How highly do you rate Romelu Lukaku?

Utter monster

When Chelsea sell him in the summer

Great Leader Sprucenuce wrote:When Chelsea sell him in the summer

Dat jealously.

The Lukaku era begins this summer breh.

Nah i'm fully with you on that, i just doubt it will be at Chelsea is all

Torres = flop, Ba = short term = Lukaku at Chelsea.

if sturidge couldnt handle it at chelsea how does lukaku have a chance?

Yohan Modric wrote:Torres = flop, Ba = short term = Lukaku at Chelsea.

You really don't think Chelsea will buy a big name star?

Torres and Ba would still be above him based on wages anyway.

Seen this all before i really doubt he will be at Chelsea long term.

Great Leader Sprucenuce wrote:

Yohan Modric wrote:Torres = flop, Ba = short term = Lukaku at Chelsea.

You really don't think Chelsea will buy a big name star?

Torres and Ba would still be above him based on wages anyway.

Seen this all before i really doubt he will be at Chelsea long term.

Long term project brudda, Lukaku, Kevin, Courtois, Kalas etc etc all part of the project

Always hearing from Pool fans how Agger is world class, the Danish Beckenbauer etc.

Lukaku made him look like a school boy playing his first game.

I have been critical of him in the past, he came with so much hype then didn't seem to do anything. But I have been very impressed in what I have seen of him this season.

Maybe Rafas replacement next season will give him a chance.

Hat Trick against United.

This kid raped us twice this season. I rate him very high.

How jammy are Chelsea? seriously. got Drogba mk 2 on their hands.

Ran our defence ragged when he came on. Although Buttner and Lindegaard helped him out a whole lot.

He's class. All the talk is about Benteke. He's better.

Had a gem amongst them all along, so they loaned him out and went and spunked a giant load on Ba

Chewsea

Lex wrote:Had a gem amongst them all along, so they loaned him out and went and spunked a giant load on Ba

Chewsea

Hows 6mil a giant load, it's worked out for the best anyways. Played massive amount of minutes without significant pressure of a CL team.

Absolute beast, wonder who'll take him on loan next season. Would love to see him at Dortmund but on a permanent deal.

urbaNRoots wrote:Absolute beast, wonder who'll take him on loan next season. Would love to see him at Dortmund but on a permanent deal.

I'd also love to see him at dortmund

Lex wrote:Had a gem amongst them all along, so they loaned him out and went and spunked a giant load on Ba

Chewsea

Funny because Arsenal spent more on Giroud. And I don't need to say who's better between Giroud and Ba

danyjr wrote:And I don't need to say who's better between Giroud and Ba

Enlighten us, o wise sage, i need a good larf

No need for that, if you already think Giroud is better than Ba I have nothing to say other than let's agree to disagree.

I'm genuinely interested to hear why you think Ba is better

RED wrote:How jammy are Chelsea? seriously. got Drogba mk 2 on their hands.

Ran our defence ragged when he came on. Although Buttner and Lindegaard helped him out a whole lot.

Like he will be at the club long enough to be a first teamer

Just like De Bruyne and Courtios he will be sold after being consistently loaned out.

Chelsea have no interest in developing these players but just use them for profits.

Lex wrote:I'm genuinely interested to hear why you think Ba is better

Well, Giroud is/was supposed to be a real aerial threat, whether that's been the case I'm not sure but overall I admit he's better in air than Ba and perhaps a better link-up player down the middle. Other than that, he falls short in other areas: his finishing, his speed and his overall on the ball technique, hence why he has to play in the middle while Ba is more versatile and can also play slightly wider too. One thing I dislike a lot about Giroud is his weaker foot which is almost as good as my grandma trying to hit a ball with her walking stick. While I admit I haven't watched Ba a lot of times, my feeling was that he was very ambidextrous and it is a quality I like a lot in strikers.

Both Giroud and Ba are not very good.

free_cat wrote:Both Giroud and Ba are not very good.

Ba is better than Giroud though