I hope hazard flops

I hope he does well at Chelsea.

Mr Nick09 wrote:

Raptorgunner wrote:LOL at those thinking we Arsenal fans are butthurt about Hazard. Ask any Arsenal fan we dont want him at Arsenal, there was a time last year we did, but now all we want the GOTze.

kind of the same situation no? impossible targets?

We have 3 German players now at Arsenal, I am sure in a year or 2 if make a good bid we can bring him to Arsenal.

I am sure you all know we have the money, it all comes down to Wenger stop being stubborn and spend it.

We have 2 of the richest owners in football.

animal.crackers wrote:I hope he does well at Chelsea.

But we all know he has signed with City.

Raptorgunner wrote:LOL at those thinking we Arsenal fans are butthurt about Hazard. Ask any Arsenal fan we dont want him at Arsenal, there was a time last year we did, but now all we want the GOTze.

You aint signing Goatze bro.....

LMAO!

Buthurt Gooners!

I very much doubt he will flop. The kid is going to be a world beater.

Raptorgunner wrote:

Mr Nick09 wrote:

Raptorgunner wrote:LOL at those thinking we Arsenal fans are butthurt about Hazard. Ask any Arsenal fan we dont want him at Arsenal, there was a time last year we did, but now all we want the GOTze.

kind of the same situation no? impossible targets?

We have 3 German players now at Arsenal, I am sure in a year or 2 if make a good bid we can bring him to Arsenal.

I am sure you all know we have the money, it all comes down to Wenger stop being stubborn and spend it.

We have 2 of the richest owners in football.

Arsenal offering 30+m for Goetze...

Great Leader Sprucenuce wrote:

Raptorgunner wrote:LOL at those thinking we Arsenal fans are butthurt about Hazard. Ask any Arsenal fan we dont want him at Arsenal, there was a time last year we did, but now all we want the GOTze.

You aint signing Goatze bro.....

There is always other players we can sign.

Chelsea could actually be remotely pleasing to the neutral's eye. Unless, of course, talks break down between Lillie and Chelsea which is a realistic thing...

You could'nt afford Ben Arfa brah, you should have got him when you had the chance....

You know like we did when we took him from L'OM for 2m

LOL at Chelsea fans making fun of Arsenal, like really? Where were any of you when you guys were doing crap in the season? All your good for is to sign up and talk big talk when you actually do something right, freaking plastic fans.

Josh's comment was really uncalled for, but that's what this forum has gotten to. Smh

we couldnt buy ben arfa anyways, unless wenger could settle the diaby - ben arfa beef



Chelsea is going to be all Belgians and Brazilians pretty soon btw.

Barrettinator wrote:

Neutral wrote:

Barrettinator wrote:

Neutral wrote:

teamanarchy wrote:Depends on where he goes.
I don't think he'd suit Chelsea's system (where he's likely going). They are a hard, physical, disciplined team... at least if Di Matteo is coach...
Arsenal on the other hand would suit him ideally, but I doubt he's going there...
The premier league itself might be suitable for him, but it's hard to tell. One can be relatively certain, however, that he will not be performing against Stoke...

fkn andy gray seriously. even the worse are the idiots who listen to him. stoke are a horrible team. good players don't need to prove anything against them.

i wanted to him to fail if he went to city or chelsea because i felt he'd go for the money and that united or arsenal would be better for him footballing wise. two teams that need him more. but i hope he does well wherever he goes as i like players of small build doing well in the epl to shut the permfaces up.

So how do you figure Chelsea do not need him?

said a few days ago he wants to play in his preferred position. as a true no.10. which mata currently occupies.

He said he PREFERS to play there. Not that he MUST play there. You can make a case for United but do you really think any star player wants to join Arsenal these days? Think again, mate.

youre confusing want with prefer. he said WANTS to play in his preferred position. not that he PREFERS to go to a club where he can go top play his preferred position.

anyway looks like he prefers abromivich's money. he keeps changing his mind.

Mr Nick09 wrote:Arsenal offering 30+m for Goetze...

so true

Its a done deal.

Eden Hazard to join Chelsea in £35 million deal
Chelsea will pay a fee of around €40 million (£35.3 million) to Lille, with Hazard having demanded wages of £4.6 million a year net of tax, so around £9  million a year for his new employer. That averages out at £170,000 a week.

In addition his agent, John Bico, who has conducted an aggressive auction has made it clear that he wants a fee of £6 million.

If all the demands are met and with Hazard expected to agree a five-year deal, it means the overall cost of the signing, fees and contract will amount to around £78 million which, even by Chelsea standards, is a substantial investment.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/sport/football/teams/chelsea/9295242/Eden-Hazard-to-join-Chelsea-in-35-million-deal.html

Ali"The Superman"8775 wrote:LOL at Chelsea fans making fun of Arsenal, like really? Where were any of you when you guys were doing crap in the season? All your good for is to sign up and talk big talk when you actually do something right, freaking plastic fans.

Josh's comment was really uncalled for, but that's what this forum has gotten to. Smh

I joined this forum when we were deep in shit this past season and have been a consistent poster since. Stop grasping at straws.

all chelsea fans were here when they were "shet"

except gil lol

Zinedine Zidane about Hazard

"Faster than Zidane, more technique than Thierry Henry."

Raptorgunner wrote:Its a done deal.

Eden Hazard to join Chelsea in £35 million deal
Chelsea will pay a fee of around €40 million (£35.3 million) to Lille, with Hazard having demanded wages of £4.6 million a year net of tax, so around £9  million a year for his new employer. That averages out at £170,000 a week.

In addition his agent, John Bico, who has conducted an aggressive auction has made it clear that he wants a fee of £6 million.

If all the demands are met and with Hazard expected to agree a five-year deal, it means the overall cost of the signing, fees and contract will amount to around £78 million which, even by Chelsea standards, is a substantial investment.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/sport/football/teams/chelsea/9295242/Eden-Hazard-to-join-Chelsea-in-35-million-deal.html

LOL its £100k, not £170k. Some of these journalists just like to toy with the wages of players. You'd find another saying £190k tomorrow . They said Mata was on £100k when he's actually on £55k .

Ganso wrote:all chelsea fans were here when they were "shet"

except gil lol

Where's English_Jewel? Infinity whats his name?

Like I need to clutch at straws lol , you are a PLASTIC fan, that's all I need to say. What are you going to do? Throw 8 years of history in my face?

Barrettinator wrote:

Raptorgunner wrote:Its a done deal.

Eden Hazard to join Chelsea in £35 million deal
Chelsea will pay a fee of around €40 million (£35.3 million) to Lille, with Hazard having demanded wages of £4.6 million a year net of tax, so around £9  million a year for his new employer. That averages out at £170,000 a week.

In addition his agent, John Bico, who has conducted an aggressive auction has made it clear that he wants a fee of £6 million.

If all the demands are met and with Hazard expected to agree a five-year deal, it means the overall cost of the signing, fees and contract will amount to around £78 million which, even by Chelsea standards, is a substantial investment.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/sport/football/teams/chelsea/9295242/Eden-Hazard-to-join-Chelsea-in-35-million-deal.html

LOL its £100k, not £170k. Some of these journalists just like to toy with the wages of players. You'd find another saying £190k tomorrow . They said Mata was on £100k when he's actually on £55k .

Mata on 55k? this has to be a joke, no way this is true.

100k a week thats it? another joke.

Why the *bleep* would want a player to flop?

Barrettinator wrote:

Raptorgunner wrote:Its a done deal.

Eden Hazard to join Chelsea in £35 million deal
Chelsea will pay a fee of around €40 million (£35.3 million) to Lille, with Hazard having demanded wages of £4.6 million a year net of tax, so around £9  million a year for his new employer. That averages out at £170,000 a week.

In addition his agent, John Bico, who has conducted an aggressive auction has made it clear that he wants a fee of £6 million.

If all the demands are met and with Hazard expected to agree a five-year deal, it means the overall cost of the signing, fees and contract will amount to around £78 million which, even by Chelsea standards, is a substantial investment.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/sport/football/teams/chelsea/9295242/Eden-Hazard-to-join-Chelsea-in-35-million-deal.html

LOL its £100k, not £170k. Some of these journalists just like to toy with the wages of players. You'd find another saying £190k tomorrow . They said Mata was on when he's actually on £55k .

He is earning the £100k after tax.

the Guardian has the same value up, so maybe you are wrong?

United can't compete anymore on the market with Chelsea and City. That's what we learned. They are way more prestigious than both, but money has talked first.

Raptorgunner wrote:

Barrettinator wrote:

Raptorgunner wrote:Its a done deal.

Eden Hazard to join Chelsea in £35 million deal
Chelsea will pay a fee of around €40 million (£35.3 million) to Lille, with Hazard having demanded wages of £4.6 million a year net of tax, so around £9  million a year for his new employer. That averages out at £170,000 a week.

In addition his agent, John Bico, who has conducted an aggressive auction has made it clear that he wants a fee of £6 million.

If all the demands are met and with Hazard expected to agree a five-year deal, it means the overall cost of the signing, fees and contract will amount to around £78 million which, even by Chelsea standards, is a substantial investment.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/sport/football/teams/chelsea/9295242/Eden-Hazard-to-join-Chelsea-in-35-million-deal.html

LOL its £100k, not £170k. Some of these journalists just like to toy with the wages of players. You'd find another saying £190k tomorrow . They said Mata was on £100k when he's actually on £55k .

Mata on 55k? this has to be a joke, no way this is true.

100k a week thats it? another joke.

Why would it be? the Media are known for making up fees and wages to silly levels.

L'Equipe said its 110k and i believe them over any english paper and 110k while is a lot of money its not crazy in this day and age.

I mean Villa average 80k a week ffs lol.

animal.crackers wrote:Why the *bleep* would want a player to flop?

So do you wish all players go to United well?

OLpower wrote:United can't compete anymore on the market with Chelsea and City. That's what we learned. They are way more prestigious than both, but money has talked first.

That's because clubs like Chelsea and City are willing to do anything to sign some players, even offering them an insane amount of money.

I think United have stronger traditional principles, and they just wont pay that kind of money to anyone. It's more so a club stand if anything.