Both Richarlison and Pickford should be banned for 3 games minimum.

Scum team

merseyside derby, allow it

liverpool stealing it in injury team for the 20th time in the last 2 seasons ffs

Pickford is so bad. Imagine spending £32m on this guy.

Lmao one of the most overrated keepers in the league. Everton should get rid and buy Dean Henderson

VAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAR

YOU LOVE TO SEE IT

Christ, the offside rule is terrible in the VAR era.

Bring on Wenger's new rule.

The offside rule needs to be amended

This is terrible

LOOOOL

VAR has ruined football

The technology is fine. Its the rules and the people behind the camera ruining it. #WengerIn

I think it's offside. Camera angle vs parallax error. VAR will probably explain the reason since they have a lot of explanations to give post this game.

Nishankly wrote:I think it's offside. Camera angle vs parallax error. VAR will probably explain the reason since they have a lot of explanations to give post this game.

It's an offside according to the rules, sure. Noone disputes it.

It's just not in the spirit of the original rules to decide games on something like this.

Offside is made to prevent cherry picking and getting a head start on an opponent. A difference in less than a cm that can't be seen by the human eye shouldn't be offside.

proud of Everton, they actually stood up to the challenge this time

M99 wrote:The technology is fine. Its the rules and the people behind the camera ruining it. #WengerIn

Re:

Clarification on Pickford/Van Dijk.... we all get one wrong now and then.

Pickford could have been sent off (probably should have been).

Had it confirmed that the VAR, David Coote, did NOT check for a red card. Appears he was too concerned with the offside. #EVELIV

— Dale Johnson (@DaleJohnsonESPN) October 17, 2020

lmfao too much work for him to focus on two things.

Freeza wrote:

Nishankly wrote:I think it's offside. Camera angle vs parallax error. VAR will probably explain the reason since they have a lot of explanations to give post this game.

It's an offside according to the rules, sure. Noone disputes it.

It's just not in the spirit of the original rules to decide games on something like this.

Offside is made to prevent cherry picking and getting a head start on an opponent. A difference in less than a cm that can't be seen by the human eye shouldn't be offside.

bullshit, this is what we brought VAR in for
it's offside or not, it's either a goal or not, no fucking around

^^^

El Gunner wrote:

Freeza wrote:

Nishankly wrote:I think it's offside. Camera angle vs parallax error. VAR will probably explain the reason since they have a lot of explanations to give post this game.

It's an offside according to the rules, sure. Noone disputes it.

It's just not in the spirit of the original rules to decide games on something like this.

Offside is made to prevent cherry picking and getting a head start on an opponent. A difference in less than a cm that can't be seen by the human eye shouldn't be offside.

bullshit, this is what we brought VAR in for
it's offside or not, it's either a goal or not, no fucking around

the day of the "we need global Stalin communism" is made....

I bet you'll be swimming in whiskey tonight in joy even if your second team loses 10-0 vs. City later today.

Congrats mate

remember all those bullshit calls Liverpool got last season due to VAR or lack of VAR, yup, karma is a bitch and it's either a 10 or slobby fat nympho, no in-between

El Gunner wrote:remember all those bullshit calls Liverpool got last season due to VAR or lack of VAR, yup, karma is a bitch and it's either a 10 or slobby fat nympho, no in-between

LOL, go read the table of how VAR impacted team's points last season...stop embarrassing yourself global Stalin communism.

I hope for your sanity, one day your second team becomes relevant again, so you'll stop obsessing.

your LDS (Liverpool Derangement Syndome) is akin those people who reply to every Trump tweet 1second after he posts with memes of "DRUMPFFFFF!!!!!!" "PUPPEEEEETTTT" etc.

I'll pray for you at the mosque tomorrow. May Allah help you in your endeavours.

El Gunner wrote:

Freeza wrote:

Nishankly wrote:I think it's offside. Camera angle vs parallax error. VAR will probably explain the reason since they have a lot of explanations to give post this game.

It's an offside according to the rules, sure. Noone disputes it.

It's just not in the spirit of the original rules to decide games on something like this.

Offside is made to prevent cherry picking and getting a head start on an opponent. A difference in less than a cm that can't be seen by the human eye shouldn't be offside.

bullshit, this is what we brought VAR in for
it's offside or not, it's either a goal or not, no fucking around

lmao you are 1 year late in realizing this EG

Nishankly wrote:Don't even care Helmer. The major problem is that even when VAR is given against us, we still end up winning so it never makes any posts.

Let's hope after a VAR/ref decision we finally end up losing or at the very least drawing so that people can finally sleep at night so that they equal that to their agendas.

Happy for EG XD

LDS is real folks, wew. Full form today.

Ancelotti has created the best Everton I've seen since prime Moyes. Better even.

i really wanted to see the everton liverpool game, it was an early game for america lol

Man Kepa is awful