Do Enrique and Coloccini deserve to start for thier respective national teams?

I personally feel Coloccini is better than if not every Argentine CB if not he atleast deserves to be 1 of the 2 CB's and Enrique for damn sure deserves to be Spain's first choice LB and he would be imo if he played for Barca or Madrid.

Thoughts?

Coloccini would be boss for Argentina, given how bad their CBs are. He commands the line, and can compete in the air.

Not sure about Jose, he is a very good LB in both attacking and defending. He could start. What's guaranteed here is that he'll give Monreal, and Arbeloa one hell of a fight for that spot.

Arbeloa > Jose > Moreal imo.

RedEyesWhiteBeard wrote:yes i agree they are very good. amazing how much colo has improved.

I dont think he has technically improved, he has just realised and adjusted to the fact that in England you cant day dream on the ball he has always had the ability, i think Tiote infront of him has helped him immensely as well.

I just dont undertand why these two are considered for their national teams, the only reason i can think of is they play for a mid table side( Well Enrique has just moved) otherwise i dont see a reason not to call them up.

@ Danny

Jose is better than Arbeloa imo both defensively and offensively and has a better cross aswell.

I always though Coloccini was Italian lol

Capdevilla is standard, he is not spectacular, but you can trust him.

(we should replace Maxwell with him)