Chamakh and Park

+12
Emaharg
6unner
Eman
Sushi Master
REWB
EL Patron
Raptorgunner
SamuelJayC
OLpower
urbaNRoots
bloodless
Highburied
16 posters

Go down

Chamakh and Park Empty Chamakh and Park

Post by Highburied Wed Nov 30, 2011 7:50 am

Yes the latter just arrived and needs more time but he hasnt done anything on his starting apps to show me he is an ideal backup of RVP.

Chamakh... he really has to go. One of the worst strikers we ever had.

Good examples are AOX, Coquelin and Frimpong, even Miquel... they always perform well.

Lets spend over 10m on a prodigy striker.

I'll bump this thread when RVP doesnt play.

Highburied
Highburied
Banned (Permanent)

Club Supported : Arsenal
Posts : 2630
Join date : 2011-06-06
Age : 40

Back to top Go down

Chamakh and Park Empty Re: Chamakh and Park

Post by bloodless Wed Nov 30, 2011 9:57 am

bendtner back

bloodless
Starlet
Starlet

Club Supported : Arsenal
Posts : 592
Join date : 2011-06-05

Back to top Go down

Chamakh and Park Empty Re: Chamakh and Park

Post by urbaNRoots Wed Nov 30, 2011 10:11 am

Chamakh should go, Park needs more time - he played like 3-4 games ffs.
urbaNRoots
urbaNRoots
First of his name

Club Supported : Arsenal
Posts : 17196
Join date : 2011-08-11

Back to top Go down

Chamakh and Park Empty Re: Chamakh and Park

Post by OLpower Wed Nov 30, 2011 10:23 am

Chamakh was one of the best striker in Ligue 1, he was a decent scorer and played very well for his team. Park was also the best player of his team.

But both were always starting in their previous clubs, they are not used to be bench players.

And if I remember correctly, Chamakh was a starter at Arsenal in the first half of last season and was scoring goals.
OLpower
OLpower
Banned (Permanent)

Posts : 1518
Join date : 2011-06-06

Back to top Go down

Chamakh and Park Empty Re: Chamakh and Park

Post by SamuelJayC Wed Nov 30, 2011 11:33 am

Goal.com sum it up well in their article on both strikers (the one about both failing the audition to be rvp's understudy)

I have no faith in either.

We MUST MUST MUST sign a top class striker in january.
SamuelJayC
SamuelJayC
Fan Favorite
Fan Favorite

Club Supported : Arsenal
Posts : 6396
Join date : 2011-06-06
Age : 32

https://twitter.com/samuelJayC

Back to top Go down

Chamakh and Park Empty Re: Chamakh and Park

Post by Raptorgunner Wed Nov 30, 2011 2:51 pm

I know Park has been at Arsenal only for a few months but him and Chamakh are no where near back up for RVP. We need Godoski at Arsenal.
Raptorgunner
Raptorgunner
World Class Contributor
World Class Contributor

Club Supported : Arsenal
Posts : 18057
Join date : 2011-06-05

Back to top Go down

Chamakh and Park Empty Re: Chamakh and Park

Post by EL Patron Wed Nov 30, 2011 3:13 pm

Surely Wenger has to get a striker in January.....Chamack and Park are not good enough. At this rate i would accept Defoe or even Zamora and thats saying something Very Happy
EL Patron
EL Patron
Fan Favorite
Fan Favorite

Club Supported : Arsenal
Posts : 6465
Join date : 2011-06-06
Age : 33

Back to top Go down

Chamakh and Park Empty Re: Chamakh and Park

Post by REWB Wed Nov 30, 2011 3:18 pm

joel campbell is looking great for lorient this season, man i wish we had gotten that permit.
REWB
REWB
Fan Favorite
Fan Favorite

Club Supported : Arsenal
Posts : 5436
Join date : 2011-06-05

Back to top Go down

Chamakh and Park Empty Re: Chamakh and Park

Post by Sushi Master Wed Nov 30, 2011 3:31 pm

I wouldn't cash in on Park just yet. He's barely played, FFS.

Chamakh should be loaned with option to buy, in case he picks up form and wants to come back. I don't understand how he was showing these great performances then completely dropped out of the map once VP went into God mode. It was to be a confidence issue.
Sushi Master
Sushi Master
Fan Favorite
Fan Favorite

Club Supported : Chelsea
Posts : 9392
Join date : 2011-06-05
Age : 33

Back to top Go down

Chamakh and Park Empty Re: Chamakh and Park

Post by Eman Wed Nov 30, 2011 3:34 pm

RedEyesWhiteBeard wrote:joel campbell is looking great for lorient this season, man i wish we had gotten that permit.
That might be jumping the gun a bit; Campbell has 2 goals in 10 games, which isn't bad but I don't think I'd say he is better than Park or Chamakh at this point.

Yesterday I was annoyed with Chamakh, but I'm pretty forgiving and right now I'm not so upset because as has been said he only really scores when he is starting regularly. Also, last season when he was scoring frequently, he had a lot of service, and offensive teammates who were also on fire, like Nasri. I still don't think he's good enough for the role we want him to play (substitute for RvP), but he isn't useless, and neither is Park. However, I would very much like us to buy a top-level striker who can give us options, even if it means these guys don't get a chance.


Last edited by Eman on Wed Nov 30, 2011 3:35 pm; edited 1 time in total
Eman
Eman
First Team
First Team

Club Supported : Arsenal
Posts : 3029
Join date : 2011-06-05
Age : 30

Back to top Go down

Chamakh and Park Empty Re: Chamakh and Park

Post by Raptorgunner Wed Nov 30, 2011 3:34 pm

RedEyesWhiteBeard wrote:joel campbell is looking great for lorient this season, man i wish we had gotten that permit.

We should be able to bring him back next year right?
Raptorgunner
Raptorgunner
World Class Contributor
World Class Contributor

Club Supported : Arsenal
Posts : 18057
Join date : 2011-06-05

Back to top Go down

Chamakh and Park Empty Re: Chamakh and Park

Post by EL Patron Wed Nov 30, 2011 3:41 pm

Eman wrote:
RedEyesWhiteBeard wrote:joel campbell is looking great for lorient this season, man i wish we had gotten that permit.
That might be jumping the gun a bit; Campbell has 2 goals in 10 games, which isn't bad but I don't think I'd say he is better than Park or Chamakh at this point.

Yesterday I was annoyed with Chamakh, but I'm pretty forgiving and right now I'm not so upset because as has been said he only really scores when he is starting regularly. Also, last season when he was scoring frequently, he had a lot of service, and offensive teammates who were also on fire, like Nasri. I still don't think he's good enough for the role we want him to play (substitute for RvP), but he isn't useless, and neither is Park. However, I would very much like us to buy a top-level striker who can give us options, even if it means these guys don't get a chance.

I think Chamack got jammy with his run of form since Bordeaux....don't think he is an Arsenal type of player
EL Patron
EL Patron
Fan Favorite
Fan Favorite

Club Supported : Arsenal
Posts : 6465
Join date : 2011-06-06
Age : 33

Back to top Go down

Chamakh and Park Empty Re: Chamakh and Park

Post by 6unner Wed Nov 30, 2011 7:07 pm

I agree with most that it is to early to think about getting rid of Park.

OLpower wrote:Park was also the best player of his team..

Best player on a top 5 team in a top league Cool.
Best player on a relegated team. Hmm not as exciting

6unner
First Team
First Team

Club Supported : Arsenal
Posts : 1428
Join date : 2011-06-06

Back to top Go down

Chamakh and Park Empty Re: Chamakh and Park

Post by Emaharg Wed Nov 30, 2011 7:44 pm

Park imo was just to get into the Asian market more sadly, Wenger has never really shown intention to use him in the EPL. Chamakh has no future and we need a quality forward someone who can make chances for themselves, unlike the back ups we currently have.
Emaharg
Emaharg
Starlet
Starlet

Posts : 811
Join date : 2011-06-06

Back to top Go down

Chamakh and Park Empty Re: Chamakh and Park

Post by Wilson37 Thu Dec 01, 2011 3:21 am

no question of Bendtner arising.. He is not doing anything special.. And do we need to tolerate him just because he is better than Chamakh..?
Wilson37
Wilson37
First Team
First Team

Club Supported : Arsenal
Posts : 2576
Join date : 2011-06-06
Age : 34

Back to top Go down

Chamakh and Park Empty Re: Chamakh and Park

Post by Sri Thu Dec 01, 2011 7:12 am

Wilson37 wrote:no question of Bendtner arising.. He is not doing anything special.. And do we need to tolerate him just because he is better than Chamakh..?

Bendtner is young. Too bad he doesn't have the patience to match his age. If he had the right attitude, he would be a top top striker by the time he is 27-28 and in peak form. For one, I'm pretty sure he is better than that Balotelli kid who is so infamous.

No point discussing him however, he doesn't want to come back to the Emirates. Time for us to get someone better.

Sri
Wer ko, der ko

Club Supported : RO Blank
Posts : 13950
Join date : 2011-06-06

Back to top Go down

Chamakh and Park Empty Re: Chamakh and Park

Post by boss Sat Dec 03, 2011 11:43 am

Well Chamakh has just proved that he's not 4asn even thought he looked 2be a great choice when we signed him !
Park...why the hell we signed him 2stay "in park" Embarassed or to play in field hmm also i've heard he must leave asn anyway within 2yrs max...reason...he's definitely obliged to serve @his country army...we shouldn't sign him ..IMO

boss
Starlet
Starlet

Club Supported : Arsenal
Posts : 896
Join date : 2011-06-12

Back to top Go down

Chamakh and Park Empty Re: Chamakh and Park

Post by SUPERCARTTS Sat Dec 03, 2011 10:37 pm

To be fair to Chamakh, he was ok against Citeh. Park didn't do anything wrong, but he struggled to get overly involved. A lot of it is purely down to rust. They both need more minutes- but RVP is on fire!
SUPERCARTTS
SUPERCARTTS
Starlet
Starlet

Posts : 915
Join date : 2011-06-06

Back to top Go down

Chamakh and Park Empty Re: Chamakh and Park

Post by Sponsored content


Sponsored content


Back to top Go down

Back to top

- Similar topics

 
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum