Re: Hazard ready to move

by DeviAngel Mon Oct 31, 2011 3:33 pm

Juve is after him to Smile

by Great Leader Sprucenuce Mon Oct 31, 2011 3:36 pm

DeviAngel wrote:Juve is after him to

Can you really afford him with all the financial loss?

Would be a great signing mind especially if you win the league this year which i hope you do Very Happy

by Vibe Mon Oct 31, 2011 3:44 pm

Immaculate_Mole wrote:
VibeTribe wrote:
Immaculate_Mole wrote:
VibeTribe wrote:
Immaculate_Mole wrote:Btw he wont go for for 50 million its usual media bs where they jack up the price and players go for alot less........

Sanchez is a prime example of this, supposedly Udinese wasnt going to sell for less than 50million but he went for 28m euros.

Didn't he actually go for 43?

You believe the BS article over the word other than the clubs in question?

it was 26 +10 in bonuses but until those bonuses are paid it is 26 and considering what those bonuses are its quite possible they will never be paid lol.....

Anyway the point is media brings up fees to attract attention and the end the players end up going for a much smaller fee.....

I bet he goes for less than 35.

Udinese official representative said Barca info is not correct and he went for 43...

Again it was BS id rather listen tot Pozzo(Udinese Owner) who said it was 26m plus 10m in installments if you seriously believe that BS i dont know what to say.....

Anything related to Goal.com is considered rubbish.....

I believe it...Never heard Pozzo say anything and I don't see why would the official club representative contradict the president.In fact,why would he even say that is Pozzo didn't want him to.So yeah,I believe it.Goal.com just copied the article from some other newspaper from what I remember...

by Serge Gnabry Mon Oct 31, 2011 3:52 pm

ManU should get him imo.
They are great but they lack that extra bit of creativity in the middle.

by Great Leader Sprucenuce Mon Oct 31, 2011 3:56 pm

VibeTribe wrote:
Immaculate_Mole wrote:
VibeTribe wrote:
Immaculate_Mole wrote:
VibeTribe wrote:
Immaculate_Mole wrote:Btw he wont go for for 50 million its usual media bs where they jack up the price and players go for alot less........

Sanchez is a prime example of this, supposedly Udinese wasnt going to sell for less than 50million but he went for 28m euros.

Didn't he actually go for 43?

You believe the BS article over the word other than the clubs in question?

it was 26 +10 in bonuses but until those bonuses are paid it is 26 and considering what those bonuses are its quite possible they will never be paid lol.....

Anyway the point is media brings up fees to attract attention and the end the players end up going for a much smaller fee.....

I bet he goes for less than 35.

Udinese official representative said Barca info is not correct and he went for 43...

Again it was BS id rather listen tot Pozzo(Udinese Owner) who said it was 26m plus 10m in installments if you seriously believe that BS i dont know what to say.....

Anything related to Goal.com is considered rubbish.....

I believe it...Never heard Pozzo say anything and I don't see why would the official club representative contradict the president.In fact,why would he even say that is Pozzo didn't want him to.So yeah,I believe it.Goal.com just copied the article from some other newspaper from what I remember...

I cant believe iam having to do this but yh.......

“The final price was €26m plus another €10m in variables," Pozzo told Ona FM.

"He only wanted to sign for Barcelona and because of that the negotiations were not easy.

"There were offers from England that were higher, a €45m one from Manchester City to be precise."

Happy?

by Vibe Mon Oct 31, 2011 3:58 pm

Catalan Radio :facepalm:

by Great Leader Sprucenuce Mon Oct 31, 2011 4:06 pm

VibeTribe wrote:Catalan Radio

Cope are the great source you are using, yet they are the same Cope that accused Barca of doping and the very same that Barca took to court......

:facepalm:

Keep going to Goal.com Vibe, iam sure you will find trustworthy sources there :facepalm:

by Vibe Mon Oct 31, 2011 4:10 pm

Immaculate_Mole wrote:
VibeTribe wrote:Catalan Radio

Cope are the great source you are using, yet they are the same Cope that accused Barca of doping and the very same that Barca took to court......

Keep going to Goal.com Vibe, iam sure you will find trustworthy sources there

Straying off mole...You claim you believe your claim cause it's based on a more believable source,and it's not.My claim is based on my logic,nothing else.Sarcasm is losers last resort...

by EarlyPrototype Mon Oct 31, 2011 4:13 pm

What I wanted to say has pretty much already been said.

I don't think Arsenal can compete financially just not Wengers thing to spend a lot on one player.

Real are after Neymar.

He just said he won't go PSG.

Bayern could get Reus and BVB won't sell Gotze to Bayern imo.

Chelsea seems most likely atm unless Real decide to get Hazard.

by Mr Nick09 Mon Oct 31, 2011 4:15 pm

Where did Hazard say he wont go to PSG?

by Great Leader Sprucenuce Mon Oct 31, 2011 4:16 pm

VibeTribe wrote:
Immaculate_Mole wrote:
VibeTribe wrote:Catalan Radio

Cope are the great source you are using, yet they are the same Cope that accused Barca of doping and the very same that Barca took to court......

Keep going to Goal.com Vibe, iam sure you will find trustworthy sources there

Straying off mole...You claim you believe your claim cause it's based on a more believable source,and it's not.My claim is based on my logic,nothing else.Sarcasm is losers last resort...

Not really Cope are not a reliable source when it regards Barcelona news, ok Ona FM isnt reliable is but i didnt realise that......

Barcelona official site is more reliable than Cope and Ona FM will ever be....

This official representive stuff is complete BS, its always used to creat a story which doesnt exist the same was used when we supposedly signed Gervinho " according to a official representive"

Its always used when they have no source to show....

Again i think i will believe Barcelona's official website over a Catalan radio( didnt realise this before) and an organisation that Barcelona have taken to court in the past over dope allegations Laughing

by Sushi Master Mon Oct 31, 2011 4:18 pm

Serge Gnabry wrote:ManU should get him imo.
They are great but they lack that extra bit of creativity in the middle.

Hazard isn't really an AM, though. He primarily plays on the wings. He creates a lot, sure, but not really by defense splitting passes or the type of player ManU need. ManU are already stocked on the wings.

by Doc Mon Oct 31, 2011 4:20 pm

I really don't think Lillie would be negotiating with Arsenal after the whole Park situation, not when the current president is still around.

by EarlyPrototype Mon Oct 31, 2011 4:20 pm

St_Nick09_of_Goal wrote:Where did Hazard say he wont go to PSG?

OP: "Paris is magical and I'm definitely attracted to the city. It's not for now though. I don't want to join another French team and strengthen one of Lille's rivals. That would be the wrong thing to do."

by fishball Mon Oct 31, 2011 4:56 pm

zizzle wrote:those who need him cant afford him, and those who can afford him dont need him

this post is so true. ooh im so sad Sad

by Lord Awesome Mon Oct 31, 2011 5:27 pm

I think it will be Juve or Liverpool.

Maybe Bayern can pull it off.

by arabprince Mon Oct 31, 2011 5:41 pm

Why do people say Arsenal can't afford him? I'm pretty sure that will be his destination.

by Guest Mon Oct 31, 2011 5:47 pm

Because it's not the transfer fee itself... wages at arsenal are about 2/3 to 3/4 of the elite clubs'. If they were to give Hazard 120k a week (that's what it would take), they would have to give raises to their entire team since he would be the highest paid player.

by Ganso Mon Oct 31, 2011 6:15 pm

i would put my money on him moving to chelsea considering they are supposedly the most interested

by Albiceleste Mon Oct 31, 2011 6:20 pm

Hopefully RM gets Nerman and avoids buying Hazard Very Happy

by huntsman Mon Oct 31, 2011 6:24 pm

Lionel Messi wrote:Hopefully RM gets Nerman and avoids buying Hazard

We dont need both but we can do with the services of either.

See you in December.

by Mr Nick09 Mon Oct 31, 2011 6:35 pm

sportsczy wrote:Because it's not the transfer fee itself... wages at arsenal are about 2/3 to 3/4 of the elite clubs'. If they were to give Hazard 120k a week (that's what it would take), they would have to give raises to their entire team since he would be the highest paid player.

come on, Hazard wouldnt earn that much

by Highburied Mon Oct 31, 2011 7:01 pm

Those who say Arsenal cant afford him are just wrong...

Yes we can afford any kind of player but the question is: Is it worth it to pay over 40m on a player who was less effective than Gervinho last season?

Hazard has 4 assists and 4 goals ...

Ramsey 8 assists, 2 goals....

by izzy Mon Oct 31, 2011 7:03 pm

highburied wrote:Those who say Arsenal cant afford him are just wrong...

Yes we can afford any kind of player but the question is: Is it worth it to pay over 40m on a player who was less effective than Gervinho last season?

Hazard has 4 assists and 4 goals ...

Ramsey 8 assists, 2 goals....

Stats only tell half the story, you know that.

by huntsman Mon Oct 31, 2011 7:21 pm

izzy26 wrote:
highburied wrote:Those who say Arsenal cant afford him are just wrong...

Yes we can afford any kind of player but the question is: Is it worth it to pay over 40m on a player who was less effective than Gervinho last season?

Hazard has 4 assists and 4 goals ...

Ramsey 8 assists, 2 goals....

Stats only tell half the story, you know that.

Prove it. Provide the proof that stats tell half the story.

by Highburied Mon Oct 31, 2011 7:25 pm

Yeah and Im not saying Ramsey>Hazard... just spending 40 mil is too much for a young player.

Im a big fan of Hazard though. Hopefully someone from Arsenal comes out and says he has Arsenal DNA, and Hazard says would love to return... i mean go to Arsenal, bla bla... somewhere at 25m would be amazing.

All top clubs will be after him.

by Sponsored content