Zealous wrote:Loving this game of transfer day chicken everyone is playing

You're loving it ?

Its annoying as fck even for a neutral.

Sahin is putting Hazard to shame when it comes to transfer sagas

Sahin really isn't doing anything.He really doesn't have much say in negotiations.

Everyone around him is a circus act lol.

Surag wrote:

Zealous wrote:Loving this game of transfer day chicken everyone is playing

You're loving it ?

Its annoying as fck even for a neutral.

What can I say, I have exotic tastes.

Surag wrote:

Zealous wrote:Loving this game of transfer day chicken everyone is playing

You're loving it ?

Its annoying as fck even for a neutral.

As a neutral, I'm completely indifferent

The ultimate troll. Need a troll face type pic though

As it long it doesn't involve my club i couldn't care less lol.....

Just find the whole situation hilarious, which him stay and bench Alonso.

Sadly Mole ,Nuri Sahin's loan move has been kinda the 'big news of the day' for two weeks now and still a decision hasnt been reached.Its causing an unrest in me probably because of the 'extensive coverage' of the "Turkish Beckham's" high profile loan move

Beckham?

Le Samourai wrote:Beckham?

Catch the drift

poor man's neymar "saga"... literally, that was between barcelona and madrid, this between liverpool and arsenal

CBarca wrote:I'm annoyed by it.

Why would he reject Spurs and then go to Arsenal or Liverpool of all places

Thats the million dollar question, why pick Arsenal over SPurs.

Is it official yet???

Dear lord, how much longer is this going to go on for?

Mou, just add a buy-out clause to Sahin cause we all know he isn't coming back. Also, Spurs, tell Levy to stop pretending to be a master negotiator and sign M'Vila so that Madrid can spend loads of money on a player they don't need.

Honestly i dont know why even us and Arsenal fans are this much worried about his signing.

Yes Sahin is a better CM than anyone in either clubs but its not like both teams are in desperate need for a CM.Also he hardly played last season and injured half the time so its not like there is a guarentee he will replicate his Dortmund form.

Both of us well covered in that position in Wilshere and Allen who are long term investments whereas even if Sahin comes he will at best be short term solution.

He is at best a luxury signing which if happens great but if doesnt not that big deal for either Arsenal or Liverpool imo.Both teams have much more important positions to address in the squad in DM (Arsenal) and Striker (Liverpool).

Well if he's never coming back to Madrid, as they say....then it stands to reason that whoever he ends up joining may just en up buying him permanently at the end of the season anyway. This is providing he does enough earn such a move though, 50/50 whether he can do that in just one season.

Don't understand why Madrid didn't just put a buy-out clause in the deal or make this a loan-to-buy option a la Bojan to Roma.

That they didn't put such an option on the table hints that maybe, just maybe they have future plans for Sahin, possibly even after Mou leaves, since it's not like he doesn't have time on side at just 22.

The Ultimate Troll

Wenger refused to do the deal without a buy out clause. That was it, we didn't contact madrid since that talk. It's gone now

Wanyama M'Vila Danny Murphy

Brendan Rodgers has confirmed that Liverpool are close to signing midfielder Nuri Sahin.

Real Madrid are willing to send the Turkey international out on loan and he looked destined to link up with Liverpool's Premier League rivals, Arsenal, earlier this week.

But it is believed the Gunners wanted to make it a permanent move and the 23-year-old was only willing to leave the Bernabeu on loan.

Now Rodgers, who worked with Real boss Jose Mourinho at Chelsea, believes a deal is imminent for Sahin to go on loan to Anfield instead.

"Hopefully in the next 24 hours we will get some confirmation on that," said the Liverpool manager after his side's Europa League win at Hearts.

"It's quite far along. He's a very good footballer."

Liverpool supposedly playing £5m loan fee and £14m permanent fee on top of 100k wage.

Not worth it for Arsenal

Probably more accurate to say that Arsenal wasn't prepared to pay that much.

He'll leave them for a bigger club if they finish outside the top 4.

Legend wrote:Liverpool supposedly playing £5m loan fee and £14m permanent fee on top of 100k wage.

Not worth it for Arsenal

Struggling for Cash Restricted by the Budget Another midfielder when need a striker Trying to cut down the wage bill

100% possession and 0 goals

Already made a bet with Sep on Sahin not coming to Liverpool. This transfer saga has already stretched beyond its tolerable elasticity. It needs to end otherwise we have some more aggravating than the Fabregas Saga.

He will stay at Madrid.