2014/15 Winter Transfer Rumours

junkyard wrote:Balotelli to Juventus in this January?

tbh I don't believe in these rumours.
Some rumours were born because Raiola was seen in Torino ... but it is because he is also Mxit'aryan 's agent, a Juve target

Inter Milan are trying to sign Atletico Madrid midfielder Mario Suarez, according to Tuttosport.

We instantly refused Balotelli, he was offered yeah.
Raiola was 2 days in a row in Vinovo it seems its about Mkhitaryan.

According to rumors in the media Jovetic is step away from Juve

DeviAngel wrote:We instantly refused Balotelli, he was offered yeah.
Raiola was 2 days in a row in Vinovo it seems its about Mkhitaryan.

According to rumors in the media Jovetic is step away from Juve

Jovetic!!! But he has been playing regularly in recent games. I thought it's Dzeko who will be sold.

Yohan Modric wrote:Inter Milan are trying to sign Atletico Madrid midfielder Mario Suarez, according to Tuttosport.

Not only Tuttosport, all report it , even Di Marzio

How much is he good ? Better or worse than Leiva ? I don't know him

Directly by Di Marzio's trasmission

Milan wants to sign Siqueira ( Atletico Madrid)
Fiorentina wants to sell Mario Gomez
Juventus wanted Jovetic on loan but City said not. But it can be a chance for summer
Inter did 2 bids for Mario Suarez , but Atletico looks for a replacement
Eto'o is very close to Sampdoria

"Milan wants to sign Siqueira"

He is terrible

-----------

Mario Suarez is a very good utility player. Hard working and gritty.

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/B7Lt-nYIcAA6VwI.jpg

What big name player isn't like to United?

And again, lol at thinking Messi is leaving any time soon

destro swap with ses

Guardian know we the only ones who could pony up the cash and still be good in FFP

but it's nothing more then click bait

Lupi wrote:destro swap with ses

Cant say for sure as of now who would be 'benefiting' more from the swap.
Maybe Roma have the edge here but SES has been irrelevant for two yrs now,though.
I think Destro can become a good player when played regularly rather than having to compete with a 38 yr old who calls all the shots at the club.

Also this means Dostoevsky's wet dream could become reality but at the expense of losing SES unfortunately for him.

Whilst I would like Destro, it would be far from a dream if he arrived at the expense of El Shaarawy. There are many other central forwards I'd be satisfied to take in his stead and for whom we would not have to sacrifice another important player. Destro is a player who relies heavily on the service of others, it makes little sense to cast aside one of our most important players creatively in the final third.

Maybe thats the only way you can afford Destro(or any other CF for that matter).From what i'm reading its your management that has come forward and proposed the swap rather than the other way round.

I rather have inzaghi as a player instead

S wrote:Maybe thats the only way you can afford Destro(or any other CF for that matter).From what i'm reading its your management that has come forward and proposed the swap rather than the other way round.

Unless it's escaped your notice, our management is populated by short sighted, panicked fools. Even during the past few seasons where we've spoken of cut backs we've had plenty of funds available but they've been squandered on numerous poor deals.

I do think we'll end up getting a centre forward without sacrificing SES though but perhaps not until the summer.

Menez and Cerci are much more useful than a physically and mentally damaged SES anyway

Menez will just refuse to pass to any competition for his spot in the centre.

There is no 'we' in team tbh

As for creativity,Cerci is certainly more creative than SES.Or atleast his crossing is on point.Maybe he can get to forge a partnership with Destro like how he managed to do with Immobile.Both are similar profile of strikers anyway.

S wrote:As for creativity,Cerci is certainly more creative than SES.Or atleast his crossing is on point.Maybe he can get to forge a partnership with Destro like how he managed to do with Immobile.Both are similar profile of strikers anyway.

Seems you've been watching cricket instead of Serie A for the last period.

Vibe wrote:

S wrote:As for creativity,Cerci is certainly more creative than SES.Or atleast his crossing is on point.Maybe he can get to forge a partnership with Destro like how he managed to do with Immobile.Both are similar profile of strikers anyway.

Seems you've been watching cricket instead of Serie A for the last period.

Well you're not wrong here definitely

But what was wrong in my post though ? I dont find SES to be an overly creative player.

S wrote:As for creativity,Cerci is certainly more creative than SES.Or atleast his crossing is on point.Maybe he can get to forge a partnership with Destro like how he managed to do with Immobile.Both are similar profile of strikers anyway.

Respectfully going to disagree. Cerci's no doubt been an effective player in the past but he's also benefited from playing in a counter attacking system in which he's been given few defensive responsibilities, operating essentially as a second striker with acres of space to play into. Finding a way through a deep lying defence who constrict space is an entirely different ball game however and Cerci's complete lack of a right foot and rather selfish tendency to over dribble hardly speaks well of his ability to create chances. I don't think he'd have trouble coexisting with Destro however he's hardly an elite provider.

S wrote:

Vibe wrote:

S wrote:As for creativity,Cerci is certainly more creative than SES.Or atleast his crossing is on point.Maybe he can get to forge a partnership with Destro like how he managed to do with Immobile.Both are similar profile of strikers anyway.

Seems you've been watching cricket instead of Serie A for the last period.

Well you're not wrong here definitely

But what was wrong in my post though ? I dont find SES to be an overly creative player.

Well first of all SES is far more complete than Cerci.Second,I don't even consider Cerci a striker,he's a winger or a wide forward.The fact he succeeded in Torino essentially playing as a SS is more due to Ventura's system in place rather than him being a striker as mentioned above.He's clearly been found out at Atletico for it.

I've also never found SES to be an Ozil in terms of creating,but he has vision which is obvious,while I consider Cerci a player who hold his head down and looks at the ball more rather than searching for teammates.He can find a pass here and there while running at a panicked defense but make something out of nothing?Hardly.

As for Cerci himself,I rate him.If utilized properly he can be an asset for Milan.Right wing of a 4-3-3 in Serie A and Cerci are a match made in heaven.

Cerci seemed like a poacher to me the few times i saw him tbh... but i haven't seen him much.

S wrote:

Lupi wrote:destro swap with ses

Maybe Roma have the edge here but SES has been irrelevant for two yrs now.

Two years is a stretch, besides he's been injured for the large majority of time he's been "irrelevant".

Also you shouldn't underestimate the power of good coaching tbh. Milan have had scrubs in charge almost his entire career as a footballer.