How highly do you rate Romelu Lukaku?

free_cat wrote:Both Giroud and Ba are not very good.

Ba is better than Giroud though

free_cat wrote:Both Giroud and Ba are not very good.

barcelona would bite off hands and turn on many sprinklers to snap up either

Lex wrote:

free_cat wrote:Both Giroud and Ba are not very good.

barcelona would bite off hands and turn on many sprinklers to snap up either

Ahh yeah, you're right, see Messi isn't any good.

Barcelona's 0-10-0 formation isn't ideal for long term success

Lex wrote:Barcelona's 0-10-0 formation isn't ideal for long term success

Isn't 5 years a long term success ?

Lukaku to be the reason for Torres' exit : (

Lukaku would be foolish to return to Chelsea next year if Mourinho arrives.

Giggity5313 wrote: barca have won 2CL's in the past 5 years

not ideal my ass

That was with a world class Eto'o and a pre broken leg Villa. A de-motivated, 31 year old Villa doesn't cut the mustard anymore, while scrubs like Tello, Alexis and Pedro are utter dross

Back on topic

Lukaku would indeed be mad to go back to Chelsea. Wouldn't get nowhere near the same amount of playing time and would be under pressure to play in big stake games. Should either look for another season loan, or a transfer to another PL club

If Lukaku doesnt make it at Chelsea next season, hell never make it there.

Lol at Ba and Giroud comparisons.

Giroud is miles better than Ba lol and,this is coming from someone who isn't really a fan of him (Giroud) to begin with.

As for Lukaku just watched the United game and he's still a shit footballer with incredible athleticsm that scores goals. A player that raw scoring 17 goals in his debut season at the age of just 19 is unheard of. Another loan to a club that plays to his weaknesses could do him wonders to be honest.

Would love to see how he would adapt in that sort of situation.

Must be a frightening task as a defender to face someone with that physique, speed, agility and dribbling ability.

Gil wrote:Giroud is miles better than Ba lol

Not sure if serious

Bénin wrote:

Gil wrote:Giroud is miles better than Ba lol

Not sure if serious

Not sure if serious

How is Giroud not better than Ba?

Ba is a good solid striker yet Giroud is in what would call, superior.

Not much to expand on this, really.

Giroud would look just as bad at Chelsea as Ba does as would any poacher/target man.

Chelsea are weird they buy a team built for slow build up yet buy strikers built for counter attack and direct play.

First Torres then Ba .... i wonder who will be next.

Ba's true ability isn't on show at Chelsea because of how they play and wouldn't for Giroud either so its a bit of a silly comparison.

The way he utterly bullied Vidic tonight and made him cry was worth the price of admission alone

Whoever buys him from Chelsea will have a real monster on their hands

This thread btw

danyjr wrote:

Lex wrote:Had a gem amongst them all along, so they loaned him out and went and spunked a giant load on Ba

Chewsea

Funny because Arsenal spent more on Giroud. And I don't need to say who's better between Giroud and Ba  

Great Leader Sprucenuce wrote:Giroud would look just as bad at Chelsea as Ba does as would any poacher/target man.

Chelsea are weird they buy a team built for slow build up yet buy strikers built for counter attack and direct play.

First Torres then Ba .... i wonder who will be next.

Ba's true ability isn't on show at Chelsea because of how they play and wouldn't for Giroud either so its a bit of a silly comparison.

Chelsea's policy in the recents years was to get rid of their average players and bring in young players. They did well but they just forget to decide what style they wanted to play . Now they have plenty of young players being ostraz.

Lex wrote:Whoever buys him from Chelsea will have a real monster on their hands

Fek off, the club isn't THAT stupid...........I hope

Lex wrote:This thread btw

danyjr wrote:

Lex wrote:Had a gem amongst them all along, so they loaned him out and went and spunked a giant load on Ba

Chewsea

Funny because Arsenal spent more on Giroud. And I don't need to say who's better between Giroud and Ba  

Form is temporary. Class is permanent.

We'll talk about this soon, fam

I really like Giroud but Lukaku > Giroud for me, as Lex said if Chelsea doesn't keep him than they are to stupid

lol i'm a gigantic fan of Lukaku (and hope we snag him in the summer) but he's better than Giroud at nothing except physical strength and speed

Lex wrote:lol i'm a gigantic fan of Lukaku (and hope we snag him in the summer) but he's better than Giroud at nothing except physical strength and speed

HE's 21 ehreas Giroud is 27. Nothing to do with age of course but Lukaku is exactly the type of player Arsene likes. Young, room to improve ...

I don't understand why people are desperate to use him as a stick to beat us with. He's still our player lol.

This isn't a Pogba or Ravel Morrison type situation.

Even if we decide to *bleep* him off in odd fashion we'll still recoup about £40m in transfer fee.

Can't wait for his return so we can finally rid ourselves of that mental midget Torres. It's been 3 years too long with him.

He doesn't have the technical ability or brain to play for Arsenal.

Absolute monster of a player but compared to say Drogba he's a bit of a headless chicken.

With that said though; his pace, strength and ability to get into goalscoring positions means he's still going to be a handful every single week.