Loic Remy

by Abramovich Wed Dec 10, 2014 9:38 pm

Can't find the original thread with the Liverpool medical stuff, but how silly do Liverfools look now?

What a bargain of a squad and versatile player, not playing amazing or anything but definitely doing a role.

Signing scrubs like Balotelli instead, SMH he is probably loving it that Liverpool are so bad now Thumbs up

.

by Great Leader Sprucenuce Wed Dec 10, 2014 9:43 pm

I wouldn't expect him to do amazing considering how low his minutes is tbf.

He showed last season how good he is, this shouldn't be a surprise.

by farfan Wed Dec 10, 2014 9:45 pm

i don't think he's in a position to enjoy anybody's predicament .

he's like third choice now .

by windkick Wed Dec 10, 2014 10:00 pm

i agree pools medical staff should of taken a chance

by mr-r34 Thu Dec 11, 2014 12:28 am

Lets just cancel medicals, *bleep* it risk it all the time and stop being Liverfools.

by Shed Thu Dec 11, 2014 12:32 am

mr-r34 wrote:Lets just cancel medicals, *bleep* it risk it all the time and stop being Liverfools.

Well he passed a medical for QPR, and he passed a medical for Newcastle, and he passed a medical for Chelsea, only failing one at Liverpool.

So is it more logical to believe the problem is with him, or with your medical department?

by mr-r34 Thu Dec 11, 2014 3:33 am

Shed wrote:
mr-r34 wrote:Lets just cancel medicals, *bleep* it risk it all the time and stop being Liverfools.

Well he passed a medical for QPR, and he passed a medical for Newcastle, and he passed a medical for Chelsea, only failing one at Liverpool.

So is it more logical to believe the problem is with him, or with your medical department?

The problem is with him, his got a well documented heart defect. We didn't want to take the risk, just because your departments are less risk-averse doesn't make ours a problem.

by Art Morte Thu Dec 11, 2014 6:05 am

Meh, I'm fine with us not signing him if our medical guys said it's a risk.

by Shed Thu Dec 11, 2014 6:20 am

mr-r34 wrote:
Shed wrote:
mr-r34 wrote:Lets just cancel medicals, *bleep* it risk it all the time and stop being Liverfools.

Well he passed a medical for QPR, and he passed a medical for Newcastle, and he passed a medical for Chelsea, only failing one at Liverpool.

So is it more logical to believe the problem is with him, or with your medical department?

The problem is with him, his got a well documented heart defect. We didn't want to take the risk, just because your departments are less risk-averse doesn't make ours a problem.

Playing the high-road card to prop up passing on a quality player who'd played 42 Premier League
-
matches prior without incident and whom no one else besides you found a single problem with in favour of signing absolutely useless ones rofl

-#riskaverse

by mr-r34 Thu Dec 11, 2014 8:40 am

I would but i CBF.

by Red Alert Thu Dec 11, 2014 9:29 am

“It can't be a medical reason because he (Rémy) never failed a medical, I just can’t believe what I’ve read and heard,” said Redknapp.

He has a big mouth, but also talks a lot of shite so who knows.

Think we pulled out for other reasons though. Probably wages. He's close to 6 digits a year, no? Offering that over 5 years was a massive risk. But then again, knowing Liverpool Lambert's probably on those same wages so who knows. Laughing

by Great Leader Sprucenuce Thu Dec 11, 2014 10:46 am

Yes he does have a well documented heart defect but the key there is also that it doesn't actually stop him from playing.

It's been like that since his Nice days, it doesn't actually effect his ability to play football. Pretty much every doctor in his career has said that it's not something which needs to be of great concern.

by junkyard Thu Dec 11, 2014 2:28 pm

Art Morte wrote:Meh, I'm fine with us not signing him if our medical guys said it's a risk.

Balo was absolutely risk-free, I suppose! scratch

by Art Morte Thu Dec 11, 2014 4:09 pm

junkyard wrote:
Art Morte wrote:Meh, I'm fine with us not signing him if our medical guys said it's a risk.

Balo was absolutely risk-free, I suppose!

Not sure what you mean by that, if it is that Balotelli is injured right now, then I'll say that everyone get injured some time, but not everyone have some intrinsic condition that could end their career (like our doctors thought could happen with Remy, I guess).

by mr-r34 Thu Dec 11, 2014 9:50 pm

junkyard wrote:
Art Morte wrote:Meh, I'm fine with us not signing him if our medical guys said it's a risk.

Balo was absolutely risk-free, I suppose!

Medical risk vs Football risk, big difference.

by junkyard Sat Dec 13, 2014 4:15 pm

Art Morte wrote:
junkyard wrote:
Art Morte wrote:Meh, I'm fine with us not signing him if our medical guys said it's a risk.

Balo was absolutely risk-free, I suppose!

Not sure what you mean by that, if it is that Balotelli is injured right now, then I'll say that everyone get injured some time, but not everyone have some intrinsic condition that could end their career (like our doctors thought could happen with Remy, I guess).

I didn't mean the medical risk. Balo's history of creating problems in everywhere he goes is well documented. Football-wise Remy would have been more worthy taking the risk.

by sportsczy Sun Dec 14, 2014 6:06 pm

Not to mention Remy was available for free AND his demanded less wages than Balo Laughing

by Art Morte Sun Dec 14, 2014 6:38 pm

Art Morte wrote:Meh, I'm fine with us not signing him if our medical guys said it's a risk.

by Red Alert Mon Dec 15, 2014 6:57 am

sportsczy wrote:Not to mention Remy was available for free AND his demanded less wages than Balo

He was free now?

Reports stated Remy was coming for 80k over 5 years. That's A LOT more than what we gave Mario. Stop talking shit. lmao

by Sponsored content

Loic Remy

Loic Remy

Re: Loic Remy

Re: Loic Remy

Re: Loic Remy

Re: Loic Remy

Re: Loic Remy

Re: Loic Remy

Re: Loic Remy

Re: Loic Remy

Re: Loic Remy

Re: Loic Remy

Re: Loic Remy

Re: Loic Remy

Re: Loic Remy

Re: Loic Remy

Re: Loic Remy

Re: Loic Remy

Re: Loic Remy

Re: Loic Remy

Re: Loic Remy