Idrisozet wrote:

Arquitecto wrote:

Idrisozet wrote:When I searched best striker of all time here is what I found

On this website Muller was no 5
http://bleacherreport.com/articles/145411-greatest-ever-football-top-ten-strikers-of-all-time

Muller was no 1 among 50 best striker
http://forums.soccerfansnetwork.com/showthread.php?72652-The-Greatest-Strikers-of-All-Time

Muller no 3
http://www.bigsoccer.com/forum/showthread.php?s=8c1ced6b50b32382b765e8ff1a7f8521&t=1636973&page=11


But when I typed best player of all time here is what I found

http://www.football-history.net/best-players.htm
No Muller

http://listverse.com/2008/12/11/top-20-football-players-of-all-time/
Muller no 6

http://uk.askmen.com/top_10/entertainment/92f_top_10_list.html
no Muller


I DONT KNOW IF IT'S SO HARD FOR YOU GUYS TO DRAW A DISTINCTION BETWEEN BEST PLAYERS OF ALL TIME...EG CRUYF , PELE, rONALDINHO, MARADONA, Franz BeckenbaueR

AND BEST STRIKER OF ALL TIME EG MULLER, Ronaldo, Eusebio. ETC

As Spencer said, you massively failed in comprehension.

Read my post again.

I said there is a reason why Muller isn't rated as THE BEST striker of all time by football experts.

SMH

Prove it that many don't consider Muller as the best striker of all time, I assure you that, thats your opinion many do consider him as the best striker of time

But I understand not everyone consider him as the best footballer of all time.

Prove it?

It general footballing knowledge to know who is considered to be THE BEST and who is not.

Obviously there are exceptions but the percentage is very low to consider Muller the best as he simply WAS NOT. There are several who were ahead of him and if you don't know that, then do your homework.

Prove it? I don't have to as this is a general consensus that he isn't as I am simply stating what I know of from footballing historians and experts as I've yet to see one call him the best of all time. There may be a small percentage but exceptions are NOT counted as the rule.

Simple logic really. If anything, you should proof the critical opinion Muller if he is or not.

Your tying yourself up in knots here.

azzurres wrote:

Idrisozet wrote:

Arquitecto wrote:

Idrisozet wrote:When I searched best striker of all time here is what I found

On this website Muller was no 5
http://bleacherreport.com/articles/145411-greatest-ever-football-top-ten-strikers-of-all-time

Muller was no 1 among 50 best striker
http://forums.soccerfansnetwork.com/showthread.php?72652-The-Greatest-Strikers-of-All-Time

Muller no 3
http://www.bigsoccer.com/forum/showthread.php?s=8c1ced6b50b32382b765e8ff1a7f8521&t=1636973&page=11


But when I typed best player of all time here is what I found

http://www.football-history.net/best-players.htm
No Muller

http://listverse.com/2008/12/11/top-20-football-players-of-all-time/
Muller no 6

http://uk.askmen.com/top_10/entertainment/92f_top_10_list.html
no Muller


I DONT KNOW IF IT'S SO HARD FOR YOU GUYS TO DRAW A DISTINCTION BETWEEN BEST PLAYERS OF ALL TIME...EG CRUYF , PELE, rONALDINHO, MARADONA, Franz BeckenbaueR

AND BEST STRIKER OF ALL TIME EG MULLER, Ronaldo, Eusebio. ETC

As Spencer said, you massively failed in comprehension.

Read my post again.

I said there is a reason why Muller isn't rated as THE BEST striker of all time by football experts.

SMH

Prove it that many don't consider Muller as the best striker of all time, I assure you that, thats your opinion many do consider him as the best striker of time

But I understand not everyone consider him as the best footballer of all time.

Ahem, your links prove that many don't consider Muller as the best striker at all time, only one has him as #1.

With that said, what a joy this is, seeing non-United fans praising our little Rooney, Roonay, whatever

Our little Rooney? whatever?

Are you even a United fan?

its like me saying Our little Suaez or Our little Gezzard.

Who the **** is "Rooney"

His name is Roonay and I'm not even a United fan ffs

Arquitecto wrote:

azzurres wrote:

Idrisozet wrote:

Arquitecto wrote:

Idrisozet wrote:When I searched best striker of all time here is what I found

On this website Muller was no 5
http://bleacherreport.com/articles/145411-greatest-ever-football-top-ten-strikers-of-all-time

Muller was no 1 among 50 best striker
http://forums.soccerfansnetwork.com/showthread.php?72652-The-Greatest-Strikers-of-All-Time

Muller no 3
http://www.bigsoccer.com/forum/showthread.php?s=8c1ced6b50b32382b765e8ff1a7f8521&t=1636973&page=11


But when I typed best player of all time here is what I found

http://www.football-history.net/best-players.htm
No Muller

http://listverse.com/2008/12/11/top-20-football-players-of-all-time/
Muller no 6

http://uk.askmen.com/top_10/entertainment/92f_top_10_list.html
no Muller


I DONT KNOW IF IT'S SO HARD FOR YOU GUYS TO DRAW A DISTINCTION BETWEEN BEST PLAYERS OF ALL TIME...EG CRUYF , PELE, rONALDINHO, MARADONA, Franz BeckenbaueR

AND BEST STRIKER OF ALL TIME EG MULLER, Ronaldo, Eusebio. ETC

As Spencer said, you massively failed in comprehension.

Read my post again.

I said there is a reason why Muller isn't rated as THE BEST striker of all time by football experts.

SMH

Prove it that many don't consider Muller as the best striker of all time, I assure you that, thats your opinion many do consider him as the best striker of time

But I understand not everyone consider him as the best footballer of all time.

Ahem, your links prove that many don't consider Muller as the best striker at all time, only one has him as #1.

With that said, what a joy this is, seeing non-United fans praising our little Rooney, Roonay, whatever

Our little Rooney? whatever?

Are you even a United fan?

its like me saying Our little Suaez or Our little Gezzard.

Who the **** is "Rooney"

His name is Roonay and I'm not even a United fan ffs

It sounds Roonie in my country

azzurres wrote:

Idrisozet wrote:

Arquitecto wrote:

Idrisozet wrote:When I searched best striker of all time here is what I found

On this website Muller was no 5
http://bleacherreport.com/articles/145411-greatest-ever-football-top-ten-strikers-of-all-time

Muller was no 1 among 50 best striker
http://forums.soccerfansnetwork.com/showthread.php?72652-The-Greatest-Strikers-of-All-Time

Muller no 3
http://www.bigsoccer.com/forum/showthread.php?s=8c1ced6b50b32382b765e8ff1a7f8521&t=1636973&page=11


But when I typed best player of all time here is what I found

http://www.football-history.net/best-players.htm
No Muller

http://listverse.com/2008/12/11/top-20-football-players-of-all-time/
Muller no 6

http://uk.askmen.com/top_10/entertainment/92f_top_10_list.html
no Muller


I DONT KNOW IF IT'S SO HARD FOR YOU GUYS TO DRAW A DISTINCTION BETWEEN BEST PLAYERS OF ALL TIME...EG CRUYF , PELE, rONALDINHO, MARADONA, Franz BeckenbaueR

AND BEST STRIKER OF ALL TIME EG MULLER, Ronaldo, Eusebio. ETC

As Spencer said, you massively failed in comprehension.

Read my post again.

I said there is a reason why Muller isn't rated as THE BEST striker of all time by football experts.

SMH

Prove it that many don't consider Muller as the best striker of all time, I assure you that, thats your opinion many do consider him as the best striker of time

But I understand not everyone consider him as the best footballer of all time.

Ahem, your links prove that many don't consider Muller as the best striker at all time, only one has him as #1.

With that said, what a joy this is, seeing non-United fans praising our little Rooney, Roonay, whatever

I have 3 link of the best striker of all time and there is no conclusive fact on who the best striker of time, all 3 list have 3 different winner of which one is Muller the winners, which support my ideal that there is no such thing as the best striker of all time, many have their opinion.

I am not saying all consider Muller as the best striker of all time, but that list did prove that many consider him as the best striker off all time because he was involve in all the list I found for best strikers of all time.

But the last 3 list was for best player of time, which Muller was involve just once, as a result Many do consider Muller as the best striker of all time but few consider him as the best player of all time

Arquitecto wrote:

Idrisozet wrote:

Arquitecto wrote:

Idrisozet wrote:When I searched best striker of all time here is what I found

On this website Muller was no 5
http://bleacherreport.com/articles/145411-greatest-ever-football-top-ten-strikers-of-all-time

Muller was no 1 among 50 best striker
http://forums.soccerfansnetwork.com/showthread.php?72652-The-Greatest-Strikers-of-All-Time

Muller no 3
http://www.bigsoccer.com/forum/showthread.php?s=8c1ced6b50b32382b765e8ff1a7f8521&t=1636973&page=11


But when I typed best player of all time here is what I found

http://www.football-history.net/best-players.htm
No Muller

http://listverse.com/2008/12/11/top-20-football-players-of-all-time/
Muller no 6

http://uk.askmen.com/top_10/entertainment/92f_top_10_list.html
no Muller


I DONT KNOW IF IT'S SO HARD FOR YOU GUYS TO DRAW A DISTINCTION BETWEEN BEST PLAYERS OF ALL TIME...EG CRUYF , PELE, rONALDINHO, MARADONA, Franz BeckenbaueR

AND BEST STRIKER OF ALL TIME EG MULLER, Ronaldo, Eusebio. ETC

As Spencer said, you massively failed in comprehension.

Read my post again.

I said there is a reason why Muller isn't rated as THE BEST striker of all time by football experts.

SMH

Prove it that many don't consider Muller as the best striker of all time, I assure you that, thats your opinion many do consider him as the best striker of time

But I understand not everyone consider him as the best footballer of all time.

Prove it?

It general footballing knowledge to know who is considered to be THE BEST and who is not.

Obviously there are exceptions but the percentage is very low to consider Muller the best as he simply WAS NOT. There are several who were ahead of him and if you don't know that, then do your homework.

Prove it? I don't have to as this is a general consensus that he isn't as I am simply stating what I know of from footballing historians and experts as I've yet to see one call him the best of all time. There may be a small percentage but exceptions are NOT counted as the rule.

Simple logic really. If anything, you should proof the critical opinion Muller if he is or not.

Your tying yourself up in knots here.

Notice how you switch from best striker of all time

to just best.

When in fact my argument is that Many do consider Muller as the BEST STRIKER of all time

as oppose

To the BEST(player) of All time.

I saw what you tried to do there

You guys are going around in circles when you basically are already agreeing with each other

1/3 = 33.3%

So it is the minority that labels Muller as the Best striker of all time.

Regardless, I am on the opinion that there is no such thing as THE GOAT. there are tiers, and Muller is obviously Tier L (L for legend).

I simply pointed out your comprehension error.

Lord Spencer wrote:1/3 = 33.3%

So it is the minority that labels Muller as the Best striker of all time.

Regardless, I am on the opinion that there is no such thing as THE GOAT. there are tiers, and Muller is obviously Tier L (L for legend).

I simply pointed out your comprehension error.

I see it more like this

1/3 = 33.3%

1 Muller = 33.3%
1 Pele = 33.3
1 Ferenc Puskas = 33.3%

Muller is clearly not on Minority side.

That looks a lot more like many to me(draw a distinction between many and majority), considering the ground of argument that many dont rate Muller as the best striker of time, from your combination of the list as you can see no one is rated above him. Considering the fact that he was 3rd in the other list and 5th in another, shows that many do rate him as the best striker of all time

Pele had more Goals than Muller (just saying).

But not all consider him as the best player of all time but many do consider him as best striker of all time, along with Pele, Ronaldo, Eusebio etc.

Idrisozet wrote:

Arquitecto wrote:

Idrisozet wrote:

Arquitecto wrote:

Idrisozet wrote:When I searched best striker of all time here is what I found

On this website Muller was no 5
http://bleacherreport.com/articles/145411-greatest-ever-football-top-ten-strikers-of-all-time

Muller was no 1 among 50 best striker
http://forums.soccerfansnetwork.com/showthread.php?72652-The-Greatest-Strikers-of-All-Time

Muller no 3
http://www.bigsoccer.com/forum/showthread.php?s=8c1ced6b50b32382b765e8ff1a7f8521&t=1636973&page=11


But when I typed best player of all time here is what I found

http://www.football-history.net/best-players.htm
No Muller

http://listverse.com/2008/12/11/top-20-football-players-of-all-time/
Muller no 6

http://uk.askmen.com/top_10/entertainment/92f_top_10_list.html
no Muller


I DONT KNOW IF IT'S SO HARD FOR YOU GUYS TO DRAW A DISTINCTION BETWEEN BEST PLAYERS OF ALL TIME...EG CRUYF , PELE, rONALDINHO, MARADONA, Franz BeckenbaueR

AND BEST STRIKER OF ALL TIME EG MULLER, Ronaldo, Eusebio. ETC

As Spencer said, you massively failed in comprehension.

Read my post again.

I said there is a reason why Muller isn't rated as THE BEST striker of all time by football experts.

SMH

Prove it that many don't consider Muller as the best striker of all time, I assure you that, thats your opinion many do consider him as the best striker of time

But I understand not everyone consider him as the best footballer of all time.

Prove it?

It general footballing knowledge to know who is considered to be THE BEST and who is not.

Obviously there are exceptions but the percentage is very low to consider Muller the best as he simply WAS NOT. There are several who were ahead of him and if you don't know that, then do your homework.

Prove it? I don't have to as this is a general consensus that he isn't as I am simply stating what I know of from footballing historians and experts as I've yet to see one call him the best of all time. There may be a small percentage but exceptions are NOT counted as the rule.

Simple logic really. If anything, you should proof the critical opinion Muller if he is or not.

Your tying yourself up in knots here.

Notice how you switch from best striker of all time

to just best.

When in fact my argument is that Many do consider Muller as the BEST STRIKER of all time

as oppose

To the BEST(player) of All time.

I saw what you tried to do there

You saw what I did there? How about instead of trying to read between the lines, you actually read the lines.

Do I have to spell out that I'm talking about the best striker of all time?

Why would I even have a reason to shift my debate?

Do I have to spell it out for you? Your intelligent, so don't stoop to that level.

Arquitecto wrote:

Idrisozet wrote:

Arquitecto wrote:

Idrisozet wrote:

Arquitecto wrote:

Idrisozet wrote:When I searched best striker of all time here is what I found

On this website Muller was no 5
http://bleacherreport.com/articles/145411-greatest-ever-football-top-ten-strikers-of-all-time

Muller was no 1 among 50 best striker
http://forums.soccerfansnetwork.com/showthread.php?72652-The-Greatest-Strikers-of-All-Time

Muller no 3
http://www.bigsoccer.com/forum/showthread.php?s=8c1ced6b50b32382b765e8ff1a7f8521&t=1636973&page=11


But when I typed best player of all time here is what I found

http://www.football-history.net/best-players.htm
No Muller

http://listverse.com/2008/12/11/top-20-football-players-of-all-time/
Muller no 6

http://uk.askmen.com/top_10/entertainment/92f_top_10_list.html
no Muller


I DONT KNOW IF IT'S SO HARD FOR YOU GUYS TO DRAW A DISTINCTION BETWEEN BEST PLAYERS OF ALL TIME...EG CRUYF , PELE, rONALDINHO, MARADONA, Franz BeckenbaueR

AND BEST STRIKER OF ALL TIME EG MULLER, Ronaldo, Eusebio. ETC

As Spencer said, you massively failed in comprehension.

Read my post again.

I said there is a reason why Muller isn't rated as THE BEST striker of all time by football experts.

SMH

Prove it that many don't consider Muller as the best striker of all time, I assure you that, thats your opinion many do consider him as the best striker of time

But I understand not everyone consider him as the best footballer of all time.

Prove it?

It general footballing knowledge to know who is considered to be THE BEST and who is not.

Obviously there are exceptions but the percentage is very low to consider Muller the best as he simply WAS NOT. There are several who were ahead of him and if you don't know that, then do your homework.

Prove it? I don't have to as this is a general consensus that he isn't as I am simply stating what I know of from footballing historians and experts as I've yet to see one call him the best of all time. There may be a small percentage but exceptions are NOT counted as the rule.

Simple logic really. If anything, you should proof the critical opinion Muller if he is or not.

Your tying yourself up in knots here.

Notice how you switch from best striker of all time

to just best.

When in fact my argument is that Many do consider Muller as the BEST STRIKER of all time

as oppose

To the BEST(player) of All time.

I saw what you tried to do there

You saw what I did there? How about instead of trying to read between the lines, you actually read the lines.

Do I have to spell out that I'm talking about the best striker of all time?

Why would I even have a reason to shift my debate?

Do I have to spell it out for you? Your intelligent, so don't stoop to that level.

Well''. your lack of understanding has reached a point of no return, if you think people don't consider Muller as one of the best striker of all time.

All I can say now is that I feel sorry for you.

spear me the bs of one particular best striker of all time, it doesn't exist so there is no point of you saying it. you can only say one of the best striker of all time and many do consider Muller as one of the best striker of all time.

Idrisozet wrote:

Arquitecto wrote:

Idrisozet wrote:

Arquitecto wrote:

Idrisozet wrote:

Arquitecto wrote:

Idrisozet wrote:When I searched best striker of all time here is what I found

On this website Muller was no 5
http://bleacherreport.com/articles/145411-greatest-ever-football-top-ten-strikers-of-all-time

Muller was no 1 among 50 best striker
http://forums.soccerfansnetwork.com/showthread.php?72652-The-Greatest-Strikers-of-All-Time

Muller no 3
http://www.bigsoccer.com/forum/showthread.php?s=8c1ced6b50b32382b765e8ff1a7f8521&t=1636973&page=11


But when I typed best player of all time here is what I found

http://www.football-history.net/best-players.htm
No Muller

http://listverse.com/2008/12/11/top-20-football-players-of-all-time/
Muller no 6

http://uk.askmen.com/top_10/entertainment/92f_top_10_list.html
no Muller


I DONT KNOW IF IT'S SO HARD FOR YOU GUYS TO DRAW A DISTINCTION BETWEEN BEST PLAYERS OF ALL TIME...EG CRUYF , PELE, rONALDINHO, MARADONA, Franz BeckenbaueR

AND BEST STRIKER OF ALL TIME EG MULLER, Ronaldo, Eusebio. ETC

As Spencer said, you massively failed in comprehension.

Read my post again.

I said there is a reason why Muller isn't rated as THE BEST striker of all time by football experts.

SMH

Prove it that many don't consider Muller as the best striker of all time, I assure you that, thats your opinion many do consider him as the best striker of time

But I understand not everyone consider him as the best footballer of all time.

Prove it?

It general footballing knowledge to know who is considered to be THE BEST and who is not.

Obviously there are exceptions but the percentage is very low to consider Muller the best as he simply WAS NOT. There are several who were ahead of him and if you don't know that, then do your homework.

Prove it? I don't have to as this is a general consensus that he isn't as I am simply stating what I know of from footballing historians and experts as I've yet to see one call him the best of all time. There may be a small percentage but exceptions are NOT counted as the rule.

Simple logic really. If anything, you should proof the critical opinion Muller if he is or not.

Your tying yourself up in knots here.

Notice how you switch from best striker of all time

to just best.

When in fact my argument is that Many do consider Muller as the BEST STRIKER of all time

as oppose

To the BEST(player) of All time.

I saw what you tried to do there

You saw what I did there? How about instead of trying to read between the lines, you actually read the lines.

Do I have to spell out that I'm talking about the best striker of all time?

Why would I even have a reason to shift my debate?

Do I have to spell it out for you? Your intelligent, so don't stoop to that level.

Well''. your lack of understanding has reached a point of no return, if you think people don't consider Muller as one of the best striker of all time.

All I can say now is that I feel sorry for you.

spear me the bs of one particular best striker of all time, it doesn't exist so there is no point of you saying it. you can only say one of the best striker of all time and many do consider Muller as one of the best striker of all time.

Good god.

Did I not already say that he is ONE OF THE BEST STRIKERS of all time???

Last time now, I said, along with a general footballing view, that he is not THE best of all time.

How did me pointing out something quite hilarious turn into... this?

ali8775 wrote:
I still can't get over Benzema and Gomez ahead of Rooney

-_-

He is one of the best strikers of all time and only behind pele and inmo, as a striker he is superior to R9 in everyway. What has R9 done that is better? Gerd Muller was instrumental in all of germanys NT success, winning WC and Euros and scoring a goal in every final he played in. He is the best striker behind pele for me. No comparison really. Anyways, statistically, Gomez is in the best form atm in europe bar messi. So people neefd to calm down. Who else is there, Ronaldo? Looool. What was he doing for portugal? Guller is banging them in for fun.

jibers wrote:He is one of the best strikers of all time and only behind pele and inmo, as a striker he is superior to R9 in everyway. What has R9 done that is better? Gerd Muller was instrumental in all of germanys NT success, winning WC and Euros and scoring a goal in every final he played in. He is the best striker behind pele for me. No comparison really. Anyways, statistically, Gomez is in the best form atm in europe bar messi. So people neefd to calm down. Who else is there, Ronaldo? Looool. What was he doing for portugal? Guller is banging them in for fun.

Ummmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm

Sorry.

No world cup.
No Golden Ball
Not better than Ronaldo.

Arquitecto wrote:

Idrisozet wrote:

Arquitecto wrote:

Idrisozet wrote:

Arquitecto wrote:

Idrisozet wrote:

Arquitecto wrote:

Idrisozet wrote:When I searched best striker of all time here is what I found

On this website Muller was no 5
http://bleacherreport.com/articles/145411-greatest-ever-football-top-ten-strikers-of-all-time

Muller was no 1 among 50 best striker
http://forums.soccerfansnetwork.com/showthread.php?72652-The-Greatest-Strikers-of-All-Time

Muller no 3
http://www.bigsoccer.com/forum/showthread.php?s=8c1ced6b50b32382b765e8ff1a7f8521&t=1636973&page=11


But when I typed best player of all time here is what I found

http://www.football-history.net/best-players.htm
No Muller

http://listverse.com/2008/12/11/top-20-football-players-of-all-time/
Muller no 6

http://uk.askmen.com/top_10/entertainment/92f_top_10_list.html
no Muller


I DONT KNOW IF IT'S SO HARD FOR YOU GUYS TO DRAW A DISTINCTION BETWEEN BEST PLAYERS OF ALL TIME...EG CRUYF , PELE, rONALDINHO, MARADONA, Franz BeckenbaueR

AND BEST STRIKER OF ALL TIME EG MULLER, Ronaldo, Eusebio. ETC

As Spencer said, you massively failed in comprehension.

Read my post again.

I said there is a reason why Muller isn't rated as THE BEST striker of all time by football experts.

SMH

Prove it that many don't consider Muller as the best striker of all time, I assure you that, thats your opinion many do consider him as the best striker of time

But I understand not everyone consider him as the best footballer of all time.

Prove it?

It general footballing knowledge to know who is considered to be THE BEST and who is not.

Obviously there are exceptions but the percentage is very low to consider Muller the best as he simply WAS NOT. There are several who were ahead of him and if you don't know that, then do your homework.

Prove it? I don't have to as this is a general consensus that he isn't as I am simply stating what I know of from footballing historians and experts as I've yet to see one call him the best of all time. There may be a small percentage but exceptions are NOT counted as the rule.

Simple logic really. If anything, you should proof the critical opinion Muller if he is or not.

Your tying yourself up in knots here.

Notice how you switch from best striker of all time

to just best.

When in fact my argument is that Many do consider Muller as the BEST STRIKER of all time

as oppose

To the BEST(player) of All time.

I saw what you tried to do there

You saw what I did there? How about instead of trying to read between the lines, you actually read the lines.

Do I have to spell out that I'm talking about the best striker of all time?

Why would I even have a reason to shift my debate?

Do I have to spell it out for you? Your intelligent, so don't stoop to that level.

Well''. your lack of understanding has reached a point of no return, if you think people don't consider Muller as one of the best striker of all time.

All I can say now is that I feel sorry for you.

spear me the bs of one particular best striker of all time, it doesn't exist so there is no point of you saying it. you can only say one of the best striker of all time and many do consider Muller as one of the best striker of all time.

Good god.

Did I not already say that he is ONE OF THE BEST STRIKERS of all time???

Last time now, I said, along with a general footballing view, that he is not THE best of all time.

But here is nothing as such...."Best striker of all time"....

If You say there is then tell me the best striker of all time according to general football view, give me a sort of evidence say for example a recognise football award body or even if it's some jack-ass internet list.

ragbirjosh wrote:

jibers wrote:He is one of the best strikers of all time and only behind pele and inmo, as a striker he is superior to R9 in everyway. What has R9 done that is better? Gerd Muller was instrumental in all of germanys NT success, winning WC and Euros and scoring a goal in every final he played in. He is the best striker behind pele for me. No comparison really. Anyways, statistically, Gomez is in the best form atm in europe bar messi. So people neefd to calm down. Who else is there, Ronaldo? Looool. What was he doing for portugal? Guller is banging them in for fun.

Ummmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm

Sorry.

No world cup.
No Golden Ball
Not better than Ronaldo.

Wow. Now I know what I am dealing with in this forum. Muller was instrumental in germany winning the 74 WC. Lol, look at the competition, cruyff, backenbauer, neeskans. Muller was the best GS of his generation, was R9? The overhyping of a plauer that achieved nothing but a WC is beyond me. In is best ever season what did he do? R9 might have had the flair and the dribbling, but what did his end product bring? No cl, no party.

Godmez is the superior striker to the likes of Rooney and Benz I read here so often 'complete' about Benz and Rooney. Godmez is fast as sh!t, very physical, clinical, with smart runs, can dribble, score with either feet or head the ball. A player with little skill?



@44s and the goal, tell me a better story brah!

or



@1.30 , he doesn't 'just' poach, he starts the moves and then finishes them Company is a wall on his day, look how he wrong footed him

Benz isn't fast, not physical enough, can't head the ball for sh!t or we would win the supercopa. Rooney is more of a withdrawn SS. If you compare him to Gomez, Gomez scored more goals per game in the last 4-5 years than him. Even in his transitional year in Bayern, his quota wasn't bad (goals/minutes), he just didn't start
If you guys are blind to see his sheer greatness then you can't be helped :lol!:

Arquitecto wrote:...

Dude, I'm very much alive. Through away your disturbing sig

I-no is back? wth lool

babun1024 wrote:Godmez is a superior striker to the likes of Rooney and Benz I read here so often 'complete' about Benz and Rooney. Godmez is fast as sh!t, very physical, clinical, with smart runs, can dribble, score with either feet or head the ball. A player with little skill?



@44s and the goal, tell me a better story brah!

or



@1.30 , he doesn't 'just' poach, he starts the moves and then finishes them Company is a wall on his day, look how he wrong footed him

Benz isn't fast, not physical enough, can't head the ball for sh!t or we would win the supercopa. Rooney is more of a withdrawn SS. If you compare him to Gomez, Gomez scored more goals per game in the last 4-5 years than him. Even in his transitional year in Bayern, his quota wasn't bad (goals/minutes), he just didn't start
If you guys are blind to see his sheer greatness then you can't be helped :lol!:

Welcome back mate.

You are missing the main point in that Gomez needs to do this for more time for it to be considered more than a fluke year. If he does it this year for both Bayren and Germany we will all be congratulating him.

Many had the same calls for them being WC but they ended up missing the mark. No need to over-hype now when you can appreciate later.

Lord Spencer wrote:

babun1024 wrote:Godmez is a superior striker to the likes of Rooney and Benz I read here so often 'complete' about Benz and Rooney. Godmez is fast as sh!t, very physical, clinical, with smart runs, can dribble, score with either feet or head the ball. A player with little skill?



@44s and the goal, tell me a better story brah!

or



@1.30 , he doesn't 'just' poach, he starts the moves and then finishes them Company is a wall on his day, look how he wrong footed him

Benz isn't fast, not physical enough, can't head the ball for sh!t or we would win the supercopa. Rooney is more of a withdrawn SS. If you compare him to Gomez, Gomez scored more goals per game in the last 4-5 years than him. Even in his transitional year in Bayern, his quota wasn't bad (goals/minutes), he just didn't start
If you guys are blind to see his sheer greatness then you can't be helped :lol!:

Welcome back mate.

You are missing the main point in that Gomez needs to do this for more time for it to be considered more than a fluke year. If he does it this year for both Bayren and Germany we will all be congratulating him.

Many had the same calls for them being WC but they ended up missing the mark. No need to over-hype now when you can appreciate later.

You still missed my point. I highlighted it in red for you He isn't a one season wonder. He won the Bundesliga against a strong Bayern, scored a hattrick in the process.He wasn't a poacher in Stuttgart, they played counterattack football
He made those insane numbers for 4-5 years

babun1024 wrote:Godmez is the superior striker to the likes of Rooney and Benz I read here so often 'complete' about Benz and Rooney. Godmez is fast as sh!t, very physical, clinical, with smart runs, can dribble, score with either feet or head the ball. A player with little skill?



@44s and the goal, tell me a better story brah!

or



@1.30 , he doesn't 'just' poach, he starts the moves and then finishes them Company is a wall on his day, look how he wrong footed him

Benz isn't fast, not physical enough, can't head the ball for sh!t or we would win the supercopa. Rooney is more of a withdrawn SS. If you compare him to Gomez, Gomez scored more goals per game in the last 4-5 years than him. Even in his transitional year in Bayern, his quota wasn't bad (goals/minutes), he just didn't start
If you guys are blind to see his sheer greatness then you can't be helped :lol!:

Arquitecto wrote:...

Dude, I'm very much alive. Through away your disturbing sig

Wtf...shit just got real...

Jibers is gonna be happy now

But I never said Benz is WC, Gomes is miles better than Benz. And I know Gomez played great in his final year with Stuttgart. However, this is the year he can announce himself as a Tier 1 current player with both Bayren and Germany poised for silver.

If he does not show up, then he will not make the step up some claim he already is in. I think we both can agree he is not a current Tier 1 player.

Gomez better than rooney? wow..

Great post by Arq on page 4. i am surprised the debate continued after that post!

Lord Spencer wrote:But I never said Benz is WC, Gomes is miles better than Benz. And I know Gomez played great in his final year with Stuttgart. However, this is the year he can announce himself as a Tier 1 current player with both Bayren and Germany poised for silver.

If he does not show up, then he will not make the step up some claim he already is in. I think we both can agree he is not a current Tier 1 player.

Again, excuses... He was great for Stuttgart for 3 years but you only count the last one One example, after he left they collapsed They can't even reach anywhere near CL places anymore for 2nd year

Lord Spencer wrote: with both Bayren and Germany poised for silver.

Silver? We strive for gold