Pandev: 'It's not my signature!'

Maybe someone in the Macedonian FA misplaced the original vote, but as they had to enter a vote, they simply let some secretary write a new one and faxed that?

Has FIFA made any statement about all that ??

Things are getting serious but nothing really surprising

juveman17 wrote:

Art Morte wrote:

Surag wrote:

Pandev's real signature is on the left of the image.The one on the right is the one under the vote.

If the pic is true then I don't know why on earth would FIFA have published that document with an obviously forged signature. A 12-year-old could realize it will be checked against his real signature. I think people are just wanting to see a conspiracy theory here while there isn't one.

So the Pandev is lying? Why would he do that?

Not that I care about this thing at all, but why is no one willing to question the signature picture in question? Someone just posts a picture like that on the Internet and people are ready to take it as it's genuine, just like that, no more "proof" needed.

Sometimes it makes me mentally facepalm how little people are interested in validity and reliability of stories nowadays. No one is asking for sources. Like that "Arab oil money is challenging the CL with their own tournament". Like this picture here. People are just ready to chew it as it's posted on the Internet. Bloody weird.

Surag wrote:

Pandev's real signature is on the left of the image.The one on the right is the one under the vote.

If you're going to forge someone's sig, shouldn't you do a half decent job at least This is disgraceful

Here's the doc released by FIFA morte... it's the sig Surag showed. It's just been cropped out to illustrate:

http://futbol.as.com/futbol/2013/03/22/internacional/1363948204_694219.html

This is getting really interesting

There's a website for collectors that show all the official signatures of athletes so you don't get screwed when you buy a signed jersey for example. Here's Pandev's:


FIFA

Why would FIFA publicly disclose a fake Pandev signature which they made up in order to rig the results ?

gondov wrote:Why would FIFA publicly disclose a fake Pandev signature which they made up in order to rig the results ?

That's the funny part.

rwo power wrote:Maybe someone in the Macedonian FA misplaced the original vote, but as they had to enter a vote, they simply let some secretary write a new one and faxed that?

I thought in similar way.

eelir wrote:

rwo power wrote:Maybe someone in the Macedonian FA misplaced the original vote, but as they had to enter a vote, they simply let some secretary write a new one and faxed that?

I thought in similar way.

Impossible, its obviously more likely that Blatter paid off someone in the mob to pay off a secretary to destroy Pandev's original vote, then when asked to type up a new one to send to FIFA, the secretary changed the vote to Del Bosque because Blatter wants him to win and Mou to lose because I don't know.

FIFA has a lot of significant, ugly corruption - the serious conspiracy theory regarding this story is making a mockery of that real problem because of its absurdity

Swanhends wrote:

eelir wrote:

rwo power wrote:Maybe someone in the Macedonian FA misplaced the original vote, but as they had to enter a vote, they simply let some secretary write a new one and faxed that?

I thought in similar way.

Impossible, its obviously more likely that Blatter paid off someone in the mob to pay off a secretary to destroy Pandev's original vote, then when asked to type up a new one to send to FIFA, the secretary changed the vote to Del Bosque because Blatter wants him to win and Mou to lose because I don't know.

FIFA has a lot of significant, ugly corruption - the serious conspiracy theory regarding this story is making a mockery of that real problem because of its absurdity

Did Mou miss out on the award by 1 vote or something?

No he missed out by 60 votes

That's not the point. You don't falsify one vote lol. if you make the decision to falsify, it's obviously in order to affect a result or else why bother. The question is whether others will step forward or will they let it go out of fear of FIFA.

sportsczy wrote:That's not the point. You don't falsify one vote lol. if you make the decision to falsify, it's obviously in order to affect a result or else why bother. The question is whether others will step forward or will they let it go out of fear of FIFA.

......assuming this whole thing is FIFA's fault not someone in the Macedonian FA.

sportsczy wrote:That's not the point. You don't falsify one vote lol. if you make the decision to falsify, it's obviously in order to affect a result or else why bother. The question is whether others will step forward or will they let it go out of fear of FIFA.

Name me one logical and reasonable motive for FIFA to sabotage this award.

Pandev seeking some attention

Pandev has always been a toady curry favouring apple polishing back scratching boot licking kiss ass to Mourinho who shouldn't exactly be the model of ethics given his questionable on & off field antics. FIFA would have little incentive to change SIXTY votes in favour of Del Bosque.

I'm glad the superior manager took the higher road in not fuelling these petulant accusations based suffering after not being granted the award.

It's not like Del Bosque didn't deserve it either.

RealGunner wrote:Pandev seeking some attention

How dare he defend himself against those that seek to release falsified/incorrect information about him to the general public

wat a bastard he is!

:sarcasm: