Re: Chelsea Vs Paris Saint-Germain

by El Chelsea Fuerte Wed Apr 09, 2014 11:33 pm

Robespierre wrote:
El Chelsea Fuerte wrote:
Arquitescu wrote:
Nope.

Paris really did blow it and the Godly diety José had less to do with it than you think.

excuse me but jose is God. You can go away now

your same religion mate , we have to go on a pilgrimage in Setubal

by El Chelsea Fuerte Wed Apr 09, 2014 11:35 pm

Lex wrote:
El Chelsea Fuerte wrote:
Se7en wrote:

I'm pretty sure Porto didn't cost much at all to assemble.

That's the thing with Mou, he has proven himself with a squad that costs nothing and proven himself in a squad that costs everything.

Besides, psychology 101 tells you that spending alot of money doesn't help as much as you think. Just look at Real Madrid and you will clearly see that the root of all evil (money) has clearly gotten way over their heads, squad full of divas and the team would have been a million times better if their pay checks weren't so high.

ffs just leave Lex alone you know why hes bitter
Not bitter, just amused that Porto is Chelsea and Mou fan's safety net when the topic of Mou's success due to being involved with teams that have literal billions to spend comes up

keep digging but its just going to get worse

by Lex Wed Apr 09, 2014 11:40 pm

He deed it.......with Porto

He deed it........for Porto

Chelsea Vs Paris Saint-Germain - Page 7 Rikishi

by El Chelsea Fuerte Wed Apr 09, 2014 11:42 pm

Lex wrote:He deed it.......with Porto

He deed it........for Porto

and also with chelsea, inter, madrid...oh yh sorry those dont count because of da $$$!!!11!

by Shed Wed Apr 09, 2014 11:51 pm

Lex wrote:
El Chelsea Fuerte wrote:
Se7en wrote:

I'm pretty sure Porto didn't cost much at all to assemble.

That's the thing with Mou, he has proven himself with a squad that costs nothing and proven himself in a squad that costs everything.

Besides, psychology 101 tells you that spending alot of money doesn't help as much as you think. Just look at Real Madrid and you will clearly see that the root of all evil (money) has clearly gotten way over their heads, squad full of divas and the team would have been a million times better if their pay checks weren't so high.

ffs just leave Lex alone you know why hes bitter
Not bitter, just amused that Porto is Chelsea and Mou fan's safety net when the topic of Mou's success due to being involved with teams that have literal billions to spend comes up

He's still, he's still Maureen from the block

You're right. I mean, how stupid for anyone to use as a defence against your contention he could never accomplish something, a scenario where...he did.

Ludicrous on their part, really.

by Lex Wed Apr 09, 2014 11:56 pm

I never said they don't count because of the money. But don't try and act like Mou led Wrexham, Xerez and Perugia to glory, either. The teams Mou took over were already successful teams, all he had to do was spend the near limitless money that was available to him, buying the best players and utilizing them to the best of their abilities which, when you have players like Cronaldo, Drogba, prime Sneijder, prime Micon etc, is quite a lot of ability

by Arquitecto Wed Apr 09, 2014 11:57 pm

I find Mourinho's Inter win far more impressive considering the teams he faced were quite weak during that time and the product of many shock upsets that cleared way for weaker teams in contention.

Not that he didn't deserve it yet people tend to forget that facing a weak Real Madrid in the group, the worst United of the decade, an in decline Lyon and an overachieving La Coruña all underdogs to them considering the pre-Euro strength of Portugal as a whole. Won't even start on that Monaco.

by Lex Wed Apr 09, 2014 11:59 pm

Shed wrote:
Lex wrote:
El Chelsea Fuerte wrote:

ffs just leave Lex alone you know why hes bitter
Not bitter, just amused that Porto is Chelsea and Mou fan's safety net when the topic of Mou's success due to being involved with teams that have literal billions to spend comes up

He's still, he's still Maureen from the block

You're right. I mean, how stupid for anyone to use as a defence against your contention he could never accomplish something, a scenario where...he did.

Ludicrous on their part, really.

Once

Once and people go on about his prowess of getting teams to semi finals and whatnot like he does it with scrubs every year

by Shed Thu Apr 10, 2014 12:03 am

You seem surprised that the best managers get given the best jobs.

by Blue Barrett Thu Apr 10, 2014 12:33 am

Lex wrote:
Shed wrote:
Lex wrote:
Not bitter, just amused that Porto is Chelsea and Mou fan's safety net when the topic of Mou's success due to being involved with teams that have literal billions to spend comes up

He's still, he's still Maureen from the block

You're right. I mean, how stupid for anyone to use as a defence against your contention he could never accomplish something, a scenario where...he did.

Ludicrous on their part, really.

Once :lol:Once and people go on about his prowess of getting teams to semi finals and whatnot like he does it with scrubs every year

And why exactly does he have to do it with shit teams? Has Pep ever had any success with shit teams? Has Carlo ever had any success with shit teams? So he has to take the West Brom job and win the league with their players before he'll be seen as a top manager in your eyes? Ah well, okay. Wenger da best.

by El Chelsea Fuerte Thu Apr 10, 2014 2:28 am

Lex wrote:
Shed wrote:
Lex wrote:
Not bitter, just amused that Porto is Chelsea and Mou fan's safety net when the topic of Mou's success due to being involved with teams that have literal billions to spend comes up

He's still, he's still Maureen from the block

You're right. I mean, how stupid for anyone to use as a defence against your contention he could never accomplish something, a scenario where...he did.

Ludicrous on their part, really.

Once

one time is enough to prove your point that mou only does it with money is wrong. Go away now troll

by Sponsored content