playing them.

So you watching Calcio in your first 3 years counts? I never knew we could remember such events at such a young age.

Haha what makes this funny is how I knew you were gonna point this out to divert the topic in order to sound smart. Pointed it out to my friend who is with me now and we just burst in laughter after reading such a predictable response.

Even guessed the coffee smiley! :lol!:

:dance:

Tell your friend I say Hello.

Its not about underestimating Cesena though
Players like Quagliarella, Del Piero, Pazienza, Krasic are PROVEN

Are you telling me that Quagliarella in place of Vucinic is weakened to the degree that Juventus will lose? Hell, Juventus just drew with Napoli without Marchisio and will already play without Pirlo against Cesena.

I agree with penguino. it's bad enough that pirlo is out, u shouldn't risk every other area. However, I think quagliarella heroics will still give juve 3 pts

Luca wrote:Its not about underestimating Cesena though
Players like Quagliarella, Del Piero, Pazienza, Krasic are PROVEN

Are you telling me that Quagliarella in place of Vucinic is weakened to the degree that Juventus will lose? Hell, Juventus just drew with Napoli without Marchisio and will already play without Pirlo against Cesena.

"Someone is somewhat agreeing with me! Quick, HAIL THEM!"

LUCA=GOD

Luca wrote:Its not about underestimating Cesena though
Players like Quagliarella, Del Piero, Pazienza, Krasic are PROVEN

Are you telling me that Quagliarella in place of Vucinic is weakened to the degree that Juventus will lose? Hell, Juventus just drew with Napoli without Marchisio and will already play without Pirlo against Cesena.

No absolutely not as I think we can still win with Quag as he is quality. My point is I don't think this is quite the game to change our starting lineup. Sure the players can use some rest but lets not forget how hardworking our players are to begin with. I would use Quag and Krasic as subs and give them adequate time to play. However Milan are right behind us in the standings. And so far this team has looked confident at the top of the table and have certainly played with confidence. I don't see any reason(unless a player calls for it) to tamper with the starting 11.

Thank you for bringing this thread back on topic BTW

The_ItalianFool wrote:"Someone is somewhat agreeing with me! Quick, HAIL THEM!"

LUCA=GOD

Goal number 5, I await Goal # 6

zarola wrote:I agree with penguino. it's bad enough that pirlo is out, u shouldn't risk every other area. However, I think quagliarella heroics will still give juve 3 pts

Absolutely if there was one change I would do it is Quag for Vucinic.

Il Pinguino wrote:

Luca wrote:Its not about underestimating Cesena though
Players like Quagliarella, Del Piero, Pazienza, Krasic are PROVEN

Are you telling me that Quagliarella in place of Vucinic is weakened to the degree that Juventus will lose? Hell, Juventus just drew with Napoli without Marchisio and will already play without Pirlo against Cesena.

No absolutely not as I think we can still win with Quag as he is quality. My point is I don't think this is quite the game to change our starting lineup. Sure the players can use some rest but lets not forget how hardworking our players are to begin with. I would use Quag and Krasic as subs and give them adequate time to play. However Milan are right behind us in the standings. And so far this team has looked confident at the top of the table and have certainly played with confidence. I don't see any reason(unless a player calls for it) to tamper with the starting 11.

Thank you for bringing this thread back on topic BTW

Just got home from class and saw what happened to it, tried to address last relevant post.
I agree with you that Cesena should not be underestimated.
I would love for Quagliarella to get the start in this one, just looking forward to a good game (hopefully) above all else

u guys are hilarious :lol!:

TuttoJuve:

Bonucci, Pepe e Vucinic dovrebbero partire dalla panchina: al loro posto De Ceglie, Estigarribia e Quagliarella. Ma attenzione ad Elia, in grande spolvero nell'amichevole di ieri contro l'Entella Chiavari. Nel Cesena Candreva confermato a destra nel centrocampo a 4, mentra Bogdani prenderà il posto dell'indisponibile Malonga.

JUVENTUS: Buffon; Lichtsteiner, Barzagli, Chiellini, De Ceglie; Vidal, Pazienza, Marchisio; Estigarribia, Matri, Quagliarella A disposizione: Storari, Bonucci, Pepe, Elia, Giaccherini, Vucinic, Del Piero

CESENA: Antonioli; Ricci, Von Bergen, Rodriguez, Lauro; Candreva, Guana, Parolo, Martinho; Bogdani, Mutu A disposizione: Calderoni, Benalouane, Rossi, Arrigoni T., Djokovic, Eder, Rennella

4-3-3 with Estigarribia-Matri-Quagliarella attack, Marchisio-Pazienza-Vidal midfield

You see, SKY was right about Esti replacing Pepe

At least they both have Quagliarella starting

Thank you Conte and Pepe for letting Fabio play

Don't expect Quag and Matri to gel right away as it is the first time their playing togehter as in the startinf XI

They might surprise you

Luca wrote:They might surprise you

it took Matri and Vucinic a bit to gel, so who knows