Is extra-time a good thing?

Problem is if you take away players, then a team that already lost one player is even more disadvantaged. I mean, the more players are taken away, the more it feels if you have one guy less than the opponent. In a 10 vs 11, the disadvantage weighs 9%, if there are less players, it weighs more and more.

I don't think the fact the system further disadvantages the team that has lost a man to a red card as a negative consequence of the system though.

Firstly, in theory they deserve to be disadvantaged, it doesn't widen that disadvantage unreasonably.. Although I agree that it does.

Secondly, if anything it means the side who is down a man should be pushing hard to attack when it is 9v10 and kill the game off in the first half of ET.. before it gets to 8v9.

It's a test of depth,