85million pounds spent on two players.....

by REWB Sat Sep 10, 2011 8:17 pm

and only 3 goals scored....

Torres and Carroll

85million pounds spent on two players..... Fernando-torres-chelsea-sad-cropped

85million pounds spent on two players..... Andy-carroll-007

by Swanhends Sat Sep 10, 2011 8:19 pm

by cheesy Sat Sep 10, 2011 8:37 pm

Well this is original.

by Eivindo Sat Sep 10, 2011 8:38 pm

biggest lol ever

by McAgger Sat Sep 10, 2011 9:19 pm

4 goals scored......just to correct you there.

by Zealous Sat Sep 10, 2011 9:20 pm

Dzeko > These guys Very Happy

by Highburied Sat Sep 10, 2011 9:22 pm

Last day of transfer desperation.

by RedAndWhiteArmy Sat Sep 10, 2011 9:25 pm

Dzeko + Aguero>>>>>Torres + Carroll

by Ganso Sat Sep 10, 2011 9:28 pm

both of them suck really bad,speciakky carrol....they wouldn't even make it to my brasileirao bench ffs.

by Grande_Milano Sat Sep 10, 2011 9:42 pm

Who thought Caroll will be a great player lol? Should ve gone for Lavezzi like they tried before

by Razza Sat Sep 10, 2011 9:45 pm

Being a proud Tifoso of Napoli, I hate to brag, but we struck some great deals, maybe not with Inler who I thought we could of gotten a lower price for the player. But with deals like Cavani who we got for only 17 million, now worth 30m +. The EPL in general Man Citty should stop spending so much money like this, as it's mostly money lost and money gained for those who gain the better end of the bargain. With just little spent, Napoli have grown to be a very competivtive club and we keep growing.

by Raptorgunner Sat Sep 10, 2011 10:03 pm

RedEyesWhiteBeard wrote:[color=darkred]and only 3 goals scored....

Torres and Carroll

85million pounds spent on two players..... Sad_puppy

by elm_baraja_shaman Sat Sep 10, 2011 10:11 pm

Raptorgunner wrote:
RedEyesWhiteBeard wrote:[color=darkred]and only 3 goals scored....

Torres and Carroll

beautiful puppy m8t... cheers

by REWB Sat Sep 10, 2011 11:02 pm

Raptorgunner wrote:
RedEyesWhiteBeard wrote:[color=darkred]and only 3 goals scored....

Torres and Carroll

what do you mean?

by Pedram Sat Sep 10, 2011 11:29 pm

Raptorgunner wrote:
RedEyesWhiteBeard wrote:[color=darkred]and only 3 goals scored....

Torres and Carroll

God i wanna squeeze this puppy. so cute

by El Chelsea Fuerte Sun Sep 11, 2011 12:14 am

Ah well.

Better than playing safe and spending no money and living with an average squad that is bound to finish outside the Top 4 sooner than later.

Risks are worth taking.

by RedOranje Sun Sep 11, 2011 12:20 am

Actually... 50m spent, as we specifically asked for Carroll + 15m so the 35m that bought Carroll went from Chelsea to Newcastle.

by El Chelsea Fuerte Sun Sep 11, 2011 12:23 am

RedOranje wrote:Actually... 50m spent, as we specifically asked for Carroll + 15m so the 35m that bought Carroll went from Chelsea to Newcastle.

Still means you spent 35m on Carroll...

by baresi Sun Sep 11, 2011 12:30 am

english_jewel wrote:
RedOranje wrote:Actually... 50m spent, as we specifically asked for Carroll + 15m so the 35m that bought Carroll went from Chelsea to Newcastle.

Still means you spent 35m on Carroll...

Not really, they cant care less if you got him for 10 Euros or 100M, they got what they asked for/

by El Chelsea Fuerte Sun Sep 11, 2011 12:35 am

baresi wrote:
english_jewel wrote:
RedOranje wrote:Actually... 50m spent, as we specifically asked for Carroll + 15m so the 35m that bought Carroll went from Chelsea to Newcastle.

Still means you spent 35m on Carroll...
Not really, they cant care less if you got him for 10 Euros or 100M, they got what they asked for/

Liverpool agreed to pay Newcastle 35m for Carroll from the money Chelsea were giving for Torres.

Even if we made a deal with them that we would pay for Carroll as a way to complete the 50m price tag, how does that not account to Liverpool paying 35m for Carroll? Sure they didn't directly pay for him, but they did pay for him nevertheless. Otherwise Carroll would be our player. Or would Liverpool have accepted a 15m for Torres?

by Guest Sun Sep 11, 2011 12:39 am

I have zero problems with the money we've spent. 3 goals in 13 shots >> 1 goal in 38 Very Happy

Kenny should really start Andy vs Spurs....he created a lot of space for Suarez and Downing today when he came on with Bellamy. Not to mention won an amazing 50/50 tackle with Showcross in their box.

No problem in my part...Carroll is a project for me, he is very young, and his game on the ground will get better surroundered with Luis and coached by Kenny, and he'll be a complete striker in 2 years. All a learning curve as Fergie put it (talking about DDG). I never expected him to be world class from day 1

by baresi Sun Sep 11, 2011 12:40 am

english_jewel wrote:
baresi wrote:
english_jewel wrote:
RedOranje wrote:Actually... 50m spent, as we specifically asked for Carroll + 15m so the 35m that bought Carroll went from Chelsea to Newcastle.

Still means you spent 35m on Carroll...
Not really, they cant care less if you got him for 10 Euros or 100M, they got what they asked for/

Liverpool agreed to pay Newcastle 35m for Carroll from the money Chelsea were giving for Torres.

Even if we made a deal with them that we would pay for Carroll as a way to complete the 50m price tag, how does that not account to Liverpool paying 35m for Carroll? Sure they didn't directly pay for him, but they did pay for him nevertheless. Or would Liverpool have accepted a 15m for Torres?

My reply was based on what RedOrange said, I am not aware of how the entire deal went, but if Pool asked for Carroll+15m then I would stick with what I said, if they asked for 50m then I guess they got robbed for Carroll.

by El Chelsea Fuerte Sun Sep 11, 2011 12:40 am

Sepi wrote:
No problem in my part...Carroll is a project for me, I never expected him to be world class from day 1

He will surely come out good.

by RedOranje Sun Sep 11, 2011 12:41 am

english_jewel wrote:
baresi wrote:
english_jewel wrote:
RedOranje wrote:Actually... 50m spent, as we specifically asked for Carroll + 15m so the 35m that bought Carroll went from Chelsea to Newcastle.

Still means you spent 35m on Carroll...
Not really, they cant care less if you got him for 10 Euros or 100M, they got what they asked for/

Liverpool agreed to pay Newcastle 35m for Carroll from the money Chelsea were giving for Torres.

Even if we made a deal with them that we would pay for Carroll as a way to complete the 50m price tag, how does that not account to Liverpool paying 35m for Carroll? Sure they didn't directly pay for him, but they did pay for him nevertheless. Otherwise Carroll would be our player. Or would Liverpool have accepted a 15m for Torres?

No, we told Chelsea we wanted 15m on top of whatever it cost to buy a replacement. The negotiations for Carroll were between Newcastle and Chelsea.

by El Chelsea Fuerte Sun Sep 11, 2011 12:42 am

baresi wrote:
english_jewel wrote:
baresi wrote:
english_jewel wrote:
RedOranje wrote:Actually... 50m spent, as we specifically asked for Carroll + 15m so the 35m that bought Carroll went from Chelsea to Newcastle.

Still means you spent 35m on Carroll...
Not really, they cant care less if you got him for 10 Euros or 100M, they got what they asked for/

Liverpool agreed to pay Newcastle 35m for Carroll from the money Chelsea were giving for Torres.

Even if we made a deal with them that we would pay for Carroll as a way to complete the 50m price tag, how does that not account to Liverpool paying 35m for Carroll? Sure they didn't directly pay for him, but they did pay for him nevertheless. Or would Liverpool have accepted a 15m for Torres?
My reply was based on what RedOrange said, I am not aware of how the entire deal went, but if Pool asked for Carroll+15m then I would stick with what I said, if they asked for 50m then I guess they got robbed for Carroll.

How can Liverpool ask Carroll+15m from us when Carroll never was our player??? :facepalm:

by Sponsored content

85million pounds spent on two players.....

85million pounds spent on two players.....

Re: 85million pounds spent on two players.....

Re: 85million pounds spent on two players.....

Re: 85million pounds spent on two players.....

Re: 85million pounds spent on two players.....

Re: 85million pounds spent on two players.....

Re: 85million pounds spent on two players.....

Re: 85million pounds spent on two players.....

Re: 85million pounds spent on two players.....

Re: 85million pounds spent on two players.....

Re: 85million pounds spent on two players.....

Re: 85million pounds spent on two players.....

Re: 85million pounds spent on two players.....

Re: 85million pounds spent on two players.....

Re: 85million pounds spent on two players.....

Re: 85million pounds spent on two players.....

Re: 85million pounds spent on two players.....

Re: 85million pounds spent on two players.....

Re: 85million pounds spent on two players.....

Re: 85million pounds spent on two players.....

Re: 85million pounds spent on two players.....

Re: 85million pounds spent on two players.....

Re: 85million pounds spent on two players.....

Re: 85million pounds spent on two players.....

Re: 85million pounds spent on two players.....

Re: 85million pounds spent on two players.....